Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Approximately 11.7% of total heat generated during cortical bone drilling enters the bone tissue, as determined by inverse heat transfer analysis. • The developed temperature prediction model accurately captures peak temperature, onset of temperature rise, and temperature-time curve morphology, validated against fresh porcine bone experiments. • Spatial temperature distribution shows that regions closer to the hole wall experience earlier and higher temperature peaks, with heat propagation from the surface to deeper layers. • Increasing rotational speed from 800 to 1,000 r/min enlarges the heat-affected zone from 0.71 mm to 0.86 mm, indicating higher thermal risk at higher speeds.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cortical bone drilling, cutting, friction, and heat generation can easily cause local temperature rise. If it exceeds the bone tissue tolerance threshold and continues to act, it can lead to complications such as bone necrosis, delayed healing, or prosthesis loosening. The coupling of commonly used clinical parameters such as rotational speed, feed rate, and irrigation significantly affects the degree of thermal accumulation, and there is an urgent need to establish a quantitative tool that can predict the temperature field and heat affected zone to define the safe operating window. OBJECTIVE: To establish a temperature prediction model for cortical bone in orthopedic surgery by analyzing the temperature distribution of cortical bone at different depths and radial directions. METHODS: A three-dimensional transient heat transfer control equation was established to describe the cortical bone drilling process. The moving/distributed heat source method was introduced to characterize the interface heat input caused by the shear of the anterior cutting surface and the friction of the posterior cutting surface, and the temperature field evolution at different radial and depth positions was calculated. Using the inverse heat transfer method, the distribution ratio of heat flux and heat between the tool chip bone interface was inverted under the constraint of a finite temperature sequence of measurement points. The model prediction was further validated through experimental comparison. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Inverse heat transfer inversion showed that approximately 11.7% of the total heat entered the cortical bone under given conditions; (2) The established temperature prediction model showed good consistency with fresh porcine bone drilling experiments in terms of peak temperature, onset of temperature rise, and temperature-time curve shape, confirming the reliability of the model for spatiotemporal temperature distribution; (3) In terms of spatial distribution, the closer to the hole wall (radius approaching 2.0 mm), the earlier the temperature rise and the higher the peak; along the depth direction (z=0–5 mm), temperature rise first occurred near the surface and gradually extended to deeper parts; (4) The heat affected zone increased with rotational speed: under conditions of drill diameter 4 mm and feed rate 60 mm/min, the heat affected zone was approximately 0.71 mm at 800 r/min and approximately 0.86 mm at 1,000 r/min; (5) These results indicate that under the premise of controlling drill diameter and feed rate, increasing rotational speed increases bone thermal load and heat affected zone thickness; therefore, clinically, rotational speed and cooling/irrigation strategies need to be optimized synergistically to reduce the risk of thermal bone injury; this model can be used for preoperative parameter screening and intraoperative risk assessment, providing quantitative basis for formulating a 'safe parameter window', improving tool and irrigation protocols, and enhancing patient prognosis.
1. Introduction
Cortical bone drilling is a core procedure in orthopedic surgeries such as internal fixation, joint replacement reconstruction, and osseointegrated implant placement. Its safety and precision directly affect postoperative bone healing quality and long-term implant stability [1-7]. Although orthopedic power systems are highly automated, local temperature rise caused by frictional heat during high-speed rotary cutting remains an unavoidable physical risk [8]. Extensive in vitro experiments and animal model studies have shown that if the drilling area temperature exceeds 47 °C for more than 30 seconds, it can trigger osteoblast apoptosis and collagen denaturation; if the peak temperature exceeds 56 °C and persists for several seconds, it will lead to irreversible thermal osteonecrosis, which in turn induces delayed healing, nonunion, and even early loosening of implants [9-11]. Multiple studies have confirmed that the 'temperature-time' dual-variable damage threshold is a key boundary condition for clinical safe operation [12].
However, bone tissue, as a biological composite material with low thermal conductivity (0.32 W/m·K), high anisotropy, and rich moisture content, has much lower thermal conductivity than metals or engineering plastics, making it easier to accumulate heat in semi-enclosed drilling environments [13]. If chips remain in the hole wall and are not effectively cooled in time, they not only hinder heat convection and diffusion but also cause secondary friction and aggravate local temperature rise [14]. A multicenter clinical retrospective analysis found that approximately 19% of early failures after primary total hip arthroplasty were mainly induced by intraoperative drilling thermal injury [15]. Therefore, establishing a predictable and controllable drilling thermal response model has become an urgent need to improve surgical safety and postoperative reliability [16].
Currently, research methods for bone drilling thermal behavior are mainly divided into three categories: experimental temperature measurement, numerical simulation, and hybrid inverse inference. At the experimental level, micro thermocouple arrays, infrared thermal imaging cameras, and fiber Bragg grating sensors are widely used to record transient temperature field distributions under different drilling speeds (500–3,000 r/min), feed rates (20–150 mm/min), drill bit configurations (stepped, hollow, coated), and cooling strategies (external irrigation, internal cooling channels, intermittent drilling) [17-21]. For example, ZHANG et al. [22] used a radial four-point embedded thermocouple method to confirm that in the cortical bone of porcine femur, when the rotational speed increased from 1,000 r/min to 2,500 r/min, the peak temperature at 1 mm from the hole wall increased sharply from 42.1 °C to 68.7 °C, and the depth of the heat-affected zone expanded by 47% simultaneously. LEE et al. [23] used a high-speed infrared camera to capture that under no irrigation conditions, the temperature at the bottom center of the hole could reach (72.3±3.1) °C after 60 seconds of continuous drilling, significantly exceeding the physiological tolerance limit.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
HU Zanying, GAO Fei (2026). Construction and validation of a temperature prediction model for cortical bone during orthopedic surgery. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21650
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main objective of the study?
The main objective is to establish a temperature prediction model for cortical bone during orthopedic surgery by analyzing temperature distribution at different depths and radial directions, aiming to define safe operating windows and reduce thermal injury risk.
How was the temperature prediction model developed?
The model was developed using a three-dimensional transient heat transfer control equation with moving/distributed heat source method to characterize interface heat input, and inverse heat transfer method to determine heat flux distribution and energy partition between tool, chip, and bone.
What were the key findings regarding heat distribution?
Approximately 11.7% of total heat enters the cortical bone under given conditions. The model accurately predicted temperature-time curves and spatial distribution, with higher temperatures near the hole wall and propagation from surface to deeper layers.
How does rotational speed affect the heat-affected zone?
Increasing rotational speed from 800 to 1,000 r/min (with drill diameter 4 mm and feed rate 60 mm/min) enlarges the heat-affected zone from 0.71 mm to 0.86 mm, indicating higher thermal risk at higher speeds.
What are the clinical implications of this model?
The model can be used for preoperative parameter screening and intraoperative risk assessment, helping to optimize rotational speed and cooling/irrigation strategies to minimize thermal bone injury and improve patient outcomes.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.