🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.12307/2026.21584Original Research

Application strategies of DNA hydrogels for tissue repair

Fei Xiaoyuan¹,Xu Jiao¹,Shi Hui¹

Affiliated Wujin Hospital of Jiangsu University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China; School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Application strategies of DNA hydrogels for tissue repair
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 1907, Issue 35 • pp. 100-112Citation:Fei Xiaoyuan et al. (2026), Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research (中国组织工程研究).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • DNA hydrogels are versatile smart materials with thermal resilience, thixotropy, enzyme responsiveness, and degradability, enabling intelligent responses to environmental cues. • Multiple fabrication strategies exist, including pure DNA hydrogels via nanomodule assembly, rolling circle amplification, and hybridization chain reaction, as well as hybrid and interpenetrating network hydrogels. • DNA hydrogels show promise in tissue repair by mimicking the extracellular matrix, supporting 3D cell culture, delivering therapeutic agents, and serving as injectable scaffolds for irregular wounds and bone regeneration. • Clinical translation faces challenges such as immunogenicity concerns, high production costs, and limited scalability, necessitating further optimization and integration of bioactive molecules.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

BACKGROUND: DNA hydrogels possess thermal resilience, thixotropy, enzyme responsiveness, and degradability. Further functionalization with chemical modifications, peptides, aptamers, and other elements can endow hydrogels with unique responsiveness, demonstrating their immense potential as smart materials. OBJECTIVE: To summarize fabrication strategies, functional properties, and applications of DNA hydrogels. METHODS: PubMed and CNKI databases were searched using "DNA hydrogel, tissue engineering, tissue regeneration" as English and Chinese search terms. Based on inclusion criteria, 76 relevant articles were selected for in-depth analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Current research has established diverse preparation methods for DNA hydrogels, including: nanomodule assembly, rolling circle amplification, and hybridization chain reaction for pure DNA hydrogels; grafting DNA molecules onto polymers and adding crosslinkers to form hybrid DNA hydrogels; interpenetrating polymer networks with DNA nanomodule networks; and physical crosslinking. Modular self-assembled hydrogels often exhibit shear-thinning and self-healing capabilities, making them injectable for irregular wounds and bone regeneration with good filling capacity. DNA hydrogels can load, protect, and deliver various bioactive components. They can mimic the extracellular matrix, support 3D cell culture, and serve as delivery platforms for stem cell therapy in bone repair and neural regeneration. Additionally, DNA hydrogels enable theranostics, intelligently responding to different disease requirements. However, clinical translation faces challenges: immunogenicity remains controversial, and laboratory-scale synthesis is costly and limited. Future efforts should focus on integrating bioactive molecules to enhance therapeutic efficacy and improving cost-effectiveness.

1. Introduction

In the field of tissue engineering, research efforts are dedicated to finding suitable scaffold materials that mimic the extracellular matrix to promote the migration and growth of peripheral cells, while continuously releasing loaded therapeutic molecules to facilitate damaged tissue repair. Hydrogels are a class of three-dimensional networks formed by polymer chains through physical or chemical crosslinking, capable of absorbing and retaining large amounts of water, loading bioactive components, and filling defect sites, making them ideal scaffold materials. Currently, a wide variety of materials are used for hydrogel synthesis, including polyacrylamide [1], polyvinyl alcohol [2], polyethylene glycol [3], and polyacrylic acid [4]. However, synthetic polymers such as polyacrylamide have toxic degradation products and suboptimal biocompatibility, limiting their biomedical applications. This drawback can be mitigated by using natural materials, such as alginate [5], chitosan [6], collagen [7], dextran [8], gelatin [9], hyaluronic acid, and silk fibroin [10-11], which generally exhibit low toxicity and weak immunogenicity and have been widely developed as wound dressings and implantable scaffolds. Typically, hydrogels formed from these biopolymers have relatively simple structures, and even with chemical modification, they may not fully meet the demands for intelligent and personalized repair of various tissue injuries.

DNA hydrogels are gels formed by DNA molecules as structural units or crosslinkers, retaining the conventional properties of hydrogels while their pore structure more closely resembles the extracellular matrix, facilitating the transport and removal of nutrients and metabolic waste. DNA can form gels through non-covalent interactions, and such dynamic crosslinking allows for easier diffusion of macromolecules, proteins, and even extracellular vesicles within the gel [12-13]. Based on the inherent properties of DNA, DNA hydrogels exhibit thermal resilience, thixotropy, enzyme responsiveness, and degradability [14]. Furthermore, functional elements such as chemical modifications [15], peptides [16], and aptamers [17] can be introduced to confer specific responsiveness, demonstrating their immense potential as smart materials. DNA hydrogels have been widely studied for applications in biosensing [18-19], drug delivery [20], tissue engineering [21-22], cell capture, and 3D culture [18,23-24], as illustrated in Figure 1. This review introduces the construction methods and properties of DNA hydrogels, summarizes recent applications in tissue repair, and discusses the clinical potential of DNA hydrogels as intelligent materials.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Fei Xiaoyuan, Xu Jiao, Shi Hui (2026). Application strategies of DNA hydrogels for tissue repair. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21584
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are DNA hydrogels?

DNA hydrogels are three-dimensional hydrophilic networks formed by DNA molecules as structural units or crosslinkers. They combine the physical properties of hydrogels with the molecular programmability of DNA, allowing for dynamic network structures via base pairing, self-assembly, or chemical crosslinking. They exhibit biocompatibility, reversible responsiveness, and molecular recognition capabilities.

How are DNA hydrogels prepared?

DNA hydrogels can be prepared through several methods: pure DNA hydrogels via nanomodule assembly, rolling circle amplification, or hybridization chain reaction; hybrid DNA hydrogels by grafting DNA onto polymers and adding crosslinkers; interpenetrating networks of polymer and DNA nanomodules; or direct physical crosslinking. These methods allow tailoring of mechanical and functional properties.

What are the applications of DNA hydrogels in tissue repair?

DNA hydrogels are used in tissue repair as injectable scaffolds for irregular wounds and bone regeneration, as carriers for controlled drug delivery, as matrices for 3D cell culture and stem cell therapy in bone and neural repair, and as theranostic platforms that respond to disease-specific stimuli. They mimic the extracellular matrix and support cell growth and differentiation.

What are the challenges for clinical translation of DNA hydrogels?

Challenges include concerns about immunogenicity, as some DNA sequences may trigger inflammatory responses; high production costs and limited scalability of laboratory synthesis; and the need to integrate bioactive molecules to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Future research should focus on optimizing safety, cost-effectiveness, and functional performance.

What are the key properties of DNA hydrogels?

DNA hydrogels possess thermal resilience, thixotropy (shear-thinning), enzyme responsiveness, and degradability. They can be functionalized with chemical groups, peptides, or aptamers to achieve specific responses. These properties make them suitable for injectable applications, controlled release, and dynamic environments.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF