Impact of lesser trochanter displacement on hip function following minimally invasive intramedullary nailing for geriatric intertrochanteric fractures
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous minimally invasive intramedullary nailing is a common and effective treatment for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly, effectively avoiding complications. However, intertrochanteric fractures involving the lesser trochanter remain problematic, particularly with lesser trochanteric separation. Due to the diverse types of lesser trochanteric separation, there are few reports on whether lesser trochanteric separation should be fixed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of lesser trochanter displacement distance on postoperative functional outcomes in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with minimally invasive intramedullary nailing, providing clinical data to determine whether fixation is necessary. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 46 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures and lesser trochanter separation who underwent intramedullary nailing fixation and received effective follow-up at the Department of Emergency Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital from August 2020 to December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on displacement distance: group A (displacement ā„1 cm, n=23) and group B (displacement <1 cm, n=23). Postoperative functional recovery indicators were compared, including time to first straight leg raise, time to first ambulation, fracture healing time, Harris hip scores at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively, and excellent rate of Harris score at final follow-up. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) No significant differences in preoperative general data between the two groups (P > 0.05). (2) Group A had significantly longer time to first straight leg raise (18.44±3.99 days vs. 15.91±3.64 days, P < 0.05) and time to first ambulation (7.83±1.92 days vs. 6.70±1.80 days, P < 0.05) compared to group B. However, fracture healing time showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). (3) Harris scores in group B were significantly higher than group A at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), but no significant differences at 9 and 12 months (P > 0.05). (4) At final follow-up, excellent rate of Harris score (ā„90) was 74% in group A and 87% in group B, with no significant difference (P > 0.05). (5) These findings indicate that elderly patients with different lesser trochanter displacement distances have different functional recovery within 6 months postoperatively, but after 6 months, the displaced lesser trochanter does not affect hip function. Therefore, routine reduction and fixation of the lesser trochanter is not recommended for elderly intertrochanteric fracture patients. However, for patients with high early functional demands, reduction and fixation may be considered after individual assessment of activity needs and physical condition.