🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.3724/abbs.2025099Original Research

The dual role of RNA-binding proteins: promotion of tumorigenesis, drug resistance, and emerging therapeutic targets

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: The dual role of RNA-binding proteins: promotion of tumorigenesis, drug resistance, and emerging therapeutic targets

Zemei Xu¹,Yukun Cui¹

Sun Yat-sen University

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
The dual role of RNA-binding proteins: promotion of tumorigenesis, drug resistance, and emerging therapeutic targets
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Published:2025Edition:Vol. 57, Issue 12 • pp. 1923-1938Citation:Zemei Xu et al. (2025), Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica (生物化学与生物物理学报).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • RBPs regulate tumorigenesis and chemoresistance through diverse RNA processes, including splicing, translation, and m6A modification. • Six canonical RNA-binding domains (RRM, KH, etc.) are structurally characterized, with multiple domains enhancing binding specificity. • Dysregulation of RBPs is common in cancers, offering prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets. • Emerging computational tools for predicting RBP-RNA interactions facilitate the discovery of novel drug targets.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Cancer is a complex and multifaceted disease characterized by a multitude of molecular factors. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have emerged as pivotal regulators of tumor development, progression, and chemoresistance through their interactions with target transcripts. These interactions regulate a multitude of processes, including alternative splicing, cleavage and polyadenylation, RNA localization, translation, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification, and DNA double-strand break repair. The RBP family comprises over 2000 proteins and plays a critical role in oncogene expression, invasion, metastasis, and inhibition of apoptosis. However, the mechanisms by which RBPs selectively recognize RNAs remain an active area of research. In this review, we examine recent advancements in understanding RNA-binding domains and the RNA processes regulated by RBPs in tumorigenesis, summarize and highlight the roles of RNA-binding domains in cancers and the molecular mechanisms of RBPs in chemotherapy resistance, discuss the potential of targeting RBPs for cancer therapy and review RBPs that are dysregulated in cancers. Additionally, we highlight recently developed tools for predicting RBP-RNA binding activities to provide valuable support for ongoing research efforts.

1. Introduction

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play crucial roles in the tumorigenesis and progression of cancers by regulating mRNA metabolism. Additionally, certain RBPs are involved in RNA modifications, specifically N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications, exemplified by IGF2BPs. Furthermore, they modulate the expression and activity of m6A readers such as Musashi 1 (MSI1) [1]. RBP-RNA binding occurs at coding sequences, 5′ untranslated regions (5′UTRs), and 3′ untranslated regions (3′UTRs). This interaction is mediated by specific RNA-binding domains (RBDs) that recognize and bind to particular RNA motifs [2]. RBDs have been the subject of research for several decades. However, the specific mechanisms by which RBDs recognize RNA motifs remain an active area of investigation. Previous studies have demonstrated that van der Waals interactions and hydrogen bonds play crucial roles in this recognition process [3]. A variety of techniques, including molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and crystallography, have been employed to elucidate the mechanisms by which RBDs recognize their target RNAs.

The majority of RBPs are upregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with normal tissues. RBPs play pivotal roles in the regulation of posttranscriptional gene expression, and dysregulation of RBP-RNA interactions can have detrimental effects on cancer progression [4,5]. Therefore, an increasing number of studies have investigated the relationship between RBPs and cancer.

In this review, we provide an overview of the structural and functional characteristics of six well-characterized RBDs involved in RNA recognition, and summarize the roles of RBPs in oncology, aiming to elaborate on the mechanisms through which RBPs contribute to tumorigenesis and chemotherapy resistance in diverse cancers. Additionally, we provide insights into their prognostic significance and clinical therapeutic potential.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Zemei Xu, Yukun Cui (2026). The dual role of RNA-binding proteins: promotion of tumorigenesis, drug resistance, and emerging therapeutic targets. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2025099
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and why are they important in cancer?

RBPs are a large family of proteins that regulate RNA metabolism, including splicing, translation, and stability. In cancer, they can promote tumorigenesis and drug resistance by controlling the expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressors.

What are the main RNA-binding domains discussed in this review?

The review focuses on six well-characterized RNA-binding domains: RNA recognition motifs (RRMs), K homology (KH) domains, and others, which are critical for specific RNA recognition.

How do RBPs contribute to chemotherapy resistance?

RBPs can modulate the expression of genes involved in drug metabolism, DNA repair, and apoptosis, thereby enabling cancer cells to survive chemotherapy.

Can RBPs be targeted for cancer therapy?

Yes, RBPs are emerging as potential therapeutic targets. Inhibiting their function or expression could disrupt oncogenic pathways, and several strategies are being explored.

What computational tools are available for predicting RBP-RNA interactions?

Recent tools use machine learning and structural data to predict RBP binding sites on RNA, aiding in the identification of novel targets and understanding of RBP function.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF