🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21614Original Research

Interactive biomechanical effects between medial meniscus anterior horn transverse tears and osteoarthritic degeneration: a finite element simulation analysis

CHEN Jiahao¹,ZHANG Jiahao¹,TIAN Jiaqing¹,XIANG Ruian¹,WANG Shuai¹,XU Xuemeng¹

Fifth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510095, Guangdong Province, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Interactive biomechanical effects between medial meniscus anterior horn transverse tears and osteoarthritic degeneration: a finite element simulation analysis
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1905, Issue 33 • pp. 100-112Citation:CHEN Jiahao et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Reduced bone mass and osteoporosis significantly increase joint stress loads in both normal and injured medial meniscus models under static standing. • Medial meniscus anterior horn transverse tears progressively increase stress on femoral cartilage and menisci, while tibial cartilage stress decreases with bone loss. • Subchondral bone exhibits elevated stress and strain under reduced bone density, particularly after meniscus injury, indicating a synergistic biomechanical effect. • The study highlights the need to consider bone density status in clinical treatment strategies for meniscus tears to prevent osteoarthritis progression.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meniscus injury, as a significant contributing factor to knee joint degeneration, can accelerate the progression of osteoarthritis through anterior horn tears that alter joint stress distribution. Existing studies primarily focus on biomechanical changes in normal bone conditions, while the regulatory role of different bone conditions on the injury mechanism remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of medial meniscus anterior horn transverse tears on the biomechanical differences of knee joints with varying bone conditions. METHODS: Imaging data of the lower limb from a healthy adult were used to construct a normal knee joint model in Mimics 2017. The model was further optimized and assembled using Geomagic Studio 2017 and SolidWorks 2017, and a medial meniscus anterior horn transverse tear model was established. Material properties were assigned in Ansys Workbench 2017, and three finite element models were created to simulate normal bone, reduced bone mass, and osteoporosis conditions. The models were validated using anterior drawer and axial loading tests. With the femur constrained and the distal tibia fixed, a 1000 N axial compressive load was applied to calculate stress peaks and strain distributions. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Under static standing conditions, both normal and injured medial meniscus models showed significantly higher joint stress loads in reduced bone mass and osteoporosis groups compared to normal bone mass group. (2) The medial meniscus anterior horn transverse tear model exhibited a progressive increase in stress loads on femoral cartilage and both menisci compared to the normal model, while stress on tibial cartilage surfaces decreased with bone mass reduction. In the meniscus injury model, stress concentrated at the tear edges. (3) Subchondral bone regions showed elevated stress levels under reduced bone mass conditions, especially after medial meniscus injury, with significantly increased strain distribution range and equivalent stress peaks (P < 0.05). (4) These findings suggest that medial meniscus anterior horn transverse tears under reduced bone density exacerbate joint contact area reduction and local stress concentration, potentially leading to increased local strain in tibial subchondral bone, indicating an interactive biomechanical effect between bone degeneration and meniscus injury. This provides a reference for meniscus repair strategies considering bone quality differences.

1. Introduction

The meniscus is a crucial biomechanical structure of the knee joint, primarily responsible for shock absorption, load transmission, joint lubrication, and improving the congruity between the femur and tibia [1-2]. Its core function is to distribute gravitational loads over a larger articular cartilage surface, thereby reducing excessive stress on the cartilage. Additionally, it limits hyperextension and hyperflexion of the knee, promotes synovial circulation, and enhances joint stability [3-4]. Meniscus tears are common structural injuries of the knee, with medial meniscus injuries occurring more frequently than lateral ones [5]. The ability of the meniscus to transmit axial loads depends on the integrity of the knee joint structures [6-7]. When a complete tear occurs, the meniscus's capacity to convert axial loads into hoop stresses is significantly diminished, leading to joint pain, reduced stability [8], and an increased risk of moderate-to-severe cartilage damage in the medial femoral condyle. Research has confirmed that this pathological change is a key mechanism in the progression of osteoarthritis [9].

Current studies have found that osteoarthritis and osteoporosis often exhibit a synergistic trend, with certain correlations in pathological mechanisms and clinical manifestations [10]. Osteoporosis leads to reduced bone mass and disruption of trabecular bone architecture, thereby decreasing joint stability and load-bearing capacity. This change may further affect the stress distribution on articular cartilage, accelerating the onset and progression of osteoarthritis [11]. Existing research indicates that osteoporosis not only exacerbates degenerative changes in osteoarthritis but also makes patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears more susceptible to osteonecrosis complications [12]. Notably, this risk is particularly pronounced in spontaneous osteoporosis cases, suggesting that osteoporosis may play a significant role in the disease outcome after meniscus injury.

Human finite element models are three-dimensional simulation models based on medical imaging data and anatomical details. Through finite element analysis, these models can non-invasively provide and reproduce human biomechanical data and visualize tissue stress distributions.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
CHEN Jiahao, ZHANG Jiahao, TIAN Jiaqing, XIANG Ruian, WANG Shuai, XU Xuemeng (2026). Interactive biomechanical effects between medial meniscus anterior horn transverse tears and osteoarthritic degeneration: a finite element simulation analysis. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21614
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main objective of this study?

The main objective is to investigate the effect of medial meniscus anterior horn transverse tears on the biomechanical differences of knee joints with varying bone conditions, specifically comparing normal bone, reduced bone mass, and osteoporosis.

How was the finite element model constructed and validated?

The model was constructed using imaging data from a healthy adult, processed with Mimics, Geomagic Studio, and SolidWorks. Validation was performed using anterior drawer and axial loading tests to ensure the model's reliability.

What are the key findings regarding stress distribution?

The study found that reduced bone mass and osteoporosis increase joint stress loads, and meniscus tears further elevate stress on femoral cartilage and menisci while decreasing tibial cartilage stress. Subchondral bone showed elevated stress and strain under reduced bone density, especially after meniscus injury.

What is the clinical significance of this research?

The findings highlight an interactive biomechanical effect between bone degeneration and meniscus injury, suggesting that clinical treatment strategies for meniscus tears should consider the patient's bone density status to prevent osteoarthritis progression.

What are the limitations and future directions mentioned?

The study suggests future work could include cadaveric biomechanical testing, comparison of different tear types, and dynamic loading models to validate the static simulation results and explore multi-dimensional interactions.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF