Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- ā¢ā¢ MSCs exhibit potent immunomodulatory and multipotent differentiation properties, positioning them as promising therapeutic agents for intestinal diseases. ⢠MSC-derived exosomes may modulate ZBP1-associated H3K27 acetylation to attenuate intestinal epithelial apoptosis, revealing a novel epigenetic regulatory axis. ⢠Clinical translation of MSC therapy faces challenges including standardization, delivery optimization, and long-term safety evaluation. ⢠Tissue engineering applications of MSCs represent cutting-edge advancements for intestinal repair and regeneration.
Abstract
Current therapeutic interventions for intestinal pathologies, including anti-inflammatory agents, immunosuppressants, and surgical procedures, frequently incur substantial adverse effects, elevated recurrence rates, and suboptimal tissue regeneration. Cellular therapy has emerged as a paradigm-shifting strategy, capitalizing on regenerative potential and immunomodulatory properties. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), distinguished by their potent immunoregulatory capacity and multipotent differentiation plasticity, have recently demonstrated remarkable therapeutic promise in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ischemiaāreperfusion injury, oncological interventions, and radio-chemotherapy-induced complications. This systematic review critically evaluates MSC biological characteristics, clinical translation progress, and cutting-edge advancements in tissue engineering applications. Mechanistic insights into MSC-mediated intestinal repair are elucidated, with particular emphasis on emerging evidence suggesting MSC-derived exosomes may modulate ZBP1-associated H3K27 acetylation to attenuate intestinal epithelial apoptosisāa novel epigenetic regulatory axis for gastrointestinal restitution. Future translational trajectories and clinical implementation challenges are comprehensively discussed.
1. Introduction
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a type of multipotent adult stem cell initially isolated from bone marrow and subsequently identified in diverse tissues, including adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood, placenta, and dental pulp [1] (Table 1). The term "MSCs" was first formally defined by Caplan in 1991 [2]. Prior to this designation, bone marrow-derived fibroblasts exhibiting osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation capacities were erroneously classified as MSCs [3]. Notably, the terminology "mesenchymal stromal cells" frequently coexists with "mesenchymal stem cells" in related literature. According to nomenclature guidelines established by the International Society for Cell Therapy (ISCT), both terms are abbreviated as MSCs and are considered functionally equivalent in most experimental contexts [4]. In 2006, ISCT established three minimal defining criteria for human MSCs: 1. Adherence to plastic under standard culture conditions; 2. Positive expression (>95%) of surface markers CD73, CD90, and CD105, with negative expression (<2%) of HLA-DR, CD14, CD34, CD45, CD116, CD79α, or CD19; 3. Multilineage differentiation potential into osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes under specific induction conditions [5]. Beyond their well-characterized differentiation capabilities, MSCs exhibit immunomodulatory properties, tissue-specific homing capacity, paracrine signaling functions, and remarkable tissue repair potential. These attributes collectively position MSCs as promising therapeutic agents for immune-mediated disorders and tissue regeneration applications.
Intestinal pathologies are commonly categorized into four major types: inflammatory disorders (such as Crohnās disease and ulcerative colitis), ischemic conditions (such as mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion injury), neoplastic diseases (such as colorectal cancer), and iatrogenic injuries (such as radiation/chemotherapy-induced enteritis). The disruption of intestinal barrier integrity constitutes the core pathological mechanism underlying these conditions. The intestinal barrier comprises mechanical, chemical, immune, and microbial components, with intestinal epithelial cells serving as its fundamental constituents. These polarized columnar epithelial cells form a continuous monolayer lining the intestinal lumen, consisting of absorptive enterocytes, mucin-secreting goblet cells, antimicrobial Paneth cells, and hormone-producing enteroendocrine cells, collectively orchestrating nutrient absorption, mucosal protection, and immune surveillance [6]. Epithelial barrier integrity is maintained through intercellular tight junction complexes and continuous cellular renewal (Table 2). Notably, intestinal epithelial cells exhibit remarka
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1ā5)...
Jia-Zhi Yang, Li-Yan He, Xian-Zhou Lu (2026). The therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells in intestinal diseases: from mechanisms to clinical translation. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-025-04523-y
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and why are they important for intestinal diseases?
MSCs are multipotent adult stem cells with potent immunomodulatory and regenerative properties. They have shown therapeutic promise in various intestinal conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and radiation-induced enteritis, by modulating immune responses and promoting tissue repair.
How do MSC-derived exosomes contribute to intestinal repair?
MSC-derived exosomes may modulate ZBP1-associated H3K27 acetylation, which attenuates intestinal epithelial apoptosis. This novel epigenetic regulatory axis represents a potential mechanism for gastrointestinal restitution.
What are the main challenges in translating MSC therapy to clinical practice for intestinal diseases?
Challenges include standardization of MSC sources and preparation, optimizing delivery methods, ensuring long-term safety and efficacy, and addressing regulatory and manufacturing hurdles.
What is the role of tissue engineering in MSC-based therapies for intestinal diseases?
Tissue engineering approaches combine MSCs with biomaterials and scaffolds to enhance cell survival, engraftment, and differentiation, thereby improving the regenerative outcomes for intestinal tissue repair.
What are the minimal criteria for defining human MSCs according to ISCT?
According to ISCT (2006), human MSCs must adhere to plastic under standard culture conditions, express CD73, CD90, and CD105 (>95%), lack expression of HLA-DR, CD14, CD34, CD45, CD116, CD79α, or CD19 (<2%), and differentiate into osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes under specific induction conditions.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.