Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Identified BMI and baseline IGF-1 as significant clinical predictors of ΔIGF-1 after 4 weeks of r-hGH therapy in GHD children. • Discovered 38 SNPs in 18 genes significantly associated with ΔIGF-1, with 4 SNPs in HSD3B1 and INSR showing strong correlation (P<0.01). • Applied elastic net algorithm to integrate clinical and genetic factors, enhancing prediction accuracy of treatment response. • Findings support personalized r-hGH dosing strategies to optimize growth outcomes in GHD children.
Abstract
Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is the most common pituitary hormone deficiency and is clinically characterized by short stature, delayed bone age and central distribution of body fat, and it has also been proven to be mildly heritable. Treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) is primary and safe for GHD children, and a dose of 0.15‒0.20 mg/kg each week results in a considerable increase in height velocity, with noteworthy growth during the first year of therapy [1]. Previous studies have shown that serum IGF-1 is strongly correlated with the growth response [2]. Therefore, IGF-1 can serve as a clinical indicator for monitoring compliance, efficacy and safety. However, the response to GH therapy shows significant individual variation, which is strongly associated with genetic factors. The prevalence rate of severe childhood GHD-related short stature varies from 1:4000 to 1:10,000 [3], while approximately 3%‒4% of the population in China suffers from short stature with an increasing trend. Therefore, an open-label, prospective, multicentric, noncomparative, nonrandomized phase IV interventional study (NCT01187550, Merck Serono Study 27709) was conducted to investigate the relationship between the prospective biomarkers of GHD patients and the individual variation in the primary therapeutic response following 4 weeks of r-hGH therapy. Given the significance of predicting GHD treatment response and the gaps in previous research, we sought to adopt a comprehensive strategy to accurately predict the therapeutic response utilizing the transcriptome, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and clinical factors. We employed continuous variables and standard deviation scores of differences in serum IGF-1 levels after 4 weeks of r-hGH therapy (ΔIGF-1) as targets to filter possible influencing variables. Furthermore, we compared several potential machine learning techniques, validated by PCA and PLS-DA, and ultimately applied the elastic net algorithm to determine the optimized predictive factors with consistent effect sizes. Additionally, expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis and differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis were conducted to identify significant biomarkers for GHD treatment.
1. Introduction
Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is the most common pituitary hormone deficiency, characterized by short stature, delayed bone age, and central fat distribution, with a mild heritable component. Recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) therapy is the primary and safe treatment, typically administered at 0.15–0.20 mg/kg per week, leading to significant catch-up growth, especially in the first year. Serum IGF-1 levels strongly correlate with growth response, making it a valuable clinical biomarker for monitoring efficacy and safety. However, individual responses vary considerably, influenced by genetic factors. The prevalence of severe childhood GHD-related short stature ranges from 1:4000 to 1:10,000, with 3–4% of the Chinese population affected by short stature, a trend that is increasing.
To address the need for personalized treatment, an open-label, prospective, multicentric phase IV study (NCT01187550) was conducted to identify biomarkers predicting the therapeutic response after 4 weeks of r-hGH therapy. This study employed a comprehensive approach integrating transcriptomic data, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and clinical factors. Using machine learning techniques, including elastic net, and validated by PCA and PLS-DA, we aimed to identify optimized predictive factors. Additionally, eQTL and differential gene expression analyses were performed to uncover significant biomarkers for GHD treatment response.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Fei Liu, NokI Lei, Wunying Li, Yiwen Zheng, Liangjian Hu, Ronggui Hu, Wenli Lu, Yu S. Huang (2026). Significant biomarkers for predicting 1-month changes in IGF-1 in growth hormone-deficient children following r-hGH therapy. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2024089
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main objective of this study?
The study aims to identify significant biomarkers that can predict the 1-month changes in IGF-1 levels in growth hormone-deficient children following recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) therapy, using a combination of clinical factors, SNPs, and machine learning approaches.
Which clinical factors were found to be significant predictors of treatment response?
BMI and baseline IGF-1 were identified as significant clinical predictors of ΔIGF-1 after 4 weeks of r-hGH therapy, based on multivariate linear regression analysis.
How many SNPs were significantly associated with ΔIGF-1?
A total of 38 SNPs corresponding to 18 genes were significantly correlated with ΔIGF-1 (P<0.05), with 4 SNPs in HSD3B1 and INSR showing strong correlation (P<0.01).
What machine learning algorithm was used to determine predictive factors?
The elastic net algorithm was applied to determine the optimized predictive factors, after comparing several machine learning techniques and validating with PCA and PLS-DA.
What is the clinical significance of this study?
The findings may enable personalized r-hGH dosing strategies, improving treatment outcomes and reducing variability in growth response among GHD children.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.