Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• ANT1 is overexpressed in colorectal cancer tissues and correlates with poor patient prognosis. • Knockdown of ANT1 suppresses CRC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by inhibiting PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy. • PINK1 overexpression partially rescues the cellular dysfunction caused by ANT1 knockdown, highlighting a potential therapeutic axis. • In vivo xenograft studies confirm that ANT1 knockdown significantly inhibits tumor growth, suggesting ANT1 as a promising therapeutic target for CRC.
Abstract
Mitochondrial dysfunction is closely related to tumor development. Adenine nucleotide translocator 1 (ANT1), which promotes ADP/ATP translocation across the inner mitochondrial membrane, is an important protein involved in mitochondrial function and plays a role in a variety of diseases, including cancers. However, its role in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression remains poorly understood. This study aims to explore the potential role of ANT1 in CRC and its relationship with mitophagy. Through immunohistochemical analysis, we find that ANT1 expression is significantly higher in the tumor tissues of CRC patients than in adjacent normal tissues and that its overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. Further experiments demonstrate that ANT1 knockdown significantly inhibits CRC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, increased ROS production, and apoptosis by suppressing mitophagy. Mechanistically, ANT1 knockdown downregulates the PINK1/Parkin pathway, thereby inhibiting mitophagy activity. Notably, PINK1 overexpression partially rescues the cellular dysfunction induced by ANT1 knockdown, suggesting a potential role for PINK1 in reversing the suppression of mitophagy. In vivo xenograft models also show that ANT1 knockdown markedly inhibits tumor growth. In conclusion, ANT1 may play a critical role in CRC progression by regulating mitophagy, providing a basis for its potential as a therapeutic target.
1. Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death [1,2]. Studies estimate that by the year 2040, the burden of CRC is projected to increase to 3.2 million new cases and 1.6 million deaths, with the majority of cases occurring in countries with high or very high human development indices [3–5]. Recent research has shown a steady increase in the incidence of CRC among young individuals [6,7]. Surgery is the treatment of choice in the early stages, but patients with advanced disease have lower survival rates and rely on neoadjuvant chemotherapy and targeted immunotherapies [8,9]. Currently, some progress has been made in the development of targeted drugs for the treatment of CRC, but their therapeutic effects are affected by the location and molecular characteristics of the tumor [10,11]. Therefore, more scientific and effective treatments for CRC are becoming a major challenge in our new era of precision medicine.
Mitochondria, commonly known as the cellular “powerhouse” are critical for maintaining homeostasis and supporting diverse cellular functions while also playing an important role in determining cell fate by participating in programmed cell death [12–14]. Adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT), a dual-function protein located on the inner membrane of mitochondria, regulates adenosine triphosphate (ATP)/adenosine diphosphate (ADP) exchange for metabolism and is part of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, which regulates cell death [15–19]. The ANT family consists of four subtypes, ANT1, ANT2, ANT3, and ANT4, which are encoded by four nuclear genes whose expression is tightly regulated. ANT1, encoded by the nuclear gene SLC25A4, is a heart- and muscle-specific subtype of the ANT mitochondrial inner membrane protein family [20]. Hoshino et al. [21] reported that ANT1 is essential for mitophagy, as its knockout in mice leads to reduced mitophagy and the accumulation of abnormal mitochondria.
Mitophagy is a critical mitochondrial quality control mechanism that eliminates damaged mitochondria and reduces the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [22]. Changes in mitochondrial function play pivotal roles in cancer development, as mitophagy can either support cell survival or promote cell death depending on the cellular environment, functioning as a double-edged sword in tumor cells [23]. On one hand, mitochondria are crucial for energy production in eukaryotic cells, and their maintenance is essential for cell survival [24]. Mitophagy helps alleviate stress by clearing dysfunctional mitochondria [25]. On the other hand, mitophagy suppresses tumor growth by removing defective mitochondria, which might otherwise transform cells and contribute to tumorigenesis [26].
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Jin Ji, Mingrui Jiang, Shantanu Baral, Qiannan Sun, Dong Tang, Wei Wang, Jun Ren, Daorong Wang (2026). ANT1 suppression inhibits the progression of colorectal cancer by suppressing PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2025154
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the role of ANT1 in colorectal cancer progression?
ANT1 is overexpressed in colorectal cancer tissues and is associated with poor prognosis. Its knockdown inhibits cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, and suppresses tumor growth in vivo, indicating that ANT1 promotes CRC progression.
How does ANT1 affect mitophagy in colorectal cancer cells?
ANT1 knockdown downregulates the PINK1/Parkin pathway, thereby inhibiting mitophagy. This leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, increased ROS production, and apoptosis, which contribute to the suppression of cancer cell growth.
Can PINK1 overexpression reverse the effects of ANT1 knockdown?
Yes, PINK1 overexpression partially rescues the cellular dysfunction induced by ANT1 knockdown, suggesting that PINK1 can reverse the suppression of mitophagy and may be a potential therapeutic target.
What is the clinical significance of this study?
The study provides evidence that ANT1 could serve as a novel therapeutic target for colorectal cancer. Targeting ANT1 to modulate mitophagy may offer a new strategy for CRC treatment, especially for patients with high ANT1 expression.
What methods were used to assess ANT1 expression and its effects?
The study used immunohistochemistry to assess ANT1 expression in patient tissues, and cell-based assays (proliferation, migration, invasion) and in vivo xenograft models to evaluate the effects of ANT1 knockdown. Mechanistic studies focused on the PINK1/Parkin pathway.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.