🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.3724/abbs.2024034Original Research

The recent advancement of TCR-T cell therapies for cancer treatment

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: The recent advancement of TCR-T cell therapies for cancer treatment

Xiang Zhao¹,Shuai Shao¹,Lanxin Hu¹

Key Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
The recent advancement of TCR-T cell therapies for cancer treatment
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Published:2024Edition:Vol. 56, Issue 5 • pp. 663-674Citation:Xiang Zhao et al. (2024), Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica (生物化学与生物物理学报).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • TCR-T cell therapy can target the entire proteome of cancer cells, offering a broader range of targets compared to CAR-T therapy, which is limited to surface antigens. • Recent advancements in TCR-T cell therapy include the discovery of novel tumor antigens, innovative protein engineering techniques, and reprogramming strategies that enhance T-cell function and persistence. • Clinical trials have demonstrated success of TCR-T cell therapy in treating solid tumors, a significant achievement given the limited efficacy of CAR-T therapy in such cancers. • The review highlights the progress of TCR-T cell therapy in China and proposes future directions, including optimizing TCR affinity and overcoming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapies involve infusing engineered immune cells into cancer patients to recognize and eliminate tumor cells. Adoptive cell therapy, as a form of living drug, has undergone explosive growth over the past decade. The recognition of tumor antigens by the T-cell receptor (TCR) is one of the natural mechanisms that the immune system used to eliminate tumor cells. TCR-T cell therapy, which involves introducing exogenous TCRs into patients’ T cells, is a novel cell therapy strategy. TCR-T cell therapy can target the entire proteome of cancer cells. Engineering T cells with exogenous TCRs to help patients combat cancer has achieved success in clinical trials, particularly in treating solid tumors. In this review, we examine the progress of TCR-T cell therapy over the past five years. This includes the discovery of new tumor antigens, protein engineering techniques for TCR, reprogramming strategies for TCR-T cell therapy, clinical studies on TCR-T cell therapy, and the advancement of TCR-T cell therapy in China. We also propose several potential directions for the future development of TCR-T cell therapy.

1. Introduction

The immune system is the body’s natural defense system that recognizes and kills tumor cells [1]. Although the immune system may fail to eliminate tumor cells due to the exhaustion of immune cells [2], a suppressive tumor microenvironment [3,4], and multiple tumor escape strategies [5,6], we can enhance the immune system through protein engineering or cell engineering to combat cancer. In the last two decades, we have witnessed a boom in basic immunology, particularly in the understanding of the checkpoint mechanism of T-cell activation and the design of chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). Meanwhile, mechanisms related to tumor immunology, therapeutic targets, and molecular design have been successfully translated into approved immunotherapy, saving many cancer patients. The discovery of the immune checkpoint mechanism and the development of T-cell engineering have made immunotherapy one of the key pillars in the contemporary treatment of cancer [7–10].

Immunotherapy can take many forms, but the majority of clinical success comes from antibody blockade treatment and adoptive cell transfer therapy (ACT). Antibody blockade treatment includes immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), such as anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 treatments [9,11–14]. Over six anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 drugs have been approved by the FDA [15]. For adoptive cell therapy, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has achieved significant success, including the complete cure of leukemia patients [16]. CAR-T therapy involves transducing T cells with artificial receptors that can recognize surface antigens on tumor cells and deliver activation signals to the T cells. More than six CAR-T therapies have been approved for B-cell lymphoma, but no CAR-T therapy has been approved for solid tumors [17]. Both checkpoint blockade and CAR-T cell therapy have cured many, but not all, cancer patients [18,19]. As of now, there are no approved adoptive cell therapies (including CAR-T, CAR-NK, etc.) for solid tumors [20–22].

T cells play important roles in killing tumors. The immune system naturally uses T cell receptors (TCRs) to recognize tumor antigens and eradicate tumor cells. The TCR molecule has evolved over 450 million years as an elegant system to balance antigen recognition, cross-reactivity, and sensitive signaling [23–26]. It is not surprising that people have been considering using TCR to enhance the immune system for over 30 years [27,28]. One idea is to isolate a potent TCR that can effectively eliminate tumor cells and then administer the TCR to patients by modifying their autologous T cells. TCR-T cell therapy is the name of the treatment. Rosenberg and his colleagues were pioneers in the first clinical trial of TCR-T cell therapy for the treatment of melanoma. They observed a positive response in two patients [29]. Based on TCR research, in the 2010s, significant success has been achieved in the development of TCR-T cell therapy for solid tumors [21].

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Xiang Zhao, Shuai Shao, Lanxin Hu (2026). The recent advancement of TCR-T cell therapies for cancer treatment. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2024034
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is TCR-T cell therapy?

TCR-T cell therapy is a form of adoptive cell therapy that involves engineering a patient's own T cells to express a T-cell receptor (TCR) specific to tumor antigens. This allows the T cells to recognize and kill cancer cells, potentially targeting a wide range of intracellular and surface antigens.

How does TCR-T cell therapy differ from CAR-T cell therapy?

While CAR-T therapy uses chimeric antigen receptors that recognize surface antigens, TCR-T therapy uses natural T-cell receptors that can recognize peptide antigens presented on MHC molecules, thus enabling targeting of the entire proteome, including intracellular proteins. This makes TCR-T potentially more effective for solid tumors.

What are the recent advancements in TCR-T cell therapy?

Recent advancements include the discovery of novel tumor antigens, improved protein engineering techniques for TCR affinity and specificity, reprogramming strategies to enhance T-cell function and persistence, and promising clinical trials, especially for solid tumors. Additionally, progress is being made in China.

What are the main challenges facing TCR-T cell therapy?

Challenges include identifying safe and effective tumor-specific antigens, overcoming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, reducing off-target toxicity, and improving T-cell persistence and function. Additionally, manufacturing and cost issues remain.

What is the future outlook for TCR-T cell therapy?

The future of TCR-T cell therapy looks promising, with potential approval for solid tumors. Future directions include optimizing TCR engineering, combining with checkpoint inhibitors, developing allogeneic approaches, and expanding to a broader range of cancer types.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF