Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Inhaled MSC-EVs significantly ameliorate lung ischemia-reperfusion injury, showing superior efficacy compared to intravenous delivery. • MSC-EVs promote macrophage polarization from pro-inflammatory M1 to anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. • miR-22-3p within MSC-EVs directly targets NLRP3, suppressing the NLRP3/Caspase-1/IL-1β pathway. • Therapeutic efficacy of MSC-EVs is confirmed in a clinically relevant rat orthotopic lung transplantation model.
Abstract
Background: Lung ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI) is a major contributor to primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents in inflammatory diseases by ameliorating tissue damage and promoting repair. However, the anti-inflammatory efficacy of these approaches and the underlying mechanisms in lung ischemia–reperfusion injury remain incompletely understood. Methods: The protective effects of mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) against lung ischemia–reperfusion injury were evaluated using two delivery approaches, inhalation and intravenous injection. Both in vivo and in vitro models were employed to assess the biological activity of MSC-EVs and to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. In addition, a rat orthotopic lung transplantation (OLT) model was established to further examine the translational relevance of MSC-EVs. Results: MSC–EVs treatment significantly ameliorated lung IRI, with inhalation showing superior efficacy over intravenous delivery. Mechanistically, miR-22-3p within MSC-EVs targeted macrophage NLRP3, suppressing activation of the NLRP3/Caspase-1/IL-1β pathway and promoting M2 polarization. The protective efficacy was confirmed in a clinically relevant rat OLT model, underscoring their translational potential. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that inhaled MSC-derived extracellular vesicles attenuate lung ischemia–reperfusion injury by promoting macrophage polarization via the miR-22-3p/NLRP3/IL-1β pathway, supporting their potential as a cell-free therapeutic approach to mitigate primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.
1. Introduction
Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a pivotal pathological process underlying the development of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), which remains the leading cause of early morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation [1, 2]. PGD typically manifests within 72 h post-transplant as diffuse alveolar damage, severe hypoxemia, and pulmonary edema, and remains a major obstacle to improved post-transplant outcomes [3]. Mechanistically, lung IRI is initiated during the ischemic phase by metabolic derangements, which are further exacerbated upon reperfusion by a burst of oxidative stress, inflammatory mediator release, and immune cell infiltration [4]. Despite decades of investigation, no effective pharmacological agents are currently available to prevent or treat lung IRI in the transplant setting.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapies have emerged as promising candidates for mitigating IRI, owing to their potent immunomodulatory properties, capacity to promote tissue repair, and favorable safety profile observed in early-phase clinical trials [5–7]. Increasing attention has focused on MSC-derived extracellular vesicles, which are nanosized lipid bilayer vesicles enriched in proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, and which mediate much of the paracrine activity of MSCs [8, 9]. Compared with direct MSCs administration, MSC-EVs offer several advantages: they retain MSCs bioactivity without the risk of uncontrolled differentiation, display superior tissue penetration due to their small size, and exhibit low immunogenicity, rendering them particularly suitable for allogeneic applications [10–12]. Recent studies have demonstrated that MSC-EVs exert tissue-protective and reparative effects by transferring bioactive cargoes such as microRNAs (miRNAs) or mitochondria and modulating immune cell function, thereby alleviating injury and promoting regeneration [10, 13–15]. Beyond identifying the therapeutic cargoes of EVs, it is essential to elucidate the mechanisms by which they exert therapeutic benefits, including the regulation of immune responses, mitigation of oxidative stress, and promotion of tissue regeneration. However, the role and mechanisms of MSC-EVs in lung IRI remain poorly defined [16]. Clarifying these effects is crucial for the potential application of MSC-EVs in alleviating PGD after lung transplantation.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Tao Wang, Guodong Wu, Peigen Gao, Fenghui Zhuang, Zeyu Wang, Ziheng Zhou, Chongwu Li, Junqi Wu, Deping Zhao (2026). Inhalation of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Activates Macrophage Polarization through the miR-22-3p/NLRP3/IL-1β Pathway, Ameliorating Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-026-04921-w
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main finding of this study?
The study demonstrates that inhaled mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) effectively ameliorate lung ischemia-reperfusion injury by promoting macrophage polarization via the miR-22-3p/NLRP3/IL-1β pathway, offering a potential cell-free therapeutic strategy.
How does inhalation delivery compare to intravenous injection for MSC-EVs?
Inhalation delivery of MSC-EVs showed superior efficacy over intravenous injection in reducing lung ischemia-reperfusion injury in the study.
What is the mechanistic role of miR-22-3p in MSC-EVs?
miR-22-3p within MSC-EVs directly targets NLRP3 in macrophages, suppressing the NLRP3/Caspase-1/IL-1β pathway and promoting M2 polarization, which contributes to the anti-inflammatory effects.
Was the therapeutic effect of MSC-EVs validated in a clinically relevant model?
Yes, the protective efficacy of MSC-EVs was confirmed in a rat orthotopic lung transplantation model, underscoring their translational potential.
What are the implications of this study for lung transplantation?
The findings suggest that inhaled MSC-EVs could be a promising cell-free approach to mitigate primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.