🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21623Original Research

TiRobot navigation versus conventional minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for treating thoracolumbar spine fractures

Xue Ningning¹,Zhao Yibo¹,Zhao Xiaofeng¹,Qi Detai¹,Wang Haomin¹,Zhao Bin¹

Department of Orthopedics, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi Province, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
TiRobot navigation versus conventional minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for treating thoracolumbar spine fractures
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1905, Issue 33 • pp. 100-112Citation:Xue Ningning et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • TiRobot-assisted navigation significantly improves pedicle screw placement accuracy (95.4% vs. 86.0%) and reduces facet joint violation rate (2.8% vs. 10.5%) compared to conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. • Intraoperative fluoroscopy time is significantly reduced with TiRobot navigation, lowering radiation exposure for patients and surgical staff. • No significant differences were observed in operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, or clinical outcomes (VAS, ODI, radiological parameters) between the two techniques. • TiRobot navigation provides equivalent early clinical efficacy while offering superior precision and structural protection, supporting its use in minimally invasive thoracolumbar fracture surgery.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The precision of pedicle screw placement directly impacts the prognosis of minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar fractures. Given the technological disparity between TiRobot assisted intelligent navigation and conventional C-arm 2D fluoroscopy, this study focuses on neurologically intact cases to demonstrate the former’s advantages through multidimensional evaluation of screw placement accuracy, surgical efficiency, and perioperative clinical metrics. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under the guidance of the TiRobot system with traditional percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using "C" arm X-ray fluoroscopy for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures without associated nerve injury. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 37 patients with single-segment thoracolumbar fractures treated surgically at the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from November 2022 to March 2024. The trial group (the TiRobot-assisted group) included 18 patients (10 males, 8 females) with a total of 108 pedicle screws; the control group (traditional C-arm fluoroscopy group) included 19 patients (12 males, 7 females) with a total of 114 pedicle screws. General information, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, postoperative hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), anterior vertebral height percentage, sagittal Cobb angle, screw placement accuracy, and facet joint violation rate were compared between the two groups preoperatively and at 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) There were no significant differences between the two groups in general information, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, VAS, ODI, anterior vertebral height percentage, or sagittal Cobb angle (all P > 0.05). (2) The intraoperative fluoroscopy time in the trial group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05). (3) The screw placement accuracy in the trial group was 95.4% and the facet joint violation rate was 2.8%, while in the control group these were 86.0% and 10.5%, respectively; the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). (4) TiRobot-assisted navigation for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation offers higher screw placement accuracy, better protection of posterior spinal structures such as facet joints, and significantly reduces radiation exposure time for both patients and medical staff compared to conventional methods.

1. Introduction

The thoracolumbar junction, as a transition zone from the relatively rigid thoracic spine to the more mobile lumbar spine, is subjected to significant biomechanical stress and is therefore more prone to fractures [1-3]. If not treated promptly, patients may experience persistent thoracolumbar pain or kyphotic deformity, and in severe cases, neurological deficits leading to muscle weakness, dysfunction, or even paralysis [4]. In clinical practice, the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) plays an important role in guiding treatment decisions. When the TLICS score is greater than 4 and the spine is significantly unstable, surgical intervention is recommended; when the score is less than 4, conservative treatment is preferred; and when the score equals 4, the decision is based on the patient's specific clinical condition [5-6]. Anterior and posterior pedicle screw fixation is the mainstream surgical approach, achieving vertebral reduction through a screw-rod system, effectively restoring spinal stability and correcting kyphotic deformity.

Spinal fracture reduction and fixation can be performed via open or minimally invasive approaches. Open surgery requires extensive dissection of paraspinal muscles, often leading to significant tissue damage, greater blood loss, longer operative time, and slower recovery [7-8]. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, the Wiltse paraspinal approach, which uses blunt dissection between the multifidus and longissimus muscles, significantly reduces muscle injury and lowers the incidence of postoperative chronic pain, offering advantages such as less trauma, reduced bleeding, and faster rehabilitation [9]. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, as proposed by Magerl et al., is minimally invasive with less tissue damage, reduced blood loss, lower infection risk, and quicker recovery; however, it is technically demanding due to the lack of direct visualization, and often requires multiple fluoroscopic images, increasing radiation exposure for both patients and medical staff [10-11]. Therefore, improving screw placement accuracy, shortening operative time, and reducing radiation exposure have become core technical goals in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

In recent years, the integration of artificial intelligence and medical engineering has promoted the development of orthopedic robot navigation systems, which enhance surgical precision and safety through three-dimensional preoperative planning, real-time navigation, and precise positioning. Currently, the main orthopedic robots in clinical use include Mazor Renaissance (Mazor Robotics, Israel), ROSA (Zimmer Biomet, France), and the TiRobot (Beijing TINAVI Medical Technologies, China) [12]. The TiRobot, leveraging a computer navigation system and a stable robotic arm, eliminates the instability caused by surgeon tremor and hand movements, thereby improving surgical precision. It has been widely adopted in many hospitals in China [13]. This study retrospectively analyzes 37 patients with single-segment thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficits who underwent surgery at the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from November 2022 to March 2024, comparing the clinical efficacy of TiRobot-assisted navigation versus conventional C-arm fluoroscopy in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Xue Ningning, Zhao Yibo, Zhao Xiaofeng, Qi Detai, Wang Haomin, Zhao Bin (2026). TiRobot navigation versus conventional minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for treating thoracolumbar spine fractures. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21623
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main advantage of TiRobot navigation over conventional C-arm fluoroscopy in thoracolumbar fracture surgery?

TiRobot navigation significantly improves pedicle screw placement accuracy (95.4% vs. 86.0%) and reduces facet joint violation rate (2.8% vs. 10.5%), while also reducing intraoperative fluoroscopy time, thereby lowering radiation exposure for both patients and medical staff.

Does TiRobot navigation reduce operation time or blood loss compared to conventional methods?

No significant differences were observed in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, or postoperative hospital stay between TiRobot-assisted and conventional C-arm fluoroscopy groups. The main benefits are improved accuracy and reduced radiation exposure.

What are the clinical outcomes after TiRobot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation?

Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), anterior vertebral height percentage, and sagittal Cobb angle, showed no significant differences between TiRobot and conventional groups at 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, indicating equivalent early clinical efficacy.

Is TiRobot navigation suitable for all thoracolumbar fracture patients?

This study focused on patients with single-segment thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficits. TiRobot navigation may be particularly beneficial for cases requiring high precision and minimal radiation exposure, but its applicability should be assessed on an individual basis, considering factors such as fracture type and surgeon experience.

What is the learning curve for TiRobot navigation?

The study did not specifically analyze the learning curve, but it is acknowledged that there is a learning curve for adopting robotic navigation. With training and experience, surgeons can effectively utilize the system to achieve high accuracy and efficiency.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF