🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21600Original Research

Mechanism of action of extracellular vesicles loaded with biomaterials in repairing spinal cord injury

Zheng Ying¹,Li Mengyao¹,Zheng Fanfan¹,He Zhao¹,Zhang Ning¹,Zou Jialun¹,Li Youlei¹,Gao Feng¹

Yan'an Medical College, Yan'an University

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Mechanism of action of extracellular vesicles loaded with biomaterials in repairing spinal cord injury
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1907, Issue 35 • pp. 100-112Citation:Zheng Ying et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Exosomes combined with biomaterials enhance targeted delivery and therapeutic efficiency for spinal cord injury repair. • The combination regulates neuroinflammation, promotes axonal regeneration, and alleviates oxidative stress. • Biomaterials provide structural support and anti-inflammatory properties, overcoming limitations of exosome therapy alone. • Current evidence is limited to preclinical studies; clinical trials are needed to validate efficacy and safety.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combining exosomes with biomaterials such as hydrogels and biological scaffolds enables targeted delivery, providing effective support for damaged tissue and significantly enhancing the therapeutic efficiency of exosomes, thus positively impacting spinal cord injury repair. OBJECTIVE: To review the action mechanisms and research progress of exosomes combined with biomaterials in spinal cord injury. METHODS: Databases including CNKI, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched using the Chinese and English search terms “spinal cord injury, exosomes, hydrogel, biological scaffold, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, axonal regeneration, angiogenesis.” Based on the inclusion criteria, 106 articles were finally included in this review. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Current research focuses on the repair of secondary injury after spinal cord injury, and how to better alleviate the damage caused by secondary injury is a key research question. Exosomes combined with biomaterials treat spinal cord injury mainly through regulating neuroinflammation, promoting axonal regeneration, and alleviating oxidative stress. This approach avoids immune rejection, solves the problem of low bioavailability of exosomes, and provides effective tissue support, thereby alleviating secondary symptoms after spinal cord injury. Most studies on exosome-loaded biomaterials for spinal cord injury are limited to cell and animal experiments, lacking clinical trial data. Future research should focus on further mechanistic studies, safety evaluations, and related clinical trials.

1. Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a highly disabling neurological disorder that leads to motor and sensory dysfunction. Secondary injury, characterized by oxidative stress, ischemia-hypoxia, inflammation, and apoptosis, exacerbates the condition and worsens prognosis. The major clinical challenge is to mitigate secondary damage and promote neural recovery.

Exosomes, natural nanovesicles secreted by cells, carry proteins, mRNAs, miRNAs, and lipids, and can cross the blood-spinal cord barrier to modulate neuronal activity and tissue repair. They exhibit low immunogenicity and anti-inflammatory properties, but their therapeutic efficacy is limited by low bioavailability. Combining exosomes with biomaterials such as hydrogels and scaffolds offers a promising strategy to enhance their delivery and retention at the injury site.

Biomaterials provide a three-dimensional support for axonal regeneration and exhibit anti-inflammatory properties. They can also be loaded with therapeutic factors to modulate the local microenvironment. Therefore, the combination of exosomes and biomaterials holds great potential for improving functional recovery after SCI. This review summarizes the mechanisms and research progress of this combined approach.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Zheng Ying, Li Mengyao, Zheng Fanfan, He Zhao, Zhang Ning, Zou Jialun, Li Youlei, Gao Feng (2026). Mechanism of action of extracellular vesicles loaded with biomaterials in repairing spinal cord injury. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21600
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of exosomes in spinal cord injury repair?

Exosomes carry bioactive molecules that modulate inflammation, promote angiogenesis, and protect the blood-spinal cord barrier, thereby aiding neural repair. However, their low bioavailability limits their efficacy.

How do biomaterials enhance exosome therapy for spinal cord injury?

Biomaterials such as hydrogels and scaffolds provide structural support, prolong exosome retention, and enable targeted delivery, thereby improving therapeutic outcomes.

What are the main mechanisms of exosome-loaded biomaterials in treating spinal cord injury?

The main mechanisms include regulation of neuroinflammation, promotion of axonal regeneration, and alleviation of oxidative stress, which collectively reduce secondary injury and enhance functional recovery.

What are the current limitations of this therapeutic approach?

Current evidence is based on preclinical studies; clinical trials are lacking. Further research is needed to elucidate precise molecular mechanisms, ensure safety, and translate findings to clinical practice.

What future directions are suggested for this field?

Future research should focus on mechanistic studies, long-term safety evaluations, and well-designed clinical trials to validate the efficacy of exosome-loaded biomaterials for spinal cord injury.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF