Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Single-cell omics technologies enable unprecedented resolution of adipose tissue heterogeneity, revealing rare progenitor subpopulations and lineage hierarchies. • These technologies provide biomarkers for dysfunctional adipose states linked to cancer, obesity, and metabolic syndrome, with implications for targeted therapies. • Understanding adipose heterogeneity is critical for standardizing regenerative medicine products, including cell-based and cell-free approaches. • The review highlights advances in single-cell omics that can improve clinical translation and quality control of adipose-derived therapeutics.
Abstract
Single-cell omics technologies that profile genes (genomic and epigenomic) and determine the abundance of mRNA (transcriptomic), protein (proteomic and secretomic), lipids (lipidomic), and extracellular matrix (matrisomic) support the dissection of adipose tissue heterogeneity at unprecedented resolution in a temporally and spatially defined manner. In particular, cell omics technologies may provide innovative biomarkers for the identification of rare specific progenitor cell subpopulations, assess transcriptional and proteomic changes affecting cell proliferation and immunomodulatory potential, and accurately define the lineage hierarchy and differentiation status of progenitor cells. Unraveling adipose tissue complexity may also provide for the precise assessment of a dysfunctional state, which has been associated with cancer, as cancer-associated adipocytes play an important role in shaping the tumor microenvironment supporting tumor progression and metastasis, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The information collected by single-cell omics has relevant implications for regenerative medicine because adipose tissue is an accessible source of multipotent cells; alternative cell-free approaches, including the use of adipose tissue stromal cell-conditioned medium, extracellular vesicles, or decellularized extracellular matrix, are clinically valid options. Subcutaneous white adipose tissue, which is generally harvested via liposuction, is highly heterogeneous because of intrinsic biological variability and extrinsic inconsistencies in the harvesting and processing procedures. The current limited understanding of adipose tissue heterogeneity impinges on the definition of quality standards appropriate for clinical translation, which requires consistency and uniformity of the administered product. We review the methods used for dissecting adipose tissue heterogeneity and provide an overview of advances in omics technology that may contribute to the exploration of heterogeneity and dynamics of adipose tissue at the single-cell level.
1. Introduction
Over the last decades, the therapeutic potential of autologous adipose tissue-derived material transplantation has been explored in several regenerative medicine clinical trials [1]. Most of the preclinical and translational research employed adipose tissue-derived stromal cells isolated by enzymatic digestion of white adipose tissue (WAT), mainly obtained from subcutaneous fat depots [2, 3]; the regenerative potential of mechanically manipulated adipose tissue has also been evaluated [4]; moreover, adipose tissue paracrine factors, including extracellular vesicles (EVs) and cell-conditioned medium, and decellularized extracellular matrix, have also been considered as cell-free therapeutics [5], in order to circumvent the limited transplanted cell viability in the hypoxic microenvironment at the administration site [6, 7].
Therapeutic efficacy of adipose tissue derivatives in regenerative medicine, dermatology, plastic and aesthetic surgery procedures has been ascribed to both the action of resident multipotent stromal cells and paracrine signals. Nonetheless, inconsistencies in the methods used for adipose tissue manipulation currently limit the reproducible therapeutic efficacy of adipose tissue derivatives, but progressive efforts in the standardization of the procedures will eventually address this issue. Another source of variability is the intrinsic biological heterogeneity, which requires extensive studies at the cellular level to unravel the biological properties, function and clinical potential of adipose tissue derivatives [8]. Single-cell technologies measure the abundance of molecules in individual cells and represent a unique tool to finely dissect tissue cellular and functional heterogeneity, which has been more extensively used for the analysis of the human tumor microenvironment [9].
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Giuliana Di Rocco, Angelo Trivisonno, Giovanni Trivisonno, Gabriele Toietta (2026). Dissecting human adipose tissue heterogeneity using single-cell omics technologies. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-03931-w
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are single-cell omics technologies?
Single-cell omics technologies are advanced methods that profile the molecular characteristics of individual cells, including genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, lipidomic, and matrisomic data, enabling high-resolution analysis of tissue heterogeneity.
How can single-cell omics improve regenerative medicine?
By revealing the heterogeneity of adipose tissue and identifying specific progenitor cell subpopulations, single-cell omics can help standardize adipose-derived therapeutics, improve quality control, and optimize cell-free approaches like extracellular vesicles for clinical use.
What is the significance of adipose tissue heterogeneity in disease?
Adipose tissue heterogeneity is linked to dysfunctional states such as cancer, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Cancer-associated adipocytes can shape the tumor microenvironment, promoting progression and metastasis, so understanding heterogeneity is crucial for developing targeted therapies.
What are the challenges in using adipose tissue for therapy?
Challenges include intrinsic biological variability and inconsistencies in harvesting and processing procedures, which affect the reproducibility and efficacy of adipose-derived products. Standardization is needed for consistent clinical outcomes.
What is the role of extracellular vesicles in adipose tissue therapy?
Extracellular vesicles derived from adipose tissue stromal cells are considered cell-free therapeutics that can deliver paracrine signals, potentially avoiding issues with cell viability and offering a safer, more consistent alternative to cell transplantation.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.