🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21268Original Research

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a visual analysis of current status and emerging trends

Qu Bolin¹,Ciren Lunzhu¹,Guo Jinyang¹,Meng Hanlu¹,Ding Guanxiang¹,Sang Hongpeng¹

Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University, Chifeng 024000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a visual analysis of current status and emerging trends
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1897, Issue 25 • pp. 100-112Citation:Qu Bolin et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Global research on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures has grown steadily, with China leading in publication output and Soochow University as the top institution. • The journal Spine holds the highest citation impact, while European Spine Journal publishes the most articles in this field. • Research focus has evolved from minimally invasive techniques (vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty) to broader aspects including surgical vs. nonoperative management, safety, and risk factors. • Bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace and VOSviewer reveals emerging trends and influential works, guiding future research directions.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current literature primarily focuses on comparing the clinical efficacy and surgical safety of various operative approaches for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, while there is a notable lack of research addressing the current status, hotspots, and future trends in the treatment and prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the current status, hotspots and trends of research on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by bibliometric methods. METHODS: English articles related to the treatment and prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures published between 1994 and 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric and visualization analyses were conducted using CiteSpace and VOSviewer to evaluate publication volume, geographic distribution, institutional contributions, journal sources, author contributions, keyword frequency, research hotspots, and the most influential literature. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 2,275 articles were included. Global research output on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures increased annually, with the highest number of publications in 2022 (215 articles). The literature spanned 68 countries/regions, with China leading with 644 articles. Soochow University was the most productive institution (90 articles). European Spine Journal had the highest number of publications (n=146), while Spine had the highest citation count (n=1,923), average citations per article (58.5), and H-index (45), ranking second in publication volume (n=106). Yang, Huilin was the most prolific author (n=65), and French physician Galibert, P had the highest citations (n=300). Early research hotspots focused on 'vertebroplasty', 'balloon kyphoplasty', and 'polymethylmethacrylate', which later shifted to 'surgical management' and 'nonoperative treatment', and more recently expanded to 'safety' and 'risk factors', which are expected to remain future research trends.

1. Introduction

With the global trend of population aging intensifying, vertebral compression fractures caused by osteoporosis have become a major challenge in the field of international public health. Data indicate that approximately 20% of elderly individuals over 70 years old and 16% of postmenopausal women worldwide have experienced osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures [1-3]. Such fractures can lead to persistent pain, spinal deformity, weight loss, and even life-threatening conditions, severely impacting patients' quality of life [4].

Treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures can be divided into conservative and surgical approaches. Conservative treatment typically includes bed rest, analgesic medication, bracing, and physical therapy [5]. Bed rest generally lasts three to four weeks, while precautions must be taken to prevent complications associated with prolonged immobilization (including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary infection, pressure ulcers, etc.), and close follow-up is required to prevent progressive vertebral collapse, nonunion, kyphotic deformity, and neurological deficits [6]. Unstable fractures, spinal cord involvement, or failure of conservative treatment necessitate prompt surgical intervention [7]. The goal of surgery is to rapidly relieve pain, restore mechanical stability, and improve early patient mobility. Surgical options for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures mainly include minimally invasive procedures (such as percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty) and open surgery (such as pedicle screw fixation). In recent decades, percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty have been widely used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures [8], providing rapid pain relief and functional improvement. Percutaneous vertebroplasty was initially...

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Qu Bolin, Ciren Lunzhu, Guo Jinyang, Meng Hanlu, Ding Guanxiang, Sang Hongpeng (2026). Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a visual analysis of current status and emerging trends. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21268
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main objective of this study?

The main objective is to analyze the current status, hotspots, and trends in research on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using bibliometric methods.

Which databases and tools were used in this analysis?

The study used the Web of Science Core Collection database and employed CiteSpace and VOSviewer software for bibliometric and visualization analyses.

What were the key findings regarding publication trends?

Global research output increased annually, with the highest number of publications in 2022 (215 articles). China led with 644 articles, and Soochow University was the most productive institution.

Which journals were most influential in this field?

European Spine Journal had the highest publication count (146), while Spine had the highest citation count (1,923), average citations per article (58.5), and H-index (45).

What are the emerging research hotspots in this area?

Early hotspots included vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty; later shifted to surgical vs. nonoperative management; recent focus includes safety and risk factors, which are expected to remain future trends.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF