Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis exhibit significant increases in pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis, indicating spinopelvic sagittal imbalance with compensatory pelvic retroversion and lumbar hyperlordosis. • Plantar pressure distribution shifts anteriorly, with increased forefoot pressure and decreased rearfoot pressure, along with specific regional changes (increased left first metatarsal peak pressure, decreased right fifth metatarsal and left arch peak pressures), suggesting foot mechanical asymmetry and instability. • Center of pressure trajectory parameters (length, 95% confidence ellipse area, and average X/Y axis movement) are significantly increased under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, indicating impaired postural control and increased visual dependence. • The study provides biomechanical evidence for the link between spinopelvic sagittal imbalance and plantar pressure changes, supporting the inclusion of plantar pressure analysis in early screening and rehabilitation assessment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common spinal degenerative disorder among older adults, often accompanied by spinopelvic sagittal imbalance. The characteristics of plantar pressure and balance function in these patients have not been fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the spinopelvic sagittal parameters and plantar pressure characteristics in older adults with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, to provide a reference for early diagnosis and the development of rehabilitation plans in older adults with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: A total of 33 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group) and 35 healthy older adults (control group) were enrolled. Lateral radiographs of the whole spine were obtained to measure spinopelvic sagittal parameters. Plantar pressure distribution, including the pressure ratio, peak pressure in eight regions of interest, and center of pressure trajectory parameters, was collected using a plantar pressure system. Differences in spinopelvic sagittal parameters, center of pressure trajectory, and plantar pressure parameters were compared between the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Compared with the control group, the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group showed significantly increased pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis (P < 0.05). The pressure ratio of the left forefoot and forefoot was significantly increased (P < 0.05), while that of the left rearfoot and rearfoot was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The peak pressure of the left first metatarsal was significantly increased (P < 0.05), while that of the right fifth metatarsal and left arch was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). Under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, the center of pressure trajectory length, 95% confidence ellipse area, and average X/Y axis movement distance were significantly increased in the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis exhibit characteristic changes in spinopelvic sagittal parameters (increased pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis), a forward shift in plantar pressure distribution (increased forefoot pressure, decreased rearfoot pressure), and imbalance in foot mechanical symmetry and the 'triangular support structure'. These changes are accompanied by decreased center of pressure stability, reflecting impaired balance function.
1. Introduction
Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common degenerative spinal disorder characterized by pathological intervertebral slippage, most frequently occurring at the L4-L5 segment [1]. In the Chinese elderly population, the prevalence of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis shows gender differences (19.1% in males, 25.0% in females), with males more prone to retrolisthesis [2]. Its pathogenesis is associated with degeneration of the disc-facet joint complex, developmental abnormalities, and spondylolysis [3-5]. Patients often present with mechanical low back pain, intermittent claudication, and radicular pain, due to reduced spinal canal volume caused by degeneration [6-7], leading to progressive motor dysfunction.
Biomechanical studies have revealed a close relationship between degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and spinopelvic sagittal imbalance. Mismatch between pelvic parameters such as pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis is a core feature of sagittal imbalance [8], with pelvic tilt (mainly retroversion) serving as a key compensatory mechanism to maintain sagittal balance in decompensated states [9-10]. Notably, these spinopelvic changes transmit downward through the biomechanical chain, ultimately affecting the mechanical environment of the lower limbs and feet. This top-down mechanical alteration leads to abnormal load transfer to the foot and ankle, directly manifesting as characteristic changes in plantar pressure distribution. Recent studies have shown significant associations between spinopelvic sagittal imbalance and plantar pressure distribution, such as anterior displacement of the center of pressure and abnormal peak pressure distribution [11]. Kinematically, patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis often exhibit characteristic gait changes due to anterior displacement of the center of gravity, including reduced cadence, gait speed, and stride length [12]. These gait adjustments lead to remodeling of plantar pressure distribution, and long-term pressure changes may induce foot structural abnormalities, such as progressive arch collapse, hallux valgus, and flatfoot [13-14]. Furthermore, chronic plantar pressure changes can affect proprioceptive-neuromuscular control, further aggravating spinal alignment through postural compensation, forming a vicious cycle of sensorimotor integration impairment and increasing fall risk [15-16].
Plantar pressure systems can visually display the center of pressure trajectory, allowing direct observation of postural sway and movement in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, and can be used to analyze and evaluate balance function. However, the application of plantar pressure analysis to degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is still limited.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
HAN Zijia, HE Xiaochen, WANG Jiarong, TIAN Yichao, WANG Lixin, GONG Shuhui (2026). Spinal-pelvic sagittal parameters and plantar pressure characteristics in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21518
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the key spinopelvic sagittal parameter changes in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis?
Compared with healthy controls, elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis show significantly increased pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis, indicating spinopelvic sagittal imbalance with compensatory pelvic retroversion and lumbar hyperlordosis.
How does plantar pressure distribution change in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis?
Plantar pressure distribution shifts anteriorly, with increased forefoot pressure and decreased rearfoot pressure. Regionally, the left first metatarsal peak pressure increases, while the right fifth metatarsal and left arch peak pressures decrease, suggesting foot mechanical asymmetry and instability.
What is the impact of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis on balance function?
Patients exhibit significantly increased center of pressure trajectory length, 95% confidence ellipse area, and average X/Y axis movement under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, indicating impaired postural control and increased visual dependence.
Why is plantar pressure analysis important for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis?
Plantar pressure analysis provides biomechanical evidence for the link between spinopelvic sagittal imbalance and foot pressure changes, and can be used for early screening and rehabilitation assessment to support individualized intervention.
What are the limitations of this study?
The study only included patients with L4-L5 single-segment spondylolisthesis, so conclusions may not be generalizable to other segments or multi-segment disease. Pain-related postural compensation and knee alignment were not assessed, which may influence the results.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.