Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• SuperPATH approach significantly reduces perioperative total and hidden blood loss compared to posterolateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for elderly unstable femoral neck fractures. • Combined local and intravenous tranexamic acid effectively reduces perioperative blood loss in both SuperPATH and posterolateral approaches. • The use of tranexamic acid does not increase the risk of lower extremity venous thrombosis. • SuperPATH approach offers a minimally invasive alternative that may improve postoperative recovery in elderly patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative blood loss in hip hemiarthroplasty is reduced with the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach compared with the posterolateral approach, but the difference in hidden blood loss between the two approaches and the effect of tranexamic acid on it has not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach reduces perioperative hidden blood loss in hip hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral neck fractures in advanced age compared with the posterolateral approach and to analyze the effect of combined local and intravenous tranexamic acid on it. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed a total of 200 elderly unstable femoral neck fracture patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty in the Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2024. They were divided into four groups (n=50 per group) according to the surgical approach and whether tranexamic acid was used in the perioperative period: (1) posterolateral approach group; (2) posterolateral approach + tranexamic acid group (combined local and intravenous tranexamic acid); (3) supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach group; (4) supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach + tranexamic acid group (combined local and intravenous tranexamic acid). General data including age, sex, height, weight, and surgical side, as well as preoperative hemoglobin, hematocrit, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and fibrinogen were collected. Hemoglobin and hematocrit were measured on postoperative day 3, and total blood loss and hidden blood loss were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative general data among the four groups. (2) The total blood loss and hidden blood loss on postoperative day 3 in the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach group were significantly lower than those in the posterolateral approach group (P < 0.05). (3) The total blood loss and hidden blood loss in the posterolateral approach + tranexamic acid group were significantly lower than those in the posterolateral approach group without tranexamic acid (P < 0.05). (4) The total blood loss and hidden blood loss in the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach + tranexamic acid group were significantly lower than those in the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach group without tranexamic acid (P < 0.05). (5) The incidence of lower extremity venous thrombosis was very low in all groups, with no statistically significant difference among groups. (6) These findings suggest that compared with the traditional posterolateral approach, the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach for hip hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with unstable femoral neck fractures can reduce perioperative total blood loss and hidden blood loss; combined local and intravenous tranexamic acid can reduce perioperative blood loss in both traditional and supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approaches without increasing the risk of thrombosis.
1. Introduction
Currently, for elderly femoral neck fractures, especially unstable types (Garden type III or IV), hip hemiarthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty) has become the preferred method [1-6]. However, traditional surgical approaches for hemiarthroplasty have their own disadvantages, especially a large amount of hidden blood loss, which often leads to postoperative anemia, increased transfusion rates, relatively longer recovery time, and increased long-term mortality [7]. Hidden blood loss typically occurs in major surgical procedures and is defined as the blood loss discovered by subtracting visible blood loss from total blood loss [8]. Studies have found that hidden blood loss accounts for a large proportion of total blood loss in hip arthroplasty [9].
In 2011, CHOW et al. [10] first reported the supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach (SuperPATH), which combines the percutaneous tube technique for acetabular preparation via the PATH approach and the in-situ femoral preparation via the SuperCap approach. It enters the hip joint capsule through the interval between the gluteus medius/piriformis and gluteus minimus, without cutting muscles, thereby maximizing protection of the capsule and other soft tissues around the hip, truly meeting the criteria of minimally invasive surgery [11]. Numerous studies have shown that the SuperPATH technique has several advantages, such as low complication rates, satisfactory radiological outcomes, shortened hospital stay, and good early functional recovery [12-13]. A recent meta-analysis indicated that patients over 70 years old are more likely to benefit from SuperPATH hemiarthroplasty, and thus it is recommended to widely consider minimally invasive SuperPATH hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients [14]. However, studies on whether SuperPATH can reduce perioperative total and hidden blood loss in hemiarthroplasty have yielded inconsistent results [15-18].
Tranexamic acid is a synthetic lysine amino acid derivative and is one of the most commonly used hemostatic agents, reducing fibrinolytic activity by lowering plasma plasminogen levels [19]. Clinical work and studies have found that combined local and intravenous use of tranexamic acid can reduce hidden blood loss in hip arthroplasty [20-21]. Although the specific mechanism is not fully understood, it is known that this effect is related not only to reduced fibrinolytic activity but also to its anti-inflammatory effects [22]. Although tranexamic acid has been proven to reduce blood loss in orthopedic surgeries and is safe regarding coagulation-related complications, its specific local and intravenous application regimen and actual clinical efficacy in SuperPATH hemiarthroplasty have not been reported.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
WANG Yi-jun, ZHANG Wei-cheng, WU Xiao-yang, JU Zheng-ye, ZHU Feng, ZHOU Jun, LI Rong-qun, XU Yao-zeng, ZHANG Lian-fang (2026). Supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip approach combined with local and intravenous tranexamic acid reduces perioperative hidden blood loss in hemiarthroplasty. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21619
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the SuperPATH approach?
SuperPATH (supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip) is a minimally invasive surgical approach for hip arthroplasty that preserves muscles and soft tissues by entering the hip joint capsule through the interval between the gluteus medius/piriformis and gluteus minimus, without cutting muscles.
How does tranexamic acid reduce blood loss in hip surgery?
Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss by inhibiting fibrinolysis, thereby stabilizing blood clots. It can be administered locally and intravenously, and combined use has been shown to reduce both total and hidden blood loss in hip arthroplasty without increasing the risk of thrombosis.
What are the advantages of SuperPATH over the posterolateral approach?
SuperPATH offers several advantages over the posterolateral approach, including reduced perioperative blood loss (both total and hidden), less soft tissue damage, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay, making it particularly beneficial for elderly patients.
Is tranexamic acid safe in terms of thrombosis risk?
Yes, in this study, the incidence of lower extremity venous thrombosis was very low and not significantly different between groups, indicating that combined local and intravenous tranexamic acid does not increase the risk of thrombosis.
What is hidden blood loss and why is it important?
Hidden blood loss is the blood loss that is not visible during surgery and is calculated by subtracting visible blood loss from total blood loss. It is important because it can lead to postoperative anemia and increased transfusion rates, affecting patient recovery and outcomes.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.