🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21440Original Research

Mendelian randomization analysis identifies potential drug targets for spinal osteoarthritis

Zhao Ruikai¹,Wang Yu¹,Guo Xiaohui¹,Sun Zehua¹,Wang Xu¹

Department of Orthopedics, Tangshan Second Hospital, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Mendelian randomization analysis identifies potential drug targets for spinal osteoarthritis
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1902, Issue 30 • pp. 100-112Citation:Zhao Ruikai et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Mendelian randomization identified four plasma proteins (CD14, IL12B, MST1, SEMA4A) with causal links to spinal osteoarthritis. • IL12B is negatively associated with spinal osteoarthritis, while CD14, MST1, and SEMA4A are positively associated. • Drug prediction and molecular docking suggest tesmilifene, montelukast, naphthylamine, and colchicine as potential therapeutic agents. • These findings offer new biomarkers and drug targets for spinal osteoarthritis, with implications for personalized diagnosis and treatment.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal osteoarthritis is a common degenerative spinal disease that severely affects quality of life of patients, but its exact molecular mechanism remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To identify plasma proteins related to spinal osteoarthritis through Mendelian randomization analysis and provide a reference for finding new potential therapeutic targets in this disease field. METHODS: Protein data were obtained from the deCODE Genetics database (A total of 35 559 Icelandic individuals were included, and genetic association information of 4 907 plasma proteins was detected, https://www.decode.com/summarydata/). Spinal osteoarthritis data were obtained from the Osteoarthritis Genetics Consortium (A total of 826 690 samples are available for free download via https://msk.hugeamp.org/downloads.html). All data are open source and comply with ethical requirements. Wald ratio or inverse variance weighting was used to assess the causal relationship between 4 907 plasma proteins and spinal osteoarthritis, with Bonferroni correction applied to the P-values. In addition, Steiger directional test was performed to exclude reverse causality; colocalization analysis to exclude linkage disequilibrium; phenotype scanning to exclude horizontal pleiotropy; and external validation to exclude chance findings. Finally, the online analysis tool Enrichr was used to screen small-molecule compounds targeting causal proteins, and molecular docking was performed for the top-ranked compounds to predict their binding modes and energies, thereby identifying the most stable and possible binding modes. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Among 4 907 proteins, 1 878 significant protein quantitative trait loci for 1 553 proteins were screened. After Mendelian randomization analysis, four proteins were identified to have strong causal relationships with spinal osteoarthritis: monocyte CD14, interleukin-12 subunit beta (IL12B), hepatocyte growth factor-like protein (MST1), and Semaphorin-4A (SEMA4A). IL12B was negatively correlated with spinal osteoarthritis, while the others were positively correlated. Drug prediction results showed that tesmilifene targeting CD14, montelukast targeting IL12B, naphthylamine targeting MST1, and colchicine targeting SEMA4A all exhibited good binding abilities in molecular docking, with the lowest binding energies all below -6.0 kJ/mol. Comprehensive analysis indicates that these four plasma proteins may serve as potential biomarkers or drug targets for clinical screening, prevention, and intervention of spinal osteoarthritis, and also provide theoretical basis and reference value for related research in the Chinese population.

1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis can affect multiple joints, with the knee having the highest incidence, followed by the cervical spine, hand, ankle, and hip joints [1-2]. Among these, spinal osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease occurring in various segments of the spine, mainly including degeneration of the facet joint cartilage, osteophyte formation of the articular processes, and chronic degenerative changes of adjacent structures. It often manifests as chronic low back pain and limited mobility, severely affecting patients' quality of life and work capacity [3-4]. Although considerable research has been conducted on osteoarthritis, its pathogenesis remains unclear, and there is currently no effective treatment to delay disease progression [5-6]. Therefore, in-depth exploration of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis and identification of potential intervention targets are crucial for both experimental research and clinical treatment.

Proteins in the body are direct executors of cellular functions and play key roles in maintaining health and disease states [7]. Plasma proteins are mainly composed of proteins secreted or released by cells into the blood circulation, which play roles in signal transduction and regulation of biological functions between different tissues [8]. Dysregulation of plasma protein expression is a common feature of many diseases [9-10]. Circulating proteins play important roles in disease development, making them key candidate molecules for exploring therapeutic targets for osteoarthritis. In addition, plasma sample collection is relatively simple and non-invasive, and is rich in genetic information, making it a preferred material for screening population molecular markers.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are important tools for revealing the interaction between genetic and environmental factors in disease occurrence [11]. Using GWAS to investigate circulating protein levels has identified a large number of protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) [12]. Meanwhile, Mendelian randomization uses single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables to assess the potential causal effect of exposure on outcome. Mendelian randomization analysis can effectively control confounding bias and more objectively infer causality [13-15]. This method is currently widely used to identify drug targets and repurpose existing drugs [16].

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Zhao Ruikai, Wang Yu, Guo Xiaohui, Sun Zehua, Wang Xu (2026). Mendelian randomization analysis identifies potential drug targets for spinal osteoarthritis. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21440
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main objective of this study?

The main objective is to identify plasma proteins causally associated with spinal osteoarthritis using Mendelian randomization, aiming to discover new potential therapeutic targets.

Which plasma proteins were found to be causally associated with spinal osteoarthritis?

Four proteins were identified: CD14, IL12B, MST1, and SEMA4A. IL12B is negatively associated, while the others are positively associated.

How were potential drug targets validated?

Potential drug targets were validated through molecular docking of small-molecule compounds predicted by Enrichr, showing good binding energies below -6.0 kJ/mol.

What are the implications of this study for clinical practice?

The findings provide potential biomarkers for early diagnosis and risk prediction, as well as new therapeutic targets for spinal osteoarthritis, offering a theoretical basis for personalized treatment and drug development.

What are the limitations of this study?

Limitations include potential bias from different measurement methods across datasets, lack of diverse ethnic populations, and the need for further functional studies to clarify the exact roles of these proteins in disease pathogenesis.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF