🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21351Original Research

Action mechanism of mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives in the treatment of liver fibrosis

Fan Longyu¹,Yuan Xiao¹,Xie Yanan¹,Yin Xiaoxuan¹

Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong Province, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Action mechanism of mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives in the treatment of liver fibrosis
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1901, Issue 29 • pp. 100-112Citation:Fan Longyu et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • MSCs and their derivatives reduce hepatocyte death, including apoptosis, necrosis, and ferroptosis, thereby preserving liver function. • MSCs can differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells, contributing to liver regeneration and replacement of damaged hepatocytes. • MSCs exert immunomodulatory effects by regulating macrophage polarization and T cell responses, shifting the liver microenvironment from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory. • MSCs and their secretome inhibit hepatic stellate cell activation, reducing extracellular matrix deposition and thus halting fibrosis progression.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple chronic liver diseases that fail to heal will progress to the stage of liver fibrosis. If not treated in a timely manner, they will eventually develop into liver cancer, severely threatening the safety of patients' lives. However, there is currently no specific drug for the treatment of liver fibrosis. Recent studies have demonstrated that mesenchymal stem cell therapy has significant advantages over traditional treatment protocols, providing a new direction for the treatment of liver fibrosis. OBJECTIVE: To review the mechanisms of action of mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives in the treatment of liver fibrosis. METHODS: The Chinese and English keywords "mesenchymal stem cells, mesenchymal stromal cells, MSCs, liver fibrosis, hepatic fibrosis, hepatocyte death, liver cell death, hepatocyte-like cells, immunomodulation, macrophage, hepatic stellate cells, clinical trials, clinical studies" were used and searched in CNKI and PubMed databases, a total of 81 eligible articles were selected for this review. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Through summarizing existing studies, the mechanisms by which mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives exert anti-fibrotic effects and delay disease progression have been identified. These specific mechanisms include reducing hepatocyte death, differentiating into hepatocyte-like cells, regulating immune responses, and inhibiting hepatic stellate cell activation, confirming that mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives can serve as a new direction for the treatment of liver fibrosis-related diseases.

1. Introduction

Liver fibrosis is a reversible excessive repair response of the liver to chronic injury, driven by a triad of pathological processes: hepatocyte damage, inflammatory response, and aberrant repair. Various chronic etiologies (such as drug injury, hepatitis viruses, alcohol) can induce necrosis and apoptosis of hepatic parenchymal cells, triggering hepatic inflammation. Subsequently, injured hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, sinusoidal endothelial cells, and lymphocytes release multiple mediators that stimulate quiescent hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in the space of Disse, converting them into myofibroblasts that produce large amounts of extracellular matrix, leading to fibrous septa and sinusoidal capillarization, resulting in liver fibrosis [1-2]. If fibrosis progresses, it irreversibly alters liver architecture (forming pseudolobules) and function, ultimately advancing to decompensated cirrhosis, complicated by portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure, severely threatening patient lives. Current therapeutic strategies focus on etiological control combined with anti-fibrotic agents, but most drugs are still in clinical trials, and no drug has been approved specifically for liver fibrosis [2-3].

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are adult stem cells with self-renewal capacity and multilineage differentiation potential, morphologically resembling fibroblasts, and can be isolated from various tissues such as bone marrow, umbilical cord, and adipose tissue. Studies have shown that MSCs can differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells under in vitro culture conditions, providing a theoretical basis for MSC transplantation to replenish functional hepatocytes in damaged livers. Crucially, the potent secretory function of MSCs has been confirmed as a core mechanism of their therapeutic effects; they secrete bioactive molecules and extracellular vesicles that exhibit multiple effects in liver fibrosis models, including immunomodulation, promotion of tissue repair, and inhibition of HSC activation. This multi-target intervention property makes MSCs a highly promising new strategy for liver fibrosis treatment [4]. Based on this, this article reviews the mechanisms of action and clinical application status of MSCs in the treatment of liver fibrosis in recent years, laying a foundation for further research.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Fan Longyu, Yuan Xiao, Xie Yanan, Yin Xiaoxuan (2026). Action mechanism of mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives in the treatment of liver fibrosis. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21351
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main mechanisms by which mesenchymal stem cells treat liver fibrosis?

MSCs and their derivatives combat liver fibrosis through multiple mechanisms: reducing hepatocyte death (apoptosis, necrosis, ferroptosis), differentiating into hepatocyte-like cells to replace damaged hepatocytes, modulating immune responses (e.g., macrophage polarization, T cell regulation), and inhibiting hepatic stellate cell activation, thereby reducing extracellular matrix deposition.

Can mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into hepatocytes?

Yes, under appropriate in vitro culture conditions, MSCs can differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells expressing liver-specific markers and functions. This differentiation potential supports their use in cell replacement therapy for liver fibrosis.

What is the role of extracellular vesicles in MSC-based therapy for liver fibrosis?

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by MSCs carry bioactive molecules such as proteins, lipids, and microRNAs. They mediate paracrine effects, including immunomodulation, anti-inflammatory responses, and inhibition of hepatic stellate cell activation, contributing to the anti-fibrotic effects of MSCs.

Are there any clinical trials using MSCs for liver fibrosis?

Yes, several clinical trials have been conducted or are ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MSC transplantation in patients with liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. While results are promising, larger randomized controlled trials are needed to establish standardized protocols.

What are the advantages of MSC therapy over traditional treatments for liver fibrosis?

MSC therapy offers a multi-target approach, addressing not only fibrosis but also inflammation and hepatocyte regeneration. It has shown potential to reverse fibrosis, whereas traditional treatments mainly focus on etiological control and may not reverse established fibrosis. Additionally, MSCs have immunomodulatory properties that can reduce side effects.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF