Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Higher dietary magnesium intake is significantly associated with reduced cardiovascular disease mortality in osteoarthritis patients, with a 78% risk reduction per unit increase. • Dietary magnesium intake exhibits a U-shaped association with all-cause and cancer mortality, with optimal intake thresholds at 0.38 g/d and 0.40 g/d, respectively. • Both low and high magnesium intake increase mortality risk, emphasizing the importance of maintaining adequate but not excessive magnesium levels. • Subgroup analyses confirm the robustness of these findings, supporting the role of magnesium in nutritional management for osteoarthritis patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clarifying the relationship between dietary magnesium intake and mortality risk in patients with osteoarthritis can provide theoretical basis for optimizing dietary interventions, reducing all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease mortality, and provide reference value for nutritional management in patients with osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between dietary magnesium intake and all-cause and etiological mortality in adults with osteoarthritis in the United States. METHODS: We enrolled data of adults with osteoarthritis from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics under the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it aims to assess the health and nutritional status of the civilian population in the United States) between 2003 and 2020. The association between dietary magnesium intake and mortality in patients with osteoarthritis was evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model and two-stage Cox model. To assess whether the association between dietary magnesium intake and all-cause mortality was consistent across the population and to identify potential high-risk groups, subgroup analyses in terms of age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, physical activity, smoking status, and drinking status were performed and tested for interactions. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) A total of 2 868 patients with osteoarthritis were included, and 699 all-cause deaths, 281 cardiovascular disease deaths, and 143 cancer deaths were recorded during follow-up. After adjusting for multiple variables, higher dietary magnesium intake was significantly associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease mortality; each 1-unit increase in dietary magnesium intake was associated with a 78% reduction in cardiovascular disease mortality (P=0.022 2), and quartile analysis of dietary magnesium intake was consistent with this. Dietary magnesium intake showed a U-shaped association with all-cause mortality and cancer mortality, with thresholds for lowest mortality risk at 0.38 g/d and 0.40 g/d, respectively. When magnesium intake was below the threshold, higher intake was significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality [HR=0.17, 95%CI(0.06, 0.50)] and cancer mortality [HR=0.16, 95%CI(0.01, 1.50)]; but above the threshold, magnesium intake was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality [HR=2.94, 95%CI(0.55, 15.84)] and cancer mortality [HR=26.30, 95%CI(1.46, 474.73)]. Subgroup analyses further verified the robustness of the results. (2) The results indicate that insufficient dietary magnesium intake may play an adverse role in cardiovascular health, and there is a U-shaped relationship between dietary magnesium intake and all-cause mortality and cancer mortality, with both too low and too high magnesium intake potentially increasing mortality risk. This finding provides new insights into the potential impact of dietary magnesium intake on cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality, provides scientific basis for nutritional intervention in patients with osteoarthritis, and provides theoretical support for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease and cancer in China, especially in the context of high cardiovascular disease incidence, reasonable magnesium intake helps reduce related mortality.
1. Introduction
Osteoarthritis is a chronic orthopedic disease primarily caused by cartilage degeneration [1], often leading to pain during walking, limited mobility, and ultimately disability [2]. With the aging of the global population, the incidence of osteoarthritis has been increasing annually, making it an increasingly severe public health issue [3]. Meta-analyses and cohort studies have shown that patients with osteoarthritis have a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality compared to the general population [4-5]. Therefore, identifying biomarkers that can predict and reduce long-term mortality risk, especially cardiovascular-related deaths, is of great importance. Existing research indicates that genetic factors, obesity, and unhealthy dietary habits may increase the risk of developing osteoarthritis [3].
Magnesium, as a key trace element in the human body, participates in metabolic balance and energy regulation, and an increasing number of studies point to a close relationship between dietary magnesium and osteoarthritis [6]. VERONESE et al. [7] found that for every 100 mg increase in daily magnesium intake, knee cartilage thickness and volume significantly increased, suggesting that high magnesium intake may play a positive role in the prevention and treatment of osteoarthritis. However, KONSTARI et al. [8] reported results contrary to this hypothesis, failing to demonstrate a protective effect of high magnesium intake on knee osteoarthritis. A meta-analysis showed that increased daily magnesium intake was significantly associated with reduced fracture risk in patients with knee osteoarthritis, but this increase did not significantly reduce the risk of knee osteoarthritis itself; moreover, individuals with higher serum magnesium levels had a significantly lower risk of knee osteoarthritis [9]. BAI et al. [10] ...
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Zhou Haidong, Lu Yaohong, Fan Shaoyong (2026). U-shaped association between magnesium intake and all-cause and cancer mortality in patients with osteoarthritis. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21213
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the relationship between dietary magnesium intake and mortality in osteoarthritis patients?
The study found a U-shaped association between dietary magnesium intake and all-cause and cancer mortality, with lowest risk at 0.38 g/d and 0.40 g/d, respectively. Additionally, higher magnesium intake was linearly associated with reduced cardiovascular disease mortality.
What are the optimal dietary magnesium intake levels for osteoarthritis patients?
The optimal intake levels for reducing all-cause and cancer mortality were identified as 0.38 g/d and 0.40 g/d, respectively. However, for cardiovascular disease mortality, higher intake was consistently beneficial.
How was the study conducted?
The study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2003 to 2020, including 2,868 adults with osteoarthritis. Cox proportional hazard models and two-stage Cox models were employed to assess associations, with subgroup analyses for robustness.
What are the clinical implications of this study?
The findings suggest that maintaining adequate but not excessive magnesium intake may help reduce mortality risk in osteoarthritis patients, providing a basis for dietary interventions and nutritional management.
Are there any limitations to this study?
The study is observational and relies on self-reported dietary intake, which may introduce measurement errors. Residual confounding cannot be excluded, and the generalizability to non-US populations may be limited.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.