Graphical AbstractVerifiedThe therapeutic efficacy comparison of MSCs derived different tissues unveilings anti-apoptosis more crucial than angiogenesis in treating acute myocardial infarction
Background Myocardial infarction (MI) is a severe disease that often associated with impaired angiogenesis and increased myocardial apoptosis. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been a promising candidate for treating myocardial infarction. However, functional heterogeneity of MSCs leads to inconsistent therapeutic efficiency and the current MSCs-based therapy lacks the concept and implementation of precision medicine. In this study, we compared the cardioprotective effect of UCMSCs and ADMSCs targeting the angiogenesis in a mouse MI model and screened out optimum MSCs candidate for precise clinical application. Methods The gene expression profiles of UCMSCs and ADMSCs were investigated through RNA sequencing analysis. To compare their angiogenic potential, we performed tube formation assay, Matrigel plug assays, and aortic ring assay, and analyzed pro-angiogenic genes via qPCR. Subsequently, UCMSCs and ADMSCs were respectively injected into myocardium after MI surgery in mice. On day 28 post-MI, echocardiography was performed to assess cardiac function. Histological analysis was performed to assess MSCs retention, angiogenesis, and myocardial apoptosis. Additionally, the anti-apoptosis effects mediated by MSCs were further evaluated using flow cytometry in hypoxia H9C2 and HL-1 cells. Results The RNA sequencing analysis revealed differences in gene expression related to angiogenesis and apoptosis pathways between UCMSCs and ADMSCs. UCMSCs presented greater pro-angiogenesis activity than ADMSCs in vitro and in vivo. Both of UCMSCs and ADMSCs improved cardiac function, decreased infarction area and inhibited cardiomyocyte apoptosis while promoting angiogenesis post-MI in mice. Notably, ADMSCs exerted a better cardioprotective function than UCMSCs and stronger anti-apoptotic effect on residual cardiomyocytes.
