🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.3724/abbs.2024055Original Research

Salidroside ameliorates acute liver transplantation rejection in rats by inhibiting neutrophil extracellular trap formation

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: Salidroside ameliorates acute liver transplantation rejection in rats by inhibiting neutrophil extracellular trap formation

Xiaoyan Qin¹,Han Wang¹,Qi Li¹,Dingheng Hu¹,Liangxu Wang¹,Baoyong Zhou¹,Rui Liao¹,Yanyao Liu¹

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Salidroside ameliorates acute liver transplantation rejection in rats by inhibiting neutrophil extracellular trap formation
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Published:2024Edition:Vol. 56, Issue 6 • pp. 833-843Citation:Xiaoyan Qin et al. (2024), Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica (生物化学与生物物理学报).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Salidroside reduces pathological liver damage and serum levels of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) in a rat model of acute liver transplantation rejection. • Salidroside inhibits neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation by downregulating the HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway, both in vivo and in vitro. • Combination therapy of salidroside with tacrolimus shows superior efficacy compared to either monotherapy, suggesting a potential adjunctive immunosuppressive strategy. • These findings highlight salidroside as a promising therapeutic candidate for preventing acute rejection after liver transplantation, with potential clinical translation.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Acute rejection is an important factor affecting the survival of recipients after liver transplantation. Salidroside has various properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and hepatoprotective properties. This study aims to investigate whether salidroside can prevent acute rejection after liver transplantation and to examine the underlying mechanisms involved. An in vivo acute rejection model is established in rats that are pretreated with tacrolimus (1 mg/kg/d) or salidroside (10 or 20 mg/kg/d) for seven days after liver transplantation. In addition, an in vitro experiment is performed using neutrophils incubated with salidroside (1, 10, 50 or 100 μM). Hematoxylin-eosin staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling staining, immunosorbent assays, immunofluorescence analysis, Evans blue staining, and western blot analysis are performed to examine the impact of salidroside on NET formation and acute rejection in vitro and in vivo. We find that Salidroside treatment reduces pathological liver damage, serum aminotransferase level, and serum levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in vivo. The expressions of proteins associated with the HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway (HMGB1, TLR-4, p-ERK1/2, p-JNK, p-P38, cleaved caspase-3, cleaved caspase-9, Bcl-2, Bax, IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6) are also decreased after salidroside treatment. In vitro experiments show that the release of HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway-associated proteins from neutrophils treated with lipopolysaccharide is decreased by salidroside. Moreover, salidroside inhibits NETosis and protects against acute rejection by regulating the HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway. Furthermore, salidroside combined with tacrolimus has a better effect than either of the other treatments alone. In summary, salidroside can prevent acute liver rejection after liver transplantation by reducing neutrophil extracellular trap development through the HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway.

1. Introduction

Liver transplantation is the mainstay treatment for end-stage liver disease and acute liver failure [1]. Acute rejection (AR), a common cause of poor prognosis after liver transplantation, occurs in approximately 20%‒30% of patients within the first 12 months [2]. Although immunosuppressive protocols have improved the prognosis of patients after liver transplantation, some studies have shown that immunosuppressive drugs have some adverse effects, including metabolic disorders, severe infection, and tumor recurrence, which limits their application in liver transplantation [3,4]. Therefore, more studies are required to elucidate AR pathogenesis to establish novel therapeutic targets for AR.

The nuclear protein high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) is highly conserved and is an immunomodulatory factor involved in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and acute rejection after liver transplantation [5,6]. Recent studies have revealed that the HMGB1-TLR-4 signaling pathway promotes the pathophysiology of liver IRI by activating the inflammatory response. Moreover, HMGB1 can induce acute rejection after liver transplantation by activating dendritic cells [7,8]. Many studies have shown that HMGB1 participates in the pathological processes of many inflammation-related diseases by regulating neutrophil activation and NET formation [9,10].

Neutrophil extracellular traps are extracellular DNA fibers decorated with histones and granular proteins [11]. NETs can neutralize and kill bacteria. However, NET dysregulation may also induce immune-related adverse events, such as hepatic IRI and acute liver rejection after liver transplantation [12,13]. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that NETosis exacerbates inflammation and contributes to brain ischemia through HMGB1 signaling. Necrotic hepatocytes induce NET formation and exacerbate hepatic IRI by releasing HMGB1 [14,15]. An earlier study demonstrated that excessive neutrophil accumulation, neutrophil hyper-reactivity, and the uncontrolled formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) after liver transplantation promote the creation of a local liver inflammatory microenvironment and acute rejection after liver transplantation [16,17]. These studies indicate that HMGB1-induced NET formation promotes the incidence and development of acute rejection after liver transplantation.

Salidroside, which is extracted from various Rhodiola plants, can treat ischemic stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, and cardiovascular diseases [18,19]. Salidroside has broad pharmacological effects, including inhibiting hypoxia, inflammation, and oxidation [20]. Moreover, salidroside can trea

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Xiaoyan Qin, Han Wang, Qi Li, Dingheng Hu, Liangxu Wang, Baoyong Zhou, Rui Liao, Yanyao Liu (2026). Salidroside ameliorates acute liver transplantation rejection in rats by inhibiting neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2024055
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of salidroside in liver transplantation rejection?

Salidroside ameliorates acute liver transplantation rejection in rats by inhibiting neutrophil extracellular trap formation, likely through the HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway.

How does salidroside affect neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)?

Salidroside inhibits NETosis by downregulating the HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway, reducing the release of pro-inflammatory proteins and NET formation.

What are the key findings of the study on salidroside and liver transplantation?

The study found that salidroside reduces liver damage, inflammatory cytokines, and NET formation in a rat model, and combining salidroside with tacrolimus shows better efficacy than either alone.

What is the clinical significance of this research?

The findings suggest salidroside could be a potential adjunctive therapy to prevent acute rejection after liver transplantation, offering a safer alternative or complement to current immunosuppressive drugs.

What signaling pathway is involved in the protective effect of salidroside?

The HMGB1/TLR-4/MAPK signaling pathway is involved, as salidroside decreases the expression of proteins in this pathway, including HMGB1, TLR-4, p-ERK1/2, p-JNK, and p-P38.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF