🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Official PDF TranslationChinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research

TiRobot navigation versus conventional minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for treating thoracolumbar spine fractures

Authors: Xue Ningning; Zhao Yibo; Zhao Xiaofeng; Qi Detai; Wang Haomin; Zhao Bin

DOI: 10.12307/2026.21623Status: Verified Translated Edition
Sponsored AdvertisementAd Placement Area
reCAPTCHA Bot Shield Active

Preparing Secure Academic Download

Verifying human reader & generating high-resolution document...

Verifying Document Integrity15s remaining
← Back to Article
Protected by Google reCAPTCHA v3.PrivacyTerms
Sponsored ContentAdSense In-Feed Ad Slot

Key Findings in This Report

• TiRobot-assisted navigation significantly improves pedicle screw placement accuracy (95.4% vs. 86.0%) and reduces facet joint violation rate (2.8% vs. 10.5%) compared to conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. • Intraoperative fluoroscopy time is significantly reduced with TiRobot navigation, lowering radiation exposure for patients and surgical staff. • No significant differences were observed in operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, or clinical outcomes (VAS, ODI, radiological parameters) between the two techniques. • TiRobot navigation provides equivalent early clinical efficacy while offering superior precision and structural protection, supporting its use in minimally invasive thoracolumbar fracture surgery.