🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21252Original Research

Systematic druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies therapeutic targets for major depressive disorder

Zhou Menghan¹,Liu Shuning¹,Jiang Tao¹,Sun Zhuangzhuang¹,Cao Lingling¹,Su Xin¹,Yu Cheng¹,Guo Junpeng¹

Changchun University of Chinese Medicine

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Systematic druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies therapeutic targets for major depressive disorder
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1896, Issue 24 • pp. 100-112Citation:Zhou Menghan et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Identified 21 druggable genes with causal evidence for major depressive disorder via Mendelian randomization. • BTN3A3, CISD1, and PSMB4 showed strong colocalization signals, suggesting shared causal variants. • Gemcitabine, fucose, and isococculidine emerged as potential repurposable drugs, with isococculidine showing the most stable binding to BTN3A3. • Integration of genomics and structural biology provides a framework for prioritizing therapeutic targets in depression.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of major depressive disorder is typically associated with genetic and environmental factors. Currently, the diagnosis of major depressive disorder mainly relies on clinical interviews and symptom assessments, lacking clear and reproducible biological markers. This can lead to misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses, delaying the timing of treatment. OBJECTIVE: To identify druggable genes that may act as potential therapeutic targets for major depressive disorder by conducting comprehensive genome-wide Mendelian randomization analysis. METHODS: By integrating expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) data and protein quantitative trait locus (pQTL) data from pharmacologically actionable genes with genome-wide association study (GWAS) data on major depressive disorder (including 177 377 cases and 445 321 controls), Mendelian randomization analysis was conducted to identify druggable genes that have a causal relationship with major depressive disorder. Additionally, enrichment analysis, protein-protein interaction network construction, drug target identification, and molecular docking simulations were performed to further explore potential therapeutic strategies. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 4 394 druggable genes were analyzed, and 21 druggable genes considerably associated with major depressive disorder were identified. Bayesian colocalization analysis indicated that BTN3A3, CISD1, and PSMB4 had posterior probabilities of hypothesis 4 (H4.abf) > 0.5, supporting the possibility of shared causal variants. GO enrichment analysis mainly involved 'antigen processing and presentation', 'protein degradation and processing', 'mitochondrial outer membrane', and 'immune receptor activity' pathways related to major depression. Protein-protein interaction network analysis showed moderate connectivity among the identified genes (21 nodes, 14 edges). Drug target identification determined gemcitabine (CID 60750), fucose (CID 17106), and isococculidine (CID 2826) as main candidate compounds, which had strong associations with several key genes. Molecular docking analysis revealed stable drug-protein interactions, with isococculidine showing the most stable binding energy (-52.74 kJ/mol) with BTN3A3. In conclusion, Mendelian randomization combined with genomics and structural biology analysis provides valuable decision-making basis for target prioritization and drug repurposing, offering new ideas and directions for efficient utilization of basic research resources and drug development for major depressive disorder.

1. Introduction

Major depressive disorder is a complex neuropsychiatric disease characterized by persistent low mood, loss of interest or pleasure, and recurrent suicidal ideation, often accompanied by significant emotional, cognitive, and physical dysfunction [1]. These symptoms not only severely affect patients' quality of life but may also exacerbate other diseases and social adaptation difficulties, further expanding the overall burden of the disease [2]. Currently, major depressive disorder has been listed as one of the most disabling diseases globally, with its prevalence continuously rising, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, when the global number of depression patients rapidly increased to approximately 246 million [3].

The occurrence of major depression is usually associated with genetic and environmental factors [4]. At present, the diagnosis of major depressive disorder still mainly relies on clinical interviews and symptom assessments, lacking clear and reproducible biological markers, which can easily lead to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis, delaying treatment opportunities [5]. Major depressive disorder has become a global public health challenge due to its high prevalence, high disability, and high recurrence rate, imposing a heavy burden on social and economic systems [6]. The pathophysiological mechanism of major depressive disorder is extremely complex, and the etiological mechanism has not been fully elucidated to date. Studies have shown that the occurrence of major depression may involve multiple intersecting pathways, including neuroinflammation, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction, and neuroplasticity impairment [7-9].

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Zhou Menghan, Liu Shuning, Jiang Tao, Sun Zhuangzhuang, Cao Lingling, Su Xin, Yu Cheng, Guo Junpeng (2026). Systematic druggable genome-wide Mendelian randomization identifies therapeutic targets for major depressive disorder. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21252
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main objective of this study?

The main objective is to identify druggable genes that may serve as potential therapeutic targets for major depressive disorder using comprehensive genome-wide Mendelian randomization analysis.

How many druggable genes were analyzed and how many were significantly associated with major depressive disorder?

A total of 4,394 druggable genes were analyzed, and 21 were identified as significantly associated with major depressive disorder.

Which genes showed strong evidence of shared causal variants with major depressive disorder?

BTN3A3, CISD1, and PSMB4 showed strong evidence of shared causal variants, as indicated by Bayesian colocalization analysis with H4.abf > 0.5.

What potential drugs were identified for repurposing in major depressive disorder?

Gemcitabine, fucose, and isococculidine were identified as potential candidate drugs, with isococculidine showing the most stable binding energy (-52.74 kJ/mol) with BTN3A3.

What methods were used beyond Mendelian randomization?

Additional methods included enrichment analysis, protein-protein interaction network construction, drug target identification, and molecular docking simulations.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF