Finite element analysis of biomechanical performance of a novel double-screw technique in lumbar revision of the original fixed segment
BACKGROUND: Currently, in clinical practice, the original internal fixation devices are often removed to perform revision surgery for failed vertebral fixation, which poses certain drawbacks and risks. The pedicle double-screw technique can preserve the original internal fixation devices, while the modified cortical bone trajectory technique offers excellent mechanical performance. Combining these two techniques for revision surgery can mitigate the conventional risks, although the mechanical performance of this new modified cortical bone trajectory technique in revision surgery is not yet well understood. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the mechanical performance of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) and modified cortical bone trajectory (MCBT) screw placement techniques combined with the double-screw technique in lumbar revision surgery using finite element analysis, and to explore the advantages of MCBT over CBT in revision surgery. METHODS: A three-dimensional model of L1-5 vertebrae, endplates, and intervertebral discs was established based on computed tomography data. Screws were placed following the traditional trajectory pedicle screw technique, and the models were divided into traditional trajectory initial group and loosening group based on different screw-bone contact forms. Revision was performed on the traditional trajectory loosening group using MCBT and CBT screws to re-fix the lumbar spine. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate the mechanical performance of MCBT and CBT in revision surgery. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, the CBT revision group showed reductions in range of motion (ROM) of 31.97%, 29.15%, 15.12%, and 29.63%, and reductions in intervertebral disc stress of 15.44%, 78.67%, 54.36%, and 40.55%, respectively, compared with the control group. (2) The MCBT revision group showed reductions in ROM of 32.16%, 29.33%, 15.47%, and 31.42%, and reductions in intervertebral disc stress of 16.25%, 83.00%, 64.82%, and 45.83%, respectively, compared with the control group. (3) Compared with the CBT revision group, the MCBT revision group showed reductions in ROM of 0.28%, 0.25%, 0.40%, and 2.54%, reductions in intervertebral disc stress of 0.96%, 20.25%, 22.91%, and 8.88%, reductions in vertebral body stress of 15.78%, 4.75%, 11.22%, and 7.42%, and reductions in screw-rod system stress of 0.15%, 9.80%, 1.04%, and 0.84%, respectively. (4) Both CBT and MCBT techniques effectively enhance the mechanical stability of the fixed segment in lumbar revision surgery, with MCBT showing superior overall performance, providing a new technical option for clinical lumbar revision.