Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Plant annexins are multifunctional proteins that bind calcium and phospholipids, playing central roles in growth and stress signaling. • They exhibit both calcium-dependent and calcium-independent membrane binding, and can function as peroxidases, cation channels, and ATP/GTP hydrolases. • Annexin gene families have been identified in nearly 30 plant species, with precise regulation of expression and localization by developmental and environmental cues. • This review highlights the core roles of plant annexins in growth and adaptation, providing a foundation for future research and potential agricultural applications.
Abstract
Annexins are a family of multifunctional calcium-dependent and phospholipid-binding proteins that are widely distributed in the plant kingdom. They have a highly conserved evolutionary history that dates back to single-celled protists. Plant annexins, as soluble proteins, can flexibly bind to endomembranes and plasma membranes, exhibiting unique calcium-dependent and calcium-independent characteristics. Members of the annexin family have diverse functions, including binding to F-actin, participating in ATP and GTP hydrolysis, and even serving as peroxidases or cation channels. Annexins play pivotal roles in plant growth and stress signaling. They can respond sensitively to environmental, metabolic, and developmental signals, thereby affecting cytoskeleton remodeling and exocytosis mechanisms. Plant annexin gene families have been successfully identified in multiple species, and their expression and intracellular localization are precisely regulated by developmental processes and environmental factors. Although research on plant annexins has aroused great interest, their depth and breadth still need further expansion compared with those of animal annexins. This article provides a comprehensive and in-depth review of the characteristics and functions of plant annexin families, revealing their core roles in plant growth and adaptation, and yielding valuable references and insights for future research.
1. Introduction
Annexins are a multifunctional and evolutionarily conserved multigene family of Ca2+-dependent and phospholipid-binding proteins [1–3]. They are a group of primitive proteins that date back to approximately 1 to 1.5 billion years ago in the unicellular protist Giardia lamblia [4]. These proteins are widely distributed in plants, animals, and microorganisms [2,5,6]. Plant annexins were first discovered in tomatoes by Boustead et al. [7] in 1989, but research interest in plant annexins has increased. In contrast, animal annexins have been extensively studied. Animal annexins are involved in signal transduction, free cytosolic Ca2+ homeostasis, exocytosis and endocytosis, membrane organization, cytoskeletal dynamics, cell cycle control, and water permeability [8,9].
Plants can sense and respond to a range of environmental, metabolic, and developmental signals. The operation and control of interacting signal transduction pathways involve cells, endomembranes, and a range of integrated, peripheral, and soluble proteins. The downstream responses may require remodeling of the cytoskeleton and changes in the exocytosis mechanism and cell wall [1]. Plant annexins appear to function at all of these levels [8]. Research has shown that plant annexins, as ubiquitous soluble proteins, can bind to endomembranes and the plasma membrane with both calcium-dependent and calcium-independent properties. Some members of this multigene family can bind to F-actin, hydrolyze GTP and ATP, and act as peroxidases or cation channels [10–15]. Plant annexins seem to be at the center of signal transduction and adaptation, playing a role as core regulators or effectors in plant growth and stress signaling. Plant annexins can not only regulate cell activities such as cell division and tissue and organ development but also regulate abiotic stress (such as salt and drought stresses) and biotic stress processes caused by pathogens [3,16–18].
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Chen Xie, Mingyue Zhu, Ruirui Shi, Liu Yang, Xiaoya An, Chao Wang (2026). Annexins: central regulators of plant growth and stress signaling. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2024228
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are plant annexins?
Plant annexins are a family of multifunctional calcium-dependent and phospholipid-binding proteins that are widely distributed in plants. They play key roles in growth and stress signaling.
What functions do plant annexins have?
Plant annexins can bind to F-actin, hydrolyze ATP and GTP, act as peroxidases or cation channels, and are involved in membrane organization, cytoskeletal dynamics, and exocytosis.
How do plant annexins respond to stress?
Plant annexins respond sensitively to environmental, metabolic, and developmental signals, and regulate both abiotic stress (e.g., salt, drought) and biotic stress caused by pathogens.
In which plant species have annexin gene families been identified?
Annexin gene families have been identified in nearly 30 plant species, including Arabidopsis, rice, poplar, and rye, among others.
What is the significance of this review?
This review provides a comprehensive overview of plant annexin characteristics and functions, highlighting their central roles in plant growth and adaptation, and offering insights for future research.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.