Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• The new method for calculating hidden blood loss in TLIF yields significantly higher estimates than traditional methods (284.24 mL vs. 165.77 mL, P<0.05), accounting for 58.6% of total blood loss. • Hidden blood loss is positively correlated with the number of surgical segments and operation time, and negatively correlated with platelet count. • Decreased platelet count is an independent risk factor for hidden blood loss in TLIF. • The new method provides a more accurate assessment of perioperative blood loss, highlighting the clinical importance of hidden blood loss in TLIF.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is one of the main surgical methods for treating degenerative lumbar diseases such as lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, and lumbar spondylolisthesis. Hidden blood loss refers to the concealed loss of blood volume in patients, which is often overlooked by people. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative blood loss during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a new method, calculate the hidden blood loss based on the new method, and analyze its risk factors. METHODS: The medical records of 93 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar disc herniation, and lumbar spondylolisthesis) who were hospitalized in the Department of Spine Surgery of Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from October 2023 to October 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The general data of patients were collected, such as age, gender, height, body mass, body mass index, and whether they had hypertension and diabetes; surgical data, such as the number of surgical segments, operation time, and American Society of Anesthesiologists anesthesia grade; laboratory tests, such as prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, platelet count, fibrinogen, and D-dimer level. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between patient characteristics and postoperative hidden blood loss, and multivariate linear regression analysis was utilized to determine the independent risk factors for postoperative hidden blood loss. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The average hidden blood loss calculated by the new method for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was (284.24±352.76) mL, accounting for 58.6% of total blood loss; while the traditional method calculated an average hidden blood loss of (165.77±339.89) mL, accounting for 34.15% of total blood loss, with a significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). (2) In univariate analysis, hidden blood loss was positively correlated with the number of segments (r=0.213, P=0.040) and operation time (r=0.210, P=0.043), and negatively correlated with platelet count (r=-0.324, P=0.018). (3) In multivariate linear regression analysis, decreased platelet count was an independent risk factor for hidden blood loss (P=0.016). (4) These findings suggest that the new method provides a more accurate estimation of hidden blood loss, and hidden blood loss is an important component of perioperative total blood loss; increased number of segments, prolonged operation time, and decreased platelet count are risk factors for hidden blood loss in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, with decreased platelet count being an independent risk factor.
1. Introduction
With the growth of the aging population, the incidence of lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, lumbar spondylolisthesis, and other degenerative lumbar diseases is also increasing [1-5]. These conditions often cause low back and leg pain, severely affecting patients' quality of life. Severe degenerative lumbar diseases or those that fail conservative treatment typically require surgical intervention. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is currently one of the main surgical methods for treating degenerative lumbar diseases [5-9]. This surgical approach achieves adequate decompression while enhancing spinal stability through bone grafting and internal fixation, improving sagittal balance, and effectively alleviating clinical symptoms [10-12].
Literature reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated that compared with posterior lumbar interbody fusion, TLIF via a unilateral posterior approach allows circumferential fusion with less retraction of the dura and nerve roots, resulting in a lower incidence of neurological injury. It preserves the spinous process, interspinous and supraspinous ligaments, contralateral lamina, and ligamentum flavum, allowing early mobilization, facilitating recovery of paraspinal muscle function, and resulting in fewer complications and shorter operative time [5,13-16]. However, TLIF is associated with varying degrees of postoperative anemia, especially in multilevel procedures. If not corrected promptly, it can lead to various complications, including prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality [17-18]. Therefore, surgeons pay close attention to intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage in perioperative management. Nevertheless, clinical observations reveal that changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit are inconsistent with intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage.
The concept of hidden blood loss was first introduced by Sehat et al. in 2000, who found that hidden blood loss accounted for 26% and 49% of total perioperative blood loss in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty, respectively [19]. Previous studies attributed total blood loss solely to visible bleeding, including intraoperative hemorrhage and postoperative drainage. However, total blood loss is significantly greater than visible bleeding, indicating the presence of hidden blood loss.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Peng Yujian, Xie Yu, Wang Qianliang, Jiang Fengxian (2026). Perioperative hidden blood loss and risk factors in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion calculated by a new method. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21414
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is hidden blood loss in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)?
Hidden blood loss refers to the concealed loss of blood volume that is not accounted for by intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage. It is often overlooked but can be a significant component of total perioperative blood loss.
How does the new method for calculating hidden blood loss differ from traditional methods?
The new method accounts for the difference in composition between drainage fluid and blood, providing a more accurate estimation of hidden blood loss. In this study, it yielded significantly higher values (284.24 mL) compared to the traditional method (165.77 mL).
What are the risk factors for hidden blood loss in TLIF?
The study identified increased number of surgical segments, prolonged operation time, and decreased platelet count as risk factors for hidden blood loss. Among these, decreased platelet count was found to be an independent risk factor.
Why is it important to accurately estimate hidden blood loss in TLIF?
Accurate estimation of hidden blood loss is crucial for perioperative management, as it helps in anticipating postoperative anemia and planning appropriate interventions, potentially reducing complications and improving patient outcomes.
What is the clinical significance of hidden blood loss in TLIF?
Hidden blood loss accounts for a substantial proportion (58.6% in this study) of total perioperative blood loss. Recognizing and managing hidden blood loss can help prevent severe anemia and its associated complications, such as prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.