🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21235Original Research

Biomarkers for diabetic foot ulcers: single-cell transcriptomics bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation

YANG Wenyan¹,WANG Huayu¹,YANG Like¹,PANG Xue¹,WANG Yutao¹

First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, Shandong Province, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Biomarkers for diabetic foot ulcers: single-cell transcriptomics bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1896, Issue 24 • pp. 100-112Citation:YANG Wenyan et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Epithelial cells are identified as the key cell subpopulation in diabetic foot ulcer pathogenesis via single-cell transcriptomics. • S100A14 and SFN are novel biomarkers significantly upregulated in diabetic foot ulcer tissues and validated in rat models. • Integration of single-cell and bulk transcriptomics with WGCNA/hdWGCNA reveals robust gene modules associated with diabetic foot ulcers. • These findings provide potential therapeutic targets for diabetic foot ulcer treatment.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Factors such as infection, limb ischemia, and histiocyte activation are involved in diabetic foot ulcers, but the key cell subpopulations influencing diabetic foot ulcer healing remain unclear, and specific biomarkers for diabetic foot ulcers have yet to be identified. Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a publicly accessible database managed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information that stores high-throughput gene expression data, allowing users to freely submit, share, query, and analyze data. Secondary analysis of published data can save research costs and uncover new research targets and ideas. OBJECTIVE: To screen biomarkers for diabetic foot ulcers using single-cell transcriptome and conventional transcriptome bioinformatics analysis, high-dimensional weighted gene co-expression network analysis (hdWGCNA), and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). METHODS: The single-cell transcriptome dataset GSE165816, containing non-healing ulcer tissue samples from diabetic foot ulcer patients and foot skin samples from diabetic patients, was downloaded from GEO. After data quality control, dimensionality reduction, differential analysis, cell type annotation, and pseudotime analysis, cell types spanning the entire course of diabetic foot ulcers were identified, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained. hdWGCNA identified gene modules highly correlated with diabetic foot ulcers. Conventional transcriptome datasets GSE68183 and GSE80178, containing non-healing ulcer tissue samples from diabetic foot ulcer patients and foot skin samples from diabetic patients, were downloaded for differential analysis to screen DEGs, and WGCNA was used to identify diabetic foot ulcer-related gene modules. The DEGs from single-cell transcriptome, DEGs from conventional transcriptome samples, and module genes from WGCNA and hdWGCNA were integrated to screen biomarkers for diabetic foot ulcers. The GSE134431 dataset was downloaded as a validation conventional transcriptome dataset, and the expression levels of diabetic foot ulcer biomarkers were compared in single-cell transcriptome and validation conventional transcriptome datasets. Diabetic and diabetic foot ulcer rat models were replicated, wound tissue was collected, and immunohistochemistry and western blot were used to detect biomarker expression levels. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Single-cell transcriptome data analysis showed that epithelial cell differentiation spanned the entire pathological process of diabetic foot ulcers. A total of 146 DEGs were obtained from single-cell transcriptome between groups, including 59 upregulated and 87 downregulated DEGs. hdWGCNA identified 19 gene modules related to diabetic foot ulcers, containing 476 core genes. Conventional transcriptome data analysis yielded a total of 913 DEGs, including 343 upregulated and 570 downregulated DEGs. WGCNA obtained 19 diabetic foot ulcer-related gene modules, containing 887 genes. Two biomarkers for diabetic foot ulcers were screened: S100A14 and SFN. The expression levels of these two genes in diabetic foot ulcer samples were higher than those in diabetic foot skin samples in both single-cell transcriptome and validation conventional transcriptome datasets. Animal experiments showed that the expression levels of S100A14 and SFN in wound tissue of diabetic foot ulcer rats were higher than those in back skin tissue of diabetic rats. The results indicate that the pathological process of diabetic foot ulcers involves multiple cell types, among which epithelial cells are the key cell subpopulation. S100A14 and SFN are significantly upregulated in diabetic foot ulcer samples and are potential targets for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

1. Introduction

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common complication of diabetes, clinically manifested as foot infection, ulceration, or deep tissue destruction [1]. Up to 80% of amputations in diabetic patients are caused by DFU [2]. Data show that the 1-year mortality rate associated with DFU is approximately 5%, and the 5-year mortality rate is as high as 42% [3]. Wound healing is a complex and orderly biological process involving inflammation, re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, histiocyte activation, and extracellular matrix synthesis and degradation [4]. Due to hyperglycemia and inflammatory responses, DFU is difficult to heal and has a high recurrence rate [5]. Uncovering the potential mechanisms affecting DFU healing is of great clinical significance for improving patient prognosis and reducing amputation and mortality rates.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
YANG Wenyan, WANG Huayu, YANG Like, PANG Xue, WANG Yutao (2026). Biomarkers for diabetic foot ulcers: single-cell transcriptomics bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21235
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key biomarkers identified for diabetic foot ulcers?

The study identified S100A14 and SFN as potential biomarkers for diabetic foot ulcers, showing significantly higher expression in ulcer tissues compared to diabetic foot skin.

How were the biomarkers discovered?

The biomarkers were discovered through integrated analysis of single-cell transcriptomics (GSE165816) and bulk transcriptomics (GSE68183, GSE80178) using differential expression analysis, WGCNA, and hdWGCNA, followed by validation in an independent dataset and rat models.

What is the significance of epithelial cells in diabetic foot ulcers?

Epithelial cells were identified as the key cell subpopulation spanning the entire pathological process of diabetic foot ulcers, suggesting their crucial role in wound healing and potential as therapeutic targets.

What methods were used to validate the biomarkers?

The biomarkers were validated by comparing their expression in the validation dataset GSE134431 and by immunohistochemistry and western blot in diabetic and diabetic foot ulcer rat models.

What are the clinical implications of this study?

The identified biomarkers could serve as diagnostic or prognostic indicators and potential therapeutic targets for diabetic foot ulcers, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing amputation rates.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF