🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21608Original Research

Postmenopausal cognitive impairment: a bibliometric analysis of developmental context and hot trends

Chen Xiaoxia¹,Zhao Lihua¹,Li Taowen¹,Qin Yimei¹,Liang JinyuĀ¹āœ‰

• Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China; First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Postmenopausal cognitive impairment: a bibliometric analysis of developmental context and hot trends
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1908, Issue 36 • pp. 100-112Citation:Chen Xiaoxia et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织巄程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • •• Annual publications on postmenopausal cognitive impairment have shown a fluctuating upward trend over the past two decades, indicating growing research interest. • The United States leads in research output, with top institutions including Stanford University, University of Pittsburgh, Harvard Medical School, and University of Illinois. • Hormonal interventions, particularly estrogen therapy and its long-term safety, remain the central focus, as evidenced by high-frequency and burst keywords. • Research themes have expanded from single topics like MRI and hormones to broader health issues (psychological, tumor risk, cardiovascular, metabolic, physical activity), with a shift toward non-hormonal intervention strategies.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At present, there are few longitudinal studies on postmenopausal cognitive impairment, and there is no systematic bibliometric analysis of its development context and hot trends. OBJECTIVE: To systematically integrate the related research on postmenopausal cognitive impairment with the help of bibliometric tools, identify the research trends and hot trends in this field, and promote interdisciplinary cooperation and clinical transformation. METHODS: The Web of Science Core Collection database was retrieved for literature related to postmenopausal cognitive impairment published from January 1, 2005 to March 24, 2025. Visualization analysis was conducted using software such as VOSviewer, the R package ā€œBibliometrix,ā€ and CiteSpace. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 1 452 articles were included, involving 71 countries, 1 830 institutions, 510 journals, and 6 909 authors. The annual publication volume showed a fluctuating upward trend. The United States dominated the field, with Stanford University, University of Pittsburgh, Harvard Medical School, and University of Illinois leading. Menopause-The Journal of the North American Menopause Society published the most articles (78), and JAMA-J Am Med Assoc had the highest co-citation count (3 791). Espeland, Mark A. ranked first with 55 publications, and Shumaker, Sally A. was the most co-cited author (859 times). High-frequency keyword ā€œestrogenā€ (211 times) and burst keywords ā€œplus progestinā€ (strength=15.77) and ā€œestrogen replacement therapyā€ (strength=15.57) indicated that the long-term effects and safety of hormonal interventions remained the core research focus. Keyword clustering revealed four research directions. Future research could focus on constructing a ā€œcross-life cycle-multidimensionalā€ framework, which would help comprehensively understand the mechanisms of hormones on cognitive function and neuropsychiatric status at different life stages. The shift in hot topics from single issues (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging, hormones and cognition) to multiple health issues (psychological, tumor risk, cardiovascular, metabolic diseases, physical activity, etc.) and the non-hormonal turn in intervention strategies reflected the development trend of the discipline.

1. Introduction

Postmenopausal cognitive impairment refers to cognitive decline in women after natural or surgical menopause (e.g., bilateral oophorectomy), primarily due to a sharp decrease in endogenous estrogen levels, compounded by aging and other factors. A US Chinese study showed that the prevalence (77.06%) and incidence (75.20%) of cognitive impairment in women aged 60 and above are higher than in men (22.94% and 24.80%, respectively). Postmenopausal women face an increased risk of cognitive disorders, including subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease. A study involving Latina women indicated that menstrual cycle and reproductive history significantly affect cognitive levels, further emphasizing the importance of cognitive health in postmenopausal women.

However, longitudinal studies on postmenopausal cognitive impairment are scarce, and no systematic integration of its developmental context and hot trends exists. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT), a key treatment, remains controversial regarding its efficacy and safety, particularly concerning long-term risks such as thrombosis and malignancy. Therefore, it is necessary to map the research landscape over the past 20 years to provide insights for researchers and reduce the risk of dementia in postmenopausal women.

Bibliometrics is a quantitative method for analyzing scientific literature, assessing impact, and identifying trends. This study focuses on postmenopausal cognitive impairment, systematically analyzing core output characteristics (countries, institutions, journals, authors, keywords) using VOSviewer, R package 'Bibliometrix', and CiteSpace. This approach provides a comprehensive, visualized overview of the field, identifies research hotspots and frontiers, and offers a foundation for future research.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Chen Xiaoxia, Zhao Lihua, Li Taowen, Qin Yimei, Liang Jinyu (2026). Postmenopausal cognitive impairment: a bibliometric analysis of developmental context and hot trends. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21608
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is postmenopausal cognitive impairment?

Postmenopausal cognitive impairment refers to cognitive decline in women after natural or surgical menopause, primarily due to a sharp decrease in endogenous estrogen levels, compounded by aging and other factors. It includes symptoms like memory loss and attention deficits, and increases the risk of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

What are the main findings of this bibliometric analysis?

The analysis included 1,452 articles from 2005 to 2025. The United States leads in research output, with top institutions like Stanford and Harvard. Hormonal interventions, especially estrogen therapy, remain the core focus. Research themes have expanded to include psychological, cardiovascular, and metabolic health, with a shift toward non-hormonal interventions.

Which journals and authors are most influential in this field?

The journal 'Menopause-The Journal of the North American Menopause Society' published the most articles (78), while 'JAMA-J Am Med Assoc' had the highest co-citation count (3,791). Espeland, Mark A. was the most prolific author (55 publications), and Shumaker, Sally A. was the most co-cited author (859 times).

What are the current research hotspots and trends?

Current hotspots include the long-term effects and safety of hormone therapy, as well as non-hormonal interventions such as physical activity and psychological approaches. Research themes are expanding from single topics like MRI and hormones to broader health issues, reflecting a multidisciplinary trend.

What are the future research directions suggested by this study?

Future research should focus on constructing a 'cross-life cycle-multidimensional' framework to understand the mechanisms of hormones on cognition across different life stages. Additionally, there is a need to validate the efficacy of non-hormonal interventions and accelerate the translation of clinical intervention protocols.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF