🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.1186/s13287-025-04862-wOriginal Research

FTO-mediated m6A modification regulates the osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs by targeting FOXO1

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: FTO-mediated m6A modification regulates the osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs by targeting FOXO1

Zhaohua Wang¹,Si Wen¹,Huizheng Li¹,Xiaosu Wang¹,Shu Guo¹,Shude Yang¹

Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
FTO-mediated m6A modification regulates the osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs by targeting FOXO1
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Published:2026Edition:Vol. 17, Issue 1 • pp. 39Citation:Zhaohua Wang et al. (2026), Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Stem Cell Research & Therapy (干细胞研究与转化).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • FOXO1 is identified as a key m6A-modified gene during ADSC osteogenesis, with FTO demethylase enhancing RUNX2 and suppressing PPARG to promote differentiation. • FTO knockdown impairs ADSC migration, proliferation, and osteogenesis, highlighting its critical role in bone regeneration. • Mechanistically, FTO translocates to the cytoplasm and directly binds FOXO1 mRNA at the 1760th bp site, revealing a novel regulatory axis. • NSAIDs containing FTO inhibitors impede ADSC-mediated bone formation, suggesting potential drug interactions in clinical bone repair.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Using adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) has recently become a crucial approach for treating bone defects owing to their ease of accessibility and substantial differentiation potential. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification greatly influences biological processes and determines the differentiation fate of stem cells. However, the specific mechanisms by which m6A modification influences the osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs remain unclear. We identified FOXO1 as the key m6A-modified gene during the osteogenesis of ADSCs. Furthermore, demethylase FTO enhanced RUNX2 expression while inhibiting PPARG expression by modifying FOXO1, thereby facilitating ADSC osteogenesis. FTO knockdown inhibited ADSC migration and proliferation and impaired osteogenesis by suppressing FOXO1. At the mechanistic level, we first revealed that FTO was exported to the cytoplasm and then directly bound with FOXO1 mRNA at its 1760th bp site. Consistent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) containing FTO inhibitors impeded ADSC-mediated bone formation both in vivo and in vitro. In summary, our study reveals the role of m6A modification based on the FTO–FOXO1–RUNX2/PPARG axis in regulating the osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs, thereby improving the clinical use of ADSCs and providing strategies for related drug applications in bone regeneration.

1. Introduction

Bone defects are caused by trauma, tumors, infections, congenital deformities and the exacerbation of related diseases. Over 6 million patients suffer from bone defects annually in China [1]. Owing to the limited regenerative capacity of bone tissue, defects over the critical size often result in delayed or even nonunion fractures. Traditional transplantation material, including autogenous, allograft, and synthetic bone substitutes, exhibits certain limitations, such as donor site defects, poor bone quality, and confined applicability of graft materials. The latest bone tissue engineering concept combines biomaterials with cells or healing factors to promote bone regeneration [2]. Stem cell therapy, an important branch of regenerative medicine, provides a new option for patients who are unfit for traditional treatments.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a common type of somatic stem cells known for their self-renewal and differentiation abilities. They are primarily derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord [3]. Compared with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), ADSCs are better suited for bone tissue regeneration. Bone marrow aspiration is challenging, and BMSCs are uncommon, constituting less than 0.01% of monocytes [4]. Compared with BMSCs, ADSCs are more readily available and abundant. Additionally, ADSCs demonstrate (1) similar or even higher regenerative capacity; (2) higher proliferative activity; (3) greater secreted regeneration factors; (4) immunosuppressive ability [5]. To stimulate angiogenesis and osteogenesis, ADSCs release a variety of peptides, hormones, and growth factors. They also produce chemokines to recruit endogenous stem cells to bone defect sites [6].

Epigenetic regulation of gene expression is critical to cellular function, as it controls the synthesis of proteins and modulatory molecules. In eukaryotes, DNA is tightly compacted into chromatin, limiting transcriptional machinery access. However, epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, can induce heritable changes in gene expression by altering chromatin structure and accessibility [7]. These processes extensively influence cell phenotype and function, which is crucial for MSC fate determination, differentiation, and functional specialization, with broad implications for stem cell biology and regenerative medicine [8]. Over 80% of all RNA methylation occurs ...

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Zhaohua Wang, Si Wen, Huizheng Li, Xiaosu Wang, Shu Guo, Shude Yang (2026). FTO-mediated m6A modification regulates the osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs by targeting FOXO1. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-025-04862-w
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of FTO in osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs?

FTO, as a demethylase, enhances osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs by modifying FOXO1 mRNA, leading to increased RUNX2 expression and decreased PPARG expression, thereby promoting bone formation.

How does m6A modification affect ADSC osteogenesis?

m6A modification regulates gene expression post-transcriptionally. In ADSCs, m6A modification of FOXO1 mRNA is critical; FTO removes m6A marks, stabilizing FOXO1 and promoting osteogenic differentiation.

What is the clinical significance of this study?

The study reveals that NSAIDs containing FTO inhibitors can impede ADSC-mediated bone formation, suggesting caution in using such drugs during bone regeneration therapies. It also provides a potential target (FTO-FOXO1 axis) for enhancing ADSC-based bone repair.

What are the key findings regarding FOXO1 in this research?

FOXO1 is identified as a key m6A-modified gene during ADSC osteogenesis. FTO directly binds to FOXO1 mRNA at the 1760th bp site, and its knockdown impairs ADSC migration, proliferation, and osteogenesis.

How do ADSCs compare to BMSCs for bone regeneration?

ADSCs are more readily available and abundant than BMSCs, and they exhibit similar or higher regenerative capacity, higher proliferative activity, greater secretion of regenerative factors, and immunosuppressive ability, making them better suited for bone tissue regeneration.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF