🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21575Original Research

In vitro drug release of polymyxin B sulfate-loaded bone cement

Mao Jiaojiao¹,Qian Chenyue¹,Bi Feiyu¹,Bao Jianan¹

Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
In vitro drug release of polymyxin B sulfate-loaded bone cement
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1907, Issue 35 • pp. 100-112Citation:Mao Jiaojiao et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Polymyxin B sulfate-loaded bone cement shows sustained release with peak release at 0-0.5 h and 90% of total release within 7 days. • Smaller (5 mm) bone cement microspheres exhibit higher drug release rate and cumulative release compared to larger (7 mm) ones. • The release kinetics follow the Ritger-Peppas model with Fickian diffusion as the dominant mechanism. • Optimal timing for secondary debridement is 5-7 days post-implantation to balance efficacy and minimize resistance risk.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For diabetic foot infections, traditional vancomycin-loaded bone cement has a limited antibacterial spectrum, and there is an urgent need for novel drug carriers. OBJECTIVE: To explore the in vitro elution characteristics of polymyxin B sulfate-loaded bone cement. METHODS: Polymyxin B sulfate powder was uniformly mixed with polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and poured into molds to prepare bone cement microspheres with diameters of 5 and 7 mm. The two types of bone cement microspheres of different diameters were immersed in 1 mL of PBS, and elution samples were collected at specific time points. The concentration of polymyxin B sulfate in the eluent was determined by mass spectrometry, and the drug release pattern was analyzed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The drug release peaks for both types of bone cement microspheres occurred between 0 and 0.5 h, after which the release rate gradually decreased. Inter-group comparison showed that the drug release rate and cumulative release rate of the 5 mm diameter microspheres were higher than those of the 7 mm diameter microspheres. The cumulative drug release rates at 14 days for the 5 mm and 7 mm diameter microspheres were 5.08% and 3.37%, respectively. The drug release from both types of bone cement microspheres of different diameters reached 90% of the total release within 7 days, approaching the release endpoint. The in vitro drug release curves of both types of microspheres conformed to the Ritger-Peppas model (R2=0.998 56, 0.990 90), with Fickian diffusion as the dominant mechanism. (2) The polymyxin B sulfate-loaded bone cement exhibited sustained release characteristics, with drug release mainly concentrated in the first 7 days and low release thereafter. Therefore, 5-7 days after implantation is the optimal timing for secondary debridement; continued retention poses a higher risk of inducing bacterial resistance. The drug release rate is related to the size of the bone cement, and in clinical application, bone cement microspheres with a diameter of about 5 mm can be prioritized to balance rapid drug release and long-term antibacterial needs.

1. Introduction

With economic development and improved living standards, the global prevalence of diabetes has risen rapidly, currently affecting approximately 14% of adults [1]. Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a common complication, occurring in about 25% of diabetic patients [2-3], with a mortality rate as high as 12%, and more than half of amputees may die within 5 years, posing a serious threat to patient health [4]. Current clinical guidelines for DFI primarily include debridement, negative-pressure wound therapy, revascularization, and antimicrobial therapy [5-6]. However, diabetic patients often have poor lower limb blood flow, arteriolosclerosis, or even occlusion [7], which impairs the delivery of systemic antibiotics to the wound site, compromising anti-infective efficacy.

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement is a biomaterial used to fill bone gaps or cavities. Since its first application in joint arthroplasty in the 1960s, it has significantly improved surgical success rates and revolutionized orthopedic surgery. As a unique bone repair material, antibiotic-loaded bone cement can release high local drug concentrations while reducing systemic toxicity, achieving both prophylaxis and treatment of infection. Previous studies have demonstrated significant benefits of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in treating diabetic foot infections, with vancomycin being the most commonly added antibiotic [8-9]. However, current epidemiological studies indicate that Gram-negative bacteria are now more frequently isolated than Gram-positive bacteria in DFI, with multidrug-resistant organisms, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae, accounting for up to 36.2% of infections [10]. Moreover, in patients with Wagner grade 3-5, the incidence of extensively drug-resistant or even pan-drug-resistant bacteria is higher, making treatment more challenging [11]. Therefore, traditional vancomycin-loaded bone cement has a limited antibacterial spectrum, and there is an urgent need for novel drug carriers. Polymyxin B is effective against pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and foreign case reports have shown successful treatment of resistant Gram-negative osteomyelitis [12-14], but large-scale clinical studies are lacking. This study aims to explore the in vitro elution characteristics of polymyxin B sulfate-loaded bone cement, providing a basis for the treatment of diabetic foot infections caused by extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and laying the groundwork for future clinical safety and efficacy evaluations.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Mao Jiaojiao, Qian Chenyue, Bi Feiyu, Bao Jianan (2026). In vitro drug release of polymyxin B sulfate-loaded bone cement. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21575
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the optimal size of bone cement microspheres for drug delivery?

The study found that 5 mm diameter microspheres released drug faster and had a higher cumulative release compared to 7 mm microspheres, suggesting that smaller microspheres may be preferred for balancing rapid release and sustained antibacterial effect.

When is the best time for secondary debridement after implantation of polymyxin B-loaded bone cement?

Based on the release profile, 5-7 days after implantation is the optimal timing for secondary debridement, as drug release is mainly concentrated in the first 7 days, and prolonged retention may increase the risk of bacterial resistance.

What is the release kinetics of polymyxin B from bone cement?

The release curves fit the Ritger-Peppas model with Fickian diffusion as the dominant mechanism, indicating a diffusion-controlled release process.

Why is polymyxin B used in bone cement for diabetic foot infections?

Polymyxin B is effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, which are increasingly prevalent in diabetic foot infections, and local delivery via bone cement provides high concentrations while minimizing systemic toxicity.

What are the limitations of traditional vancomycin-loaded bone cement?

Vancomycin-loaded bone cement has a limited antibacterial spectrum, primarily targeting Gram-positive bacteria, and is inadequate for infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens, which are now more common in diabetic foot infections.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF