Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• MSCs transplantation alleviates hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury and enhances liver graft viability, addressing critical challenges in liver transplantation. • MSCs exhibit potent immunomodulatory effects on both adaptive and innate immune responses, interacting with T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells, Kupffer cells, and neutrophils. • Clinical progress indicates MSCs therapy can prevent acute graft-versus-host disease and promote liver regeneration in split LT, offering alternative strategies to donor shortage and immune rejection. • The review provides new insights into MSC-based adoptive cell therapy, highlighting their potential to improve LT outcomes and patient prognosis.
Abstract
Although liver transplantation (LT) is an effective strategy for end-stage liver diseases, the shortage of donor organs and the immune rejection hinder its widespread implementation in clinical practice. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplantation offers a promising approach for patients undergoing liver transplantation due to their immune regulatory capabilities, hepatic protection properties, and multidirectional differentiation potential. In this review, we summarize the potential applications of MSCs transplantation in various LT scenarios. MSCs transplantation has demonstrated effectiveness in alleviating hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury, enhancing the viability of liver grafts, preventing acute graft-versus-host disease, and promoting liver regeneration in split LT therapy. We also discuss the clinical progress, and explore the immunomodulatory functions of MSCs in response to both adaptive and innate immune responses. Furthermore, we emphasize the interactions between MSCs and different immune cells, including T cells, B cells, plasma cells, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, Kupffer cells, and neutrophils, to provide new insights into the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs in adoptive cell therapy.
1. Introduction
Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective life-saving procedure for multiple end-stage liver diseases, including acute liver failure, decompensated cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma [1, 2]. Despite the rapid development of LT techniques, there are still many problems and challenges, including donor shortage, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and immune rejection [3]. Consequently, most end-stage liver disease patients exceed the transplantation criteria or die while waiting for LT allocation [4]. To overcome these obstacles, several alternative methods have been effectively used to extend the clinical application of LT. For instance, marginal LT can partly compensate for the shortage of liver donors, although the poor outcomes associated with marginal LT (e.g., primary non-function) severely limit its broad application [5].
To reduce oxidative stress and hepatocyte apoptosis in ischemia-reperfusion injuries [6, 7], several corresponding measures, including shortening ischemic time, cold preservation, and the use of antioxidants have been employed [8–10]. However, extraneous ions or residues (e.g., potassium) derived from the preservative solution (e.g., UV solution) can severely cause cardiac arrest in LT patients. Although several immunosuppressants have been effectively used to alleviate the immune rejection throughout the entire process of LT [11–13], the unmanageable dosages of immunosuppressants due to individual differences often leads to excessive use, causing additional liver damage to liver transplant recipients [14]. Therefore, novel methods or drugs are still needed to improve LT efficiency and the prognosis of liver transplant recipients.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Fuli Wen, Guokai Yang, Saihua Yu, Haiyan Liu, Naishun Liao, Zhengfang Liu (2026). Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for liver transplantation: clinical progress and immunomodulatory properties. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-03943-6
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the role of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in liver transplantation?
MSCs transplantation offers a promising approach for patients undergoing liver transplantation due to their immune regulatory capabilities, hepatic protection properties, and multidirectional differentiation potential. They have demonstrated effectiveness in alleviating hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury, enhancing liver graft viability, preventing acute graft-versus-host disease, and promoting liver regeneration in split LT therapy.
How do MSCs modulate the immune response in liver transplantation?
MSCs exert immunomodulatory functions on both adaptive and innate immune responses. They interact with various immune cells including T cells, B cells, plasma cells, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, Kupffer cells, and neutrophils, thereby modulating the immune environment to reduce rejection and improve graft acceptance.
What are the clinical applications of MSCs in liver transplantation?
Clinical progress indicates that MSCs transplantation can be used to alleviate liver ischemia-reperfusion injury and inflammation, enhance the viability of liver grafts, prevent acute graft-versus-host disease, and promote liver regeneration in split liver transplantation. These applications address key challenges such as donor shortage and immune rejection.
What are the challenges in liver transplantation that MSCs therapy aims to overcome?
Liver transplantation faces challenges including donor shortage, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and immune rejection. MSCs therapy aims to overcome these by providing immunomodulatory and tissue regenerative benefits, potentially improving outcomes and expanding the applicability of transplantation.
What is the significance of this review on MSCs in liver transplantation?
This review summarizes the potential applications of MSCs transplantation in various liver transplantation scenarios, discusses clinical progress, and explores the immunomodulatory functions of MSCs. It provides new insights into the interactions between MSCs and immune cells, highlighting their potential in adoptive cell therapy to improve liver transplantation efficiency and patient prognosis.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.