Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Transcription factor EB (TFEB) is a master regulator of the autophagy-lysosome pathway, and its activation enhances clearance of amyloid-β and Tau, mitigating neurotoxicity in Alzheimer’s disease. • Dysfunction of the autophagy-lysosome pathway contributes to the accumulation of neurotoxic protein aggregates, a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. • Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies that activate TFEB show promise in reducing amyloid-β deposition and Tau phosphorylation, improving cognitive outcomes in preclinical models. • Challenges remain, including potential risks of sustained TFEB activation (e.g., lysosomal storage disorders) and the need for targeted delivery systems to the brain for effective translation.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies have confirmed that transcription factor EB and its dependent autophagy-lysosome pathway play a role in the development of various neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the role of transcription factor EB-mediated autophagy-lysosome pathway in Alzheimer’s disease. METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Medical Network, and VIP were searched. The search period was from database inception to January 2025. The search terms were “Alzheimer Disease, AD, Transcription Factor EB, TFEB, Autophagy-lysosome Pathway, Autophagy, Lysosomes, Amyloid beta, Aβ, Tau, Tau protein” in English as well as “Alzheimer’s disease, transcription factor EB, autophagic lysosomes, autophagy, lysosomes, β-amyloid, Tau” in Chinese. Additionally, the references of relevant reviews and grey literature were manually supplemented. A total of 100 articles were finally included for review. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Amyloid-β deposition and Tau protein phosphorylation are the key pathological features of Alzheimer’s disease. Abnormalities in the autophagy-lysosome pathway promote the formation of neurotoxic protein aggregates such as amyloid-β and Tau, leading to the clinical manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease characterized by cognitive dysfunction and behavioral abnormalities. Transcription factor EB is a key regulator of the autophagy-lysosome pathway, controlling the transcription of many autophagy-related genes and lysosomal biogenesis. After entering the nucleus, transcription factor EB upregulates the expression of autophagy-lysosome pathway-related genes, significantly increasing the clearance rate of amyloid-β and Tau and significantly reducing neuronal toxicity. Therefore, increasing attention focuses on targeting transcription factor EB to influence autophagy-lysosome biological activity, thereby improving Alzheimer’s disease pathology and behavioral deficits. For example, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions can activate transcription factor EB, reducing amyloid-β deposition and Tau phosphorylation, and improving cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease. However, sustained activation of transcription factor EB may pose risks such as lysosomal storage disorders, and current intracranial delivery systems have insufficient targeting efficiency. Future development of pathological microenvironment-responsive carriers and combination therapies is needed to achieve precise intervention.
1. Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an age-related neurodegenerative disorder clinically characterized by progressive cognitive decline, psychiatric symptoms, and impaired social functioning. Despite the rising prevalence, the precise pathophysiological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. However, multiple studies have established that the brain pathology of AD involves diffuse cerebral atrophy, with microscopic hallmarks including extracellular deposition of β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques, intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles composed of hyperphosphorylated Tau protein, and neuronal loss in specific brain regions [1].
The autophagy-lysosome pathway (ALP) serves as the cell’s “cleanup crew,” maintaining cellular homeostasis by degrading aggregated proteins, damaged organelles, and invading pathogens. This pathway is complex and regulated by multiple signaling cascades under various stress conditions, among which transcription factor EB (TFEB) plays a pivotal role. Numerous studies have confirmed that TFEB and its dependent ALP are involved in the pathogenesis of various neurodegenerative diseases, including AD. This review aims to summarize the role of TFEB-mediated ALP in AD, focusing on its regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic potential.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Hu Yalin, Huang Fengqin, Yang Boyin, Luo Xingmei (2026). Transcription factor EB improves Alzheimer’s disease via the autophagy-lysosome pathway. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21248
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the role of transcription factor EB in Alzheimer's disease?
Transcription factor EB (TFEB) is a master regulator of the autophagy-lysosome pathway. In Alzheimer's disease, TFEB activation enhances the clearance of amyloid-beta and Tau proteins, reducing neurotoxicity and improving cognitive function.
How does the autophagy-lysosome pathway contribute to Alzheimer's disease?
Dysfunction of the autophagy-lysosome pathway leads to the accumulation of neurotoxic protein aggregates such as amyloid-beta and Tau, which are key pathological features of Alzheimer's disease. Impaired clearance exacerbates neurodegeneration.
What are potential therapeutic strategies targeting TFEB for Alzheimer's disease?
Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions can activate TFEB, promoting autophagy and lysosomal biogenesis to clear toxic proteins. Examples include small molecules, gene therapy, and lifestyle modifications like exercise and dietary restriction.
What are the challenges in targeting TFEB for Alzheimer's therapy?
Challenges include potential risks of sustained TFEB activation, such as lysosomal storage disorders, and the difficulty of delivering therapeutic agents across the blood-brain barrier. Future research aims to develop targeted delivery systems and combination therapies.
What is the significance of TFEB in the context of Alzheimer's disease pathology?
TFEB is a key regulator of the autophagy-lysosome pathway, which is crucial for clearing protein aggregates. In Alzheimer's disease, TFEB activity is often impaired, contributing to the accumulation of amyloid-beta and Tau. Enhancing TFEB function represents a promising therapeutic approach.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.