Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• ABL1 expression is significantly downregulated in cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury and oxidative stress models. • Knockdown of ABL1 exacerbates cardiac dysfunction, myocardial fibrosis, and ventricular remodeling after ischemia/reperfusion. • ABL1 knockdown increases oxidative stress-induced cell death, necroptosis, and reactive oxygen species accumulation in cardiomyocytes. • ABL1 exerts cardioprotective effects by targeting the Parkin-CypD pathway to regulate mitochondrial membrane permeability.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: ABL1 is involved in the regulation of multiple cellular processes, yet its functions within the cardiovascular system remains largely unexplored. In particular, its role in cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury and necroptosis has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of ABL1 in cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury and myocardial necroptosis, as well as the underlying molecular mechanisms. METHODS: (1) Animal experiment: C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into four groups: sham surgery group, ischemia/reperfusion group, ABL1 knockdown + ischemia/reperfusion group, and ABL1 negative control + ischemia/reperfusion group. Lentiviral vectors targeting ABL1 were injected in situ into the myocardium. One week later, ischemia/reperfusion injury was induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by reperfusion. ABL1 protein expression, cardiac function, myocardial fibrosis, and cardiomyocyte surface area were assessed. (2) Cell experiment: H9c2 cells were divided into four groups: negative control cell line + PBS, ABL1 knockdown cell line + PBS, negative control cell line + H2O2 500 µmol/L, and ABL1 knockdown cell line + H2O2 500 µmol/L. Additionally, H9c2 cells were divided into five groups: negative control cell line + PBS, negative control cell line + H2O2 500 µmol/L, ABL1 knockdown cell line + H2O2 500 µmol/L, ABL1 knockdown cell line + Parkin overexpression adenovirus + H2O2 500 µmol/L, and ABL1 knockdown cell line + Parkin negative control adenovirus + H2O2 500 µmol/L. Cell viability, necroptosis, reactive oxygen species levels, and mitochondrial membrane potential were measured. Expression of ABL1, Parkin, and cyclophilin D was detected, and the interaction between ABL1 and Parkin was examined. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) ABL1 protein expression was significantly downregulated in the mouse cardiac ischemia/reperfusion model. (2) Knockdown of ABL1 exacerbated ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiac dysfunction, as evidenced by decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and fractional shortening, and increased left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters. (3) Knockdown of ABL1 promoted ischemia/reperfusion-induced myocardial fibrosis and aggravated ventricular remodeling. (4) ABL1 protein expression was significantly downregulated in the cardiomyocyte oxidative stress model. (5) Knockdown of ABL1 exacerbated oxidative stress-induced cell viability loss, necroptosis, and reactive oxygen species accumulation. (6) ABL1 regulated mitochondrial membrane permeability, modulated the expression of Parkin and cyclophilin D, and regulated cellular oxidative stress levels by targeting Parkin. (7) These results indicate that ABL1 expression is significantly downregulated in both in vivo ischemia/reperfusion and in vitro oxidative stress models, and knockdown of ABL1 aggravates cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury and cardiomyocyte oxidative stress injury, acting through the Parkin-CypD pathway.
1. Introduction
Ischemic heart disease is one of the leading causes of global health burden and mortality. Although reperfusion therapies such as thrombolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention are effective in restoring blood flow, they can paradoxically exacerbate myocardial injury, leading to cardiac dysfunction, arrhythmias, fibrosis, and heart failure. This phenomenon is known as myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Despite advances in treatment, effective interventions to prevent or reverse this injury remain limited.
Traditionally, necrosis was considered a passive and uncontrolled process. However, recent studies have revealed that necrosis can be regulated through specific molecular mechanisms, termed necroptosis. Necroptosis is characterized by cell swelling and plasma membrane rupture, leading to the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and subsequent inflammation. It is mediated by extrinsic death receptor pathways and intrinsic mitochondrial pathways, and contributes to various cardiac diseases. For instance, in diabetic cardiomyopathy, necroptosis plays a major role, and its inhibition with Necrostatin-1 has shown protective effects.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Yuan Min, Han Yu, Liu Jinhong, Zhang Jingyu, Cao Jimin, Sun Teng (2026). Role and mechanism of ABL1 in myocardial necroptosis and cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21291
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the role of ABL1 in cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury?
ABL1 expression is downregulated in ischemia/reperfusion injury, and its knockdown exacerbates cardiac dysfunction, fibrosis, and remodeling, indicating a protective role.
How does ABL1 affect myocardial necroptosis?
ABL1 knockdown increases oxidative stress-induced necroptosis in cardiomyocytes, suggesting that ABL1 inhibits necroptosis.
What is the molecular mechanism of ABL1 in cardioprotection?
ABL1 targets the Parkin-CypD pathway to regulate mitochondrial membrane permeability and oxidative stress, thereby protecting against injury.
What experimental models were used in this study?
The study used a mouse model of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury and H9c2 cardiomyocytes exposed to hydrogen peroxide to induce oxidative stress.
What are the potential therapeutic implications of this research?
Enhancing ABL1 expression or activity could be a novel strategy to mitigate ischemia/reperfusion injury and necroptosis in cardiac diseases.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.