🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21364Original Research

Exosomes promote diabetic wound healing: a visual analysis of research hotspots and evolutionary trends

Jian Xichao¹,Shao Jingjie¹,Tang Shihan¹,Qi Fang¹,Deng Chengliang¹

Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563003, Guizhou Province, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Exosomes promote diabetic wound healing: a visual analysis of research hotspots and evolutionary trends
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1901, Issue 29 • pp. 100-112Citation:Jian Xichao et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • The number of publications on exosomes promoting diabetic wound healing has been continuously increasing from 2014 to 2024, indicating that this field has become an important research direction for the treatment of diabetic complications. • China and the United States are the leading contributors in this research area, with China having the highest number of publications. • Current research hotspots are shifting from molecular mechanisms to systematic interventions, with future focus on angiogenesis, macrophages, antibacterial strategies, and hydrogels. • Multidisciplinary integration, such as combining biomaterials and gene editing technologies, may further expand the application potential of exosomes in diabetic wound healing.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes wound is one of the serious complications of diabetes patients, and its complex pathological mechanism and clinical treatment dilemma is still a major challenge. In recent years, exosomes have become a new focus in the field of diabetes wound research because they play a key role in intercellular communication, immune regulation, and tissue repair. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the research hotspots and evolutionary trends of exosomes in diabetic wound healing. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science core collection to identify English literature focusing on exosomes in diabetic wound healing and published between the inception of the database and December 31, 2024. The annual publication volume was analyzed to track changes over time. Visual analyses using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software were performed on the retrieved literature to examine key aspects such as authors, countries, institutions, journals, and keywords, providing insights into the current research landscape and evolving hot topics in exosomes for diabetic wound healing. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: From 2014 to 2024, a total of 424 publications on exosome-promoted diabetic wound healing were produced, contributed by 2,883 authors from 46 countries and featured in 199 journals. In the realm of exosome-promoted diabetic wound healing, China had the highest number of publications, followed by the United States. The journals 'Journal of Nanobiotechnology' and 'Advanced Healthcare Materials' published the most papers and had high influence. Author Chen Zhenbing and Huazhong University of Science and Technology were the most productive author and institution, respectively, but the researcher clusters have not yet reached a certain scale, and future collaboration needs to be strengthened. Global research focus mainly concentrated on 10 thematic clusters including adipose stem cells, diabetic wounds, diabetic wound healing, wound healing, endoplasmic reticulum stress, microvesicles, collagen, proteomics, and diabetic foot infection. The research hotspots in this field are undergoing a transition from molecular mechanisms to systematic interventions. Future research hotspots will focus on angiogenesis, macrophages, antibacterial, and hydrogels. On this basis, integrating multidisciplinary technologies to achieve more effective precision treatment and optimize management strategies for diabetic wounds.

1. Introduction

Diabetic wounds are a serious chronic complication that significantly impacts patients across different countries, ages, and genders, consuming substantial global health resources [1-2]. Normally, the wound healing process involves four stages: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling [3]. However, due to the long-term hyperglycemic environment in diabetic patients, wounds exhibit persistent inflammation, impaired angiogenesis, and dysregulated extracellular matrix remodeling, leading to impaired healing [4-6]. Consequently, diabetic wounds often fail to heal spontaneously. Diabetic foot ulcers are the most severe type of diabetic wounds. According to statistics, the incidence of diabetic foot ulcers in diabetic patients ranges from 7.2% to 15%, with 50%-60% of ulcers developing secondary infections that may require amputation in severe cases. The 5-year mortality rate for patients with diabetic foot ulcers is approximately 30%, and for those undergoing amputation, the mortality rate exceeds 70% [7]. This phenomenon imposes a huge burden on patients and healthcare systems, especially as the number of diabetic patients continues to rise.

Exosomes are cell-derived nanovesicles that carry proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and other substances, secreted by cells under physiological and pathological conditions [4,8-9]. Recent studies have shown that exosomes can improve wound healing by accelerating angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and re-epithelialization, offering great promise for diabetic wound treatment [10-12]. For instance, SONG et al. [13] demonstrated that adipose-derived stem cell exosomes effectively reduce inflammation and promote angiogenesis, thereby accelerating diabetic wound healing. Notably, in the field of wound repair, the combination of exosomes with biomaterials has become a research hotspot. Exosomes can serve as carriers of bioactive molecules and, when modified or loaded into biomaterials, can modulate the microenvironment and activate wound repair mechanisms [14-15]. WENG et al. [16] showed that a multifunctional hydrogel dressing loaded with mesenchymal stem cell exosomes and macrophage exosomes significantly promoted diabetic wound healing through synergistic anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, pro-angiogenic, and macrophage immune-regulating mechanisms. LI et al. [17] designed an anti-swelling hydrogel system with functionalized gold nanorods and M2 macrophage-derived exosomes, achieving antibacterial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and pro-angiogenic effects via near-infrared photothermal synergy, with promising results in diabetic oral mucosal ulcers and full-thickness skin defect models. Furthermore, overexpression of exosomal contents (e.g., miRNAs) is also an important direction in tissue engineering research. HUANG et al. [18] showed that engineered exosomes overexpressing miR-31-5p effectively promoted angiogenesis, fibrogenesis, and re-epithelialization by targeting hypoxia-inducible factor inhibitor and epithelial membrane protein 1.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Jian Xichao, Shao Jingjie, Tang Shihan, Qi Fang, Deng Chengliang (2026). Exosomes promote diabetic wound healing: a visual analysis of research hotspots and evolutionary trends. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21364
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of exosomes in diabetic wound healing?

Exosomes play a crucial role in diabetic wound healing by facilitating intercellular communication, immune regulation, and tissue repair. They carry proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids that can accelerate angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and re-epithelialization, thereby improving wound healing outcomes.

Which countries are leading in exosome research for diabetic wounds?

According to the visual analysis, China has the highest number of publications in exosome research for diabetic wound healing, followed by the United States. These two countries are the major contributors in this field.

What are the current research hotspots in exosome-mediated diabetic wound healing?

Current research hotspots include adipose stem cells, diabetic wounds, wound healing, endoplasmic reticulum stress, microvesicles, collagen, proteomics, and diabetic foot infection. The field is transitioning from molecular mechanisms to systematic interventions, with future focus on angiogenesis, macrophages, antibacterial strategies, and hydrogels.

How can exosome-based therapies be optimized for diabetic wound treatment?

Exosome-based therapies can be optimized by integrating multidisciplinary technologies such as biomaterials and gene editing. For example, engineering exosomes to overexpress specific miRNAs or combining them with hydrogels can enhance their therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, personalized adjustments based on diabetes type and wound severity may improve treatment outcomes.

What are the challenges in translating exosome-based therapies to clinical practice?

Challenges include the need for scalable production, stability, and clinical safety of exosomes. Additionally, the mechanisms of exosomes from different cell sources may vary, and personalized treatment strategies need to be developed. Overcoming these obstacles requires further research and collaboration.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF