🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21485Original Research

Mechanism of epothilone B improving spinal cord microcirculation after spinal cord injury in rats

Yin Haoran¹,Wang Fangyong¹

School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100071, China; Department of Spinal and Spinal Cord Surgery, Beijing Boai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Mechanism of epothilone B improving spinal cord microcirculation after spinal cord injury in rats
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1904, Issue 32 • pp. 100-112Citation:Yin Haoran et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Epothilone B significantly improves motor function recovery in rats after spinal cord injury, as evidenced by increased BBB scores, inclined plane test angles, and open field test distances. • Epothilone B enhances blood flow recovery and reduces spinal cord cavity area, indicating improved microcirculation and tissue preservation. • Epothilone B downregulates Toll-like receptor 4 and nuclear factor κB protein expression, suggesting attenuation of the inflammatory response. • Epothilone B upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 expression, promoting vascular endothelial cell regeneration and microcirculation reconstruction.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animal experiments have found that epothilone B can remodel blood microcirculation and reduce tissue scar formation after spinal cord injury, but the specific mechanism remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the mechanism by which epothilone B improves spinal cord microcirculation after spinal cord injury. METHODS: Fifty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into a sham-operated group (n=10), a spinal cord injury group (n=20), and an epothilone B group (n=20). The sham-operated group underwent only laminectomy at T10, while the other two groups were subjected to laminectomy at T10 followed by spinal cord contusion. Immediately after modeling, the epothilone B group received intraperitoneal injections of epothilone B solution, while the other two groups received corresponding solvents. At corresponding time points after modeling, motor function was assessed using Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) score, inclined plane test, and open field test; blood flow recovery in the posterior median spinal cord vessels was detected by laser speckle flow imaging; hematoxylin-eosin staining was used to evaluate the overall spinal cord tissue; Western blot was used to detect Toll-like receptor 4 and nuclear factor κB protein expression; immunofluorescence staining was used to detect vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and Toll-like receptor 4 expression in spinal cord injury tissue. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The BBB score in the epothilone B group was higher than that in the spinal cord injury group at 14 and 28 days after modeling (P < 0.05), the inclined plane test angle was greater than that in the spinal cord injury group at 28 days after modeling (P < 0.05), and the open field test moving distance was greater than that in the spinal cord injury group at 14 and 28 days after modeling (P < 0.05), indicating that epothilone B improved motor function in rats with spinal cord injury. Laser speckle flow imaging at 28 days after modeling showed that epothilone B increased blood flow recovery in spinal cord injury rats. Hematoxylin-eosin staining at 28 days after modeling showed that the spinal cord cavity area in the epothilone B group was smaller than that in the spinal cord injury group (P < 0.05). Western blot at 5 days after modeling showed that the expression of Toll-like receptor 4 and nuclear factor κB protein in the spinal cord injury group was higher than that in the sham-operated group and epothilone B group (P < 0.05). Immunofluorescence staining at 5 days after modeling showed that the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in the spinal cord injury group was lower than that in the sham-operated group and epothilone B group (P < 0.05), while the expression of Toll-like receptor 4 was higher than that in the sham-operated group and epothilone B group (P < 0.05). (2) These results indicate that epothilone B may reduce local inflammation after spinal cord injury by regulating the Toll-like receptor 4 and nuclear factor κB pathway, ensuring the regeneration of vascular endothelial cells in spinal cord tissue, thereby promoting the reconstruction of blood microcirculation.

1. Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) has a distinct pathological process characterized by a biphasic pattern comprising primary mechanical injury and secondary pathological injury [1-5]. Biomechanical trauma causing three-dimensional spinal instability can directly lead to structural damage such as neural tissue tearing and axonal transection, with the degree of injury positively correlated with impact kinetic energy. Within 24-72 hours after this phase, a cellular inflammatory molecular cascade is initiated, characterized by: (1) disruption of cellular integrity in the injured area, releasing endogenous ligands for Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) such as heat shock proteins and extracellular matrix degradation components, which activate downstream nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) via classical pathways, leading to increased expression of interleukins and tumor necrosis factor α, and inducing neutrophil infiltration [6-7]; (2) neutrophil infiltration and M1 microglial activation forming an inflammatory microenvironment, further increasing secretion of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor α, promoting TLR4 and NF-κB pathway expression, creating a positive feedback loop [7-8]; (3) the inflammatory environment leading to ischemia and hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, decreased intracellular ATP levels, and generation of reactive oxygen species and free radicals, triggering calcium overload and inducing apoptosis [9]; (4) free radical chain reactions causing lipid peroxidation, resulting in myelin sheath disintegration [10]. This vicious cycle ultimately leads to delayed neuronal apoptosis and irreversible neurological deficits [10]. Long-term clinical practice indicates that the majority of primary injuries in SCI patients result from diseases or accidents, making clinical prevention and intervention difficult. Notably, a series of effective clinical interventions have been developed targeting the secondary injury process, which can slow the progression of secondary injury through multi-target mechanisms, thereby achieving protective treatment for residual neurological function.

Clinical observations show that neurological function repair and complication prevention in SCI patients involve dual intervention pathways: direct repair strategies centered on reconstructing neural signal transmission, and indirect protective mechanisms by blocking secondary injury cascades [11-12]. Evidence-based medicine has confirmed that three types of interventions can be used for direct repair: (1) surgical decompression to relieve mechanical compression on neural tissue; (2) application of neurotrophic factors combined with physical therapy to promote axonal regeneration; (3) transplantation of exogenous neural precursor cells to reconstruct neural conduction pathways. In the field of indirect protection, regulatory strategies involve three key links: blocking the inflammatory cascade through anti-inflammatory therapy, using vascular

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Yin Haoran, Wang Fangyong (2026). Mechanism of epothilone B improving spinal cord microcirculation after spinal cord injury in rats. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21485
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main finding of this study on epothilone B and spinal cord injury?

The study demonstrates that epothilone B improves motor function recovery, enhances blood flow recovery, reduces spinal cord cavity area, and modulates the TLR4/NF-κB pathway and VEGF receptor 2 expression in rats after spinal cord injury, suggesting a mechanism involving anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic effects.

How does epothilone B affect the inflammatory response after spinal cord injury?

Epothilone B downregulates the expression of Toll-like receptor 4 and nuclear factor κB, key components of the inflammatory signaling pathway, thereby reducing local inflammation after spinal cord injury.

What is the role of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in this study?

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 expression is upregulated by epothilone B treatment, which may promote vascular endothelial cell regeneration and contribute to the reconstruction of blood microcirculation in the injured spinal cord.

What experimental model was used in this study?

A rat model of T10 spinal cord contusion was used. Fifty Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into sham-operated, spinal cord injury, and epothilone B treatment groups.

What are the potential clinical implications of this research?

The findings suggest that epothilone B, a microtubule-stabilizing drug, could be a potential therapeutic agent for spinal cord injury by modulating inflammation and promoting microcirculation, although further studies are needed to translate these results to clinical settings.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF