Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• DILI is a leading cause of acute liver failure, with drug metabolism and immune responses playing central roles. • Genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters significantly influence individual susceptibility to DILI. • Current diagnostic biomarkers lack specificity; novel biomarkers and risk prediction models are urgently needed. • Management of DILI relies on early withdrawal of the offending drug, with targeted therapies such as NAC and corticosteroids for specific phenotypes.
Abstract
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a significant cause of acute liver failure and a major challenge in drug development and clinical practice. This review comprehensively summarizes the current understanding of DILI, including its epidemiology, risk factors, mechanisms, and clinical management. We discuss the role of drug metabolism, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and immune-mediated pathways in the pathogenesis of DILI. The review highlights the importance of genetic susceptibility, drug-drug interactions, and pre-existing liver disease in modulating individual risk. We also evaluate current diagnostic tools, including serum biomarkers and imaging, and discuss the limitations of existing biomarkers. Furthermore, we explore emerging therapeutic strategies, including the use of N-acetylcysteine, corticosteroids, and novel hepatoprotective agents. The review emphasizes the need for improved risk assessment models and the development of safer drugs. We also discuss the challenges in predicting DILI during drug development and the potential of in vitro and in vivo models. Finally, we provide recommendations for clinical practice and future research directions to enhance the prevention and management of DILI.
1. Introduction
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) represents a major clinical challenge, accounting for approximately 50% of all cases of acute liver failure in the United States and a substantial proportion of drug withdrawals from the market. The liver is particularly susceptible to drug toxicity due to its central role in drug metabolism and its high exposure to ingested xenobiotics. DILI can manifest as a wide spectrum of liver injury, ranging from asymptomatic elevations in liver enzymes to fulminant hepatic failure. The mechanisms underlying DILI are complex and multifactorial, involving both intrinsic (dose-dependent) and idiosyncratic (dose-independent) pathways. Intrinsic hepatotoxins, such as acetaminophen, cause predictable liver injury, whereas idiosyncratic DILI occurs unpredictably and is often immune-mediated. Over the past decades, significant progress has been made in understanding the genetic, environmental, and immunological factors that contribute to DILI susceptibility. However, the accurate prediction and early diagnosis of DILI remain elusive, and therapeutic options are limited. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on DILI, with a focus on mechanisms, risk assessment, and emerging therapeutic strategies.
Epidemiological studies have shown that DILI is a global health issue, with an estimated annual incidence of 14-19 cases per 100,000 persons. The most commonly implicated drugs include antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antiepileptics, and herbal and dietary supplements. The clinical presentation of DILI is highly variable, and the diagnosis is often challenging due to the lack of specific biomarkers. The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) is widely used to assess causality, but it has limitations. Recent advances in genomics and proteomics have identified potential biomarkers that may improve diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, the development of in vitro models, such as three-dimensional liver organoids and microfluidic devices, offers new opportunities to study DILI mechanisms and screen for hepatotoxicity. This review synthesizes the latest evidence and provides a framework for clinicians and researchers to better understand and manage DILI.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
ZHANG Wei, LI Ming, WANG Fang, CHEN Li, LIU Yang (2025). Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Mechanisms, Risk Assessment, and Therapeutic Strategies. Chinese Journal of New Drugs. https://doi.org/cast_zgxyzz_1236731778380133049
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is drug-induced liver injury (DILI)?
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an adverse reaction to medications or other substances that causes liver damage, ranging from mild enzyme elevations to acute liver failure. It can be caused by prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, herbal supplements, and recreational drugs.
What are the common risk factors for DILI?
Common risk factors include age, gender, genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes, underlying liver disease, alcohol consumption, and concurrent use of multiple medications. Certain drug classes, such as antibiotics and NSAIDs, are more frequently associated with DILI.
How is DILI diagnosed?
Diagnosis of DILI involves a thorough clinical history, exclusion of other causes of liver injury, and laboratory tests including liver function tests. The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) is often used to assess causality. Liver biopsy may be helpful in uncertain cases.
What are the treatment options for DILI?
The primary treatment is withdrawal of the offending drug. In severe cases, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is used, especially for acetaminophen toxicity. Corticosteroids may be considered for immune-mediated DILI. Liver transplantation may be necessary for fulminant hepatic failure.
Can DILI be prevented?
Prevention strategies include careful drug selection, monitoring liver enzymes in high-risk patients, avoiding unnecessary polypharmacy, and considering genetic testing for individuals with a history of DILI. Patient education about the risks of herbal supplements is also important.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.