🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.3724/abbs.2024119Original Research

RNA structure in alternative splicing regulation: from mechanism to therapy

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: RNA structure in alternative splicing regulation: from mechanism to therapy

Nengcheng Bao¹,Zhechao Wang¹,Jiayan Fu¹,Haiyang Dong¹,Yongfeng Jin¹

MOE Laboratory of Biosystems Homeostasis & Protection and Innovation Center for Cell Signaling Network, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
RNA structure in alternative splicing regulation: from mechanism to therapy
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Published:2025Edition:Vol. 57, Issue 1 • pp. 3-21Citation:Nengcheng Bao et al. (2025), Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica (生物化学与生物物理学报).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • RNA secondary structures are critical regulators of alternative splicing, influencing splice site selection and exon definition. • Aberrant RNA conformations are directly linked to splicing defects that underlie various human diseases, highlighting their clinical relevance. • Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) represent a promising therapeutic strategy to correct aberrant splicing by targeting RNA structures. • Future development of RNA-targeted therapies requires a deeper understanding of the dynamic interplay between RNA structure, splicing factors, and cellular environment.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Alternative splicing is a highly intricate process that plays a crucial role in post-transcriptional regulation and significantly expands the functional proteome of a limited number of coding genes in eukaryotes. Its regulation is multifactorial, with RNA structure exerting a significant impact. Aberrant RNA conformations lead to dysregulation of splicing patterns, which directly affects the manifestation of disease symptoms. In this review, the molecular mechanisms of RNA secondary structure-mediated splicing regulation are summarized, with a focus on the complex interplay between aberrant RNA conformations and disease phenotypes resulted from splicing defects. This study also explores additional factors that reshape structural conformations, enriching our understanding of the mechanistic network underlying structure-mediated splicing regulation. In addition, an emphasis has been placed on the clinical role of targeting aberrant splicing corrections in human diseases. The principal mechanisms of action behind this phenomenon are described, followed by a discussion of prospective development strategies and pertinent challenges.

1. Introduction

The remarkable biological complexity of eukaryotes is largely attributable to the intricate regulatory networks that dynamically control protein isoform expression in a spatio-temporal manner. As an integral part of gene expression, alternative splicing is a form of post-transcriptional regulation capable of generating diverse mature RNA transcripts and functional protein isoforms from a single gene. Alternative splicing was first reported for the mRNA of adenovirus 2 and was soon proven to be a prevalent mechanism across eukaryotes [1]. Moreover, organismal complexity showed a strong positive correlation with the proportion of genes undergoing alternative splicing [2]. Species with greater tissue and cellular heterogeneity tend to exhibit higher levels of alternative splicing events on a genome-wide scale. Notably, approximately 95% of human genes are estimated to undergo alternative splicing. Furthermore, since a substantial proportion of alternative splicing events are tissue specific, the resulting splicing isoforms often exhibit subtle or radical differences in functional attributes [3]. Consequently, alternative splicing plays an indispensable role in cellular differentiation and organismal development by increasing the functional diversity of the transcriptome and proteome.

The regulation of pre-mRNA splicing is a complex multistep process. This process entails precise excision of introns and the joining of exons, both of which are orchestrated by a highly complex macromolecular assembly known as the spliceosome. Previous extensive reviews have elucidated the mechanisms underlying spliceosome assembly and pre-mRNA splicing [4‒6]. In brief, the spliceosome recognizes and binds to the exon-intron junctions (5′-splice site and 3′-splice site) of nascent pre-mRNAs, as well as to intronic branch points and polypyrimidine tracts. This facilitates exon recognition and executes two successive transesterification reactions, resulting in intron removal and exon ligation. The core of the process is the definition of the 5′- and 3′-splice sites of the exon. Based on differences in exon definitions, alternative splicing events can be categorized into the following five types: exon skipping, intron retention, alternative 5′ or 3′ splice site usage, and mutually exclusive splicing [1]. Remarkably, human introns range in length from several to hundreds of kilobases, with an average size of ~5 kb, and they are interspersed with numerous ‘decoy’ splice sites that show significant consensus sequence similarity with authentic splice sites. These ‘decoy’ splice sites have the potential to induce the inclusion of pseudo-exons [7,8]. Despite the prevalence of decoys, splicing proceeds with extraordinary fidelity, and it is strongly argued that additional sequence features surrounding core splicing signals contribute to exon-intron definition [9].

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Nengcheng Bao, Zhechao Wang, Jiayan Fu, Haiyang Dong, Yongfeng Jin (2026). RNA structure in alternative splicing regulation: from mechanism to therapy. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2024119
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of RNA structure in alternative splicing?

RNA secondary and tertiary structures can modulate the accessibility of splicing regulatory elements and splice sites, thereby influencing spliceosome assembly and exon definition. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms by which RNA structure mediates splicing regulation.

How do aberrant RNA conformations contribute to disease?

Aberrant RNA conformations can disrupt normal splicing patterns, leading to the production of abnormal protein isoforms that are associated with various human diseases. The review highlights the link between splicing defects and disease phenotypes.

What therapeutic strategies target aberrant splicing?

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are a promising therapeutic approach that can correct aberrant splicing by binding to specific RNA sequences and modulating splicing outcomes. The review discusses the mechanisms and challenges of such RNA-targeted therapies.

What are the future directions for RNA-based therapies?

Future development strategies include improving ASO delivery, specificity, and efficacy, as well as gaining a deeper understanding of the dynamic RNA structure-function relationships in cellular contexts to design more effective therapies.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF