🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21516Original Research

Correlation between lower limb biomechanics during single-leg landing and hip joint muscle strength in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

YANG Zimeng¹,ZHENG Hongrong¹,YU Hao¹,GAO Peng¹,SUN Lezhong¹,SHENG Xiangmei¹

Shandong Vocational University of Foreign Affairs, Weihai 264500, Shandong Province, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Correlation between lower limb biomechanics during single-leg landing and hip joint muscle strength in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1905, Issue 33 • pp. 100-112Citation:YANG Zimeng et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, muscle strength on the surgical side had not recovered to the level of the healthy side, possibly due to neural inhibition. • Patients adopted a buffering strategy recruiting hip joint muscle strength to actively reduce vertical ground reaction force during single-leg landing. • The smaller hip abduction moment peak on the surgical side reduced knee joint stability in the coronal plane. • Continued hip and knee muscle strength training, especially hip abduction, extension, and knee flexion, extension, is recommended for at least 2 years post-surgery.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recovery of knee joint function and muscle strength is a key focus of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, abnormal inter-joint mechanical patterns of the lower limbs may alter lower limb biomechanics during movement and increase the risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury. OBJECTIVE: To explore the lower limb biomechanical characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients during single-leg landing 2 years after surgery, and their correlation with hip joint muscle strength. METHODS: Totally 23 subjects who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were randomly recruited. The Qualisys three-dimensional motion capture system and AMTI three-dimensional force platforms were used to capture kinematic and kinetic data of both lower limbs during single-leg landing. The Biodex isokinetic muscle testing system was used to measure muscle strength of both hip and knee joints at an angular velocity of 60°/s. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare bilateral lower limb joint biomechanical characteristics and isokinetic muscle strength of hip and knee joints. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between kinetic data during single-leg landing and isokinetic muscle strength of hip and knee joints. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) During single-leg landing, the surgical side showed smaller knee extension angle at initial contact, knee flexion/extension range of motion, vertical ground reaction force, hip extension, hip abduction, and knee extension peak moments, and larger hip flexion angle at initial contact and hip flexion/extension range of motion. (2) At 60°/s, the surgical side showed significantly reduced hip abduction, hip extension, knee flexion, and knee extension muscle torques. (3) The peak vertical ground reaction force and hip extension moment on the surgical side were significantly correlated with hip abduction muscle strength, while the peak knee extension moment on the surgical side was significantly correlated with hip abduction, flexion, and extension muscle strength. (4) These results indicate that 2 years after surgery, muscle strength on the surgical side had not recovered to the level of the healthy side, possibly related to neural inhibition caused by surgery. Patients adopted a buffering strategy recruiting hip joint muscle strength to actively reduce vertical ground reaction force during single-leg landing, but the smaller hip abduction moment peak on the surgical side also reduced knee joint stability in the coronal plane. Therefore, it is recommended that hip and knee muscle strength training, especially hip abduction, extension, and knee flexion, extension muscle strength, be continued for 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, along with targeted neuromuscular training and motor technique guidance to improve neuromuscular control during movement and avoid negative effects of maladaptive strategies.

1. Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament injury is one of the most common knee injuries, often occurring in sports involving sudden stops, side cuts, and jump landings [1]. Anterior cruciate ligament injury can lead to knee pain, limited range of motion, instability, and accelerate the occurrence of degenerative diseases such as knee osteoarthritis [2]. Therefore, the focus of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament injury is to restore knee function and sports performance.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a common treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injury, with good results in restoring knee function and sports performance. Despite undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, many patients still cannot return to their pre-injury sports level. Surveys show that less than 45% of patients return to their pre-injury sports level after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [3], and within 2 years after injury, the incidence of secondary anterior cruciate ligament injury is more than 6 times that of the initial injury [4]. However, 2 years after surgery, the risk of complications or sequelae gradually decreases [5]. Therefore, 2 years is a critical period for rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Lower limb biomechanical characteristics and neuromuscular adaptations similar to the initial injury are major risk factors for secondary anterior cruciate ligament injury [6]. Patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction typically undergo physical and sports rehabilitation to enhance lower limb muscle strength, improve neuromuscular control, and prognosis [7]. Previous studies have found that movements such as running, single-leg hopping, triple hopping, and cross-over hopping increase the incidence of secondary anterior cruciate ligament injury by more than 4 times [8], especially single-leg landing, which has a sensitivity of up to 78% in predicting anterior cruciate ligament injury [9]. Therefore, exploring the differences in bilateral lower limb biomechanical characteristics during single-leg landing 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is particularly important for understanding the mechanisms of secondary anterior cruciate ligament injury. During landing, the load on the anterior cruciate ligament may depend on the impact force on the lower limbs and the buffering mode adopted [10]. Thus, previous studies have explored the relationship between biomechanical characteristics of single-leg landing, vertical jumps, and anterior cruciate ligament injury from aspects such as vertical ground reaction force, neuromuscular control, and knee joint load. However, with deeper research, more attention has been paid to the role of hip joint muscle strength in knee stability and injury risk.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
YANG Zimeng, ZHENG Hongrong, YU Hao, GAO Peng, SUN Lezhong, SHENG Xiangmei (2026). Correlation between lower limb biomechanics during single-leg landing and hip joint muscle strength in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21516
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main finding of this study?

The study found that 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, muscle strength on the surgical side had not fully recovered, and patients adopted a buffering strategy during single-leg landing that reduced vertical ground reaction force but also decreased knee stability in the coronal plane.

Why is hip joint muscle strength important after ACL reconstruction?

Hip joint muscle strength is crucial for maintaining knee stability and normal function. After ACL reconstruction, hip muscle strength can improve hip stability and also play a role in improving gait and movement patterns, making it a key component of rehabilitation.

What are the implications of this study for rehabilitation?

The study suggests that continued hip and knee muscle strength training, especially hip abduction, extension, and knee flexion, extension, is recommended for at least 2 years post-surgery, along with neuromuscular training and motor technique guidance to improve neuromuscular control and avoid maladaptive strategies.

What methods were used in this study?

The study recruited 23 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. They used a Qualisys motion capture system and AMTI force platforms to collect kinematic and kinetic data during single-leg landing, and a Biodex isokinetic system to measure hip and knee muscle strength at 60°/s. Paired t-tests and Pearson correlations were used for analysis.

What are the limitations of this study?

The study did not address potential adaptive changes in the healthy side biomechanics, the influence of hip muscle mass, or the impact of maladaptive strategies on lower limb biomechanics during single-leg landing.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF