🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.1186/s13287-024-03872-4Original Research

Characteristics of HPC(A) product obtained from a donor with SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcome of autologous transplant

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: Characteristics of HPC(A) product obtained from a donor with SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcome of autologous transplant

Pranav S. Renavikar¹,Phyllis I. Warkentin¹,Shelly M. Williams¹,Krishna Gundabolu¹,Charles Branson¹,Scott A. Koepsell¹

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Characteristics of HPC(A) product obtained from a donor with SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcome of autologous transplant
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Published:2024Edition:Vol. 15, None • pp. 251Citation:Pranav S. Renavikar et al. (2024), Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Stem Cell Research & Therapy (干细胞研究与转化).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • HPC(A) product collected during acute, minimally symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection tested negative for viral RNA by RT-PCR, suggesting low risk of product viremia. • Autologous stem cell transplant using this product was successful, with engraftment and recovery, indicating that transplantation may be feasible in such scenarios. • Donor screening questionnaires may miss minimally symptomatic Covid-19 cases, highlighting the need for objective testing and careful risk assessment. • This case provides evidence that HPC(A) collection during acute Covid-19 infection may be safe, but larger studies are needed to confirm outcomes.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Collection of hematopoietic progenitor cell products [HPC(A)] is deferred if the donor is symptomatic and tests positive for Covid-19. However, donor questionnaires are subjective and may miss minimally symptomatic donors. Alternatively, myalgia associated with Covid-19 infection can be falsely dismissed as an adverse effect of granulocyte stimulating factor (Filgrastim) administered prior to product collection. The likelihood of donors with an underlying acute but minimally symptomatic infection undergoing successful product collection is significant. In these circumstances, it is less known whether Covid-19 infection results in product viremia or alters the clinical outcome of transplant. We aimed to evaluate the above question by studying a donor whose product was collected during acute Covid-19 infection. Aliquots of the product tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR). Importantly, the donor received an autologous stem cell transplant using the product collected at the time of infection, and their case will be described in this report. We describe one of the very few reports of successful transplant of HPC(A) product collected during acute Covid-19 infection.

1. Introduction

Collection of hematopoietic progenitor cell products [HPC(A)] is deferred if the donor is symptomatic and tests positive for Covid-19. However, donor questionnaires are subjective and may miss minimally symptomatic donors. Alternatively, myalgia associated with Covid-19 infection can be falsely dismissed as an adverse effect of granulocyte stimulating factor (Filgrastim) administered prior to product collection. The likelihood of donors with an underlying acute but minimally symptomatic infection undergoing successful product collection is significant.

In these circumstances, it is less known whether Covid-19 infection results in product viremia or alters the clinical outcome of transplant. We aimed to evaluate the above question by studying a donor whose product was collected during acute Covid-19 infection. Aliquots of the product tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR). Importantly, the donor received an autologous stem cell transplant using the product collected at the time of infection, and their case will be described in this report.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Pranav S. Renavikar, Phyllis I. Warkentin, Shelly M. Williams, Krishna Gundabolu, Charles Branson, Scott A. Koepsell (2026). Characteristics of HPC(A) product obtained from a donor with SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcome of autologous transplant. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-03872-4
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can HPC(A) products be collected from donors with acute Covid-19 infection?

This case report demonstrates that HPC(A) collection was performed in a donor with acute, minimally symptomatic Covid-19 infection. The product tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and the subsequent autologous transplant was successful, suggesting that collection may be feasible in select cases.

What are the risks of using HPC(A) products from Covid-19 positive donors?

The primary concern is potential product viremia and transmission of the virus to the recipient. In this case, RT-PCR testing of the product did not detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and the transplant proceeded without complications. However, larger studies are needed to fully assess risks.

How was the HPC(A) product tested for SARS-CoV-2?

The product aliquot was thawed, total nucleic acid was extracted, and RT-PCR was performed using primers for the SARS-CoV-2 E gene and the internal control RNase P gene. The RNase P gene amplified with a cycle threshold of 18.7, but no Covid-19 RNA was detected after 40 cycles.

What was the outcome of the autologous transplant using the Covid-19 positive donor's product?

The patient received the autologous stem cell transplant after a 45-day delay. The transplant was successful, with engraftment and recovery, despite the product being collected during acute Covid-19 infection.

Why is this case significant?

This is one of the few reports of successful autologous transplant using HPC(A) product collected during acute Covid-19 infection. It highlights the need for objective testing and careful risk assessment in donors who may be minimally symptomatic, and suggests that transplantation may be possible in such scenarios.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF