Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Advanced age, normal sensory function, higher Barthel index, and Fugl-Meyer motor function score are protective factors against severe spasticity in stroke hemiplegic patients. • Depression/anxiety, poor sleep quality, and pain are significant risk factors for increased spasticity severity. • A logistic regression model incorporating these factors achieved an AUC of 0.969, demonstrating high predictive accuracy for spasticity severity. • Multidimensional and individualized interventions are recommended to prevent and reduce spasticity, improving functional outcomes and quality of life.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spastic hemiplegia remains a challenging clinical problem that urgently needs to be addressed. Currently, most research primarily focuses on discussing the influencing factors of spasticity onset. This study, however, utilizes binary logistic regression to primarily explore the key factors affecting the severity of spasticity in stroke patients, providing a reliable basis for personalized treatment plans for patients. OBJECTIVE: To identify the influencing factors of spasticity severity in stroke patients with hemiplegia through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and to construct a risk prediction model. METHODS: A total of 120 patients with post-stroke spasticity hospitalized at the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from November 2024 to March 2025 were enrolled. A self-designed questionnaire was used for data collection. Logistic regression analysis was performed to screen the influencing factors of spasticity severity in hemiplegic patients, and a risk prediction model was constructed. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated via a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Among 120 stroke spasticity patients, 66 had mild spasticity with Modified Ashworth Scale < 2 and 54 had severe spasticity with Modified Ashworth Scale ≥ 2. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that for stroke spasticity patients, advanced age, normal sensory function, higher Barthel index, and Fugl-Meyer motor function score were protective factors for spasticity severity; while depression and anxiety, poor sleep quality, and pain were risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the logistic regression model for spasticity severity in stroke hemiplegic patients was 0.969 [95%CI (0.944, 0.994)], indicating that the prediction model based on these factors has high predictive efficacy. Clinicians should adopt multidimensional and individualized intervention strategies to actively prevent and reduce spasticity, thereby improving functional prognosis and quality of life.
1. Introduction
Spastic hemiplegia is one of the most common motor disorders after stroke [1], and its epidemiological characteristics and clinical impact have attracted much attention. The incidence of post-stroke spasticity can reach 40% [2], among which severe spasticity accounts for 10.3% and disability rate reaches 9.4% [3]. Patients mainly present with motor dysfunction such as increased muscle tone, joint contracture, and limited mobility. These symptoms not only cause limb pain and postural abnormalities but also seriously affect the functional recovery process and significantly reduce quality of life [4].
From a pathophysiological perspective, post-stroke spasticity is a complex neurological dysfunction phenomenon, and its mechanism has not been fully elucidated. Currently, most scholars believe that the occurrence of spasticity is mainly related to increased excitability of the stretch reflex, characterized by velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone accompanied by hyperreflexia [5]. This change is mainly due to the weakening of descending inhibition caused by upper motor neuron injury, leading to dysfunction of limb movement and sensory regulation [6]. At the molecular level, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is an important inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. A decrease in GABA content reduces its inhibitory effect on the central nervous system, leading to abnormally increased spinal excitability [7], which is closely related to the occurrence of spasticity. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a protein that promotes nerve growth activity and plays an important role in the growth and development of the central nervous system. After stroke, the decreased activity of GABA-A receptors prevents normal depolarization of neurons, affecting the release of BDNF and reducing the binding of BDNF to presynaptic tyrosine kinase B receptors, thereby further inhibiting the synthesis and release of GABA and aggravating spasticity [8-9]. However, because the pathogenesis of spasticity involves multiple neural pathways and molecular changes, and the clinical manifestations and severity are affected by various factors such as lesion location, degree of injury, and rehabilitation timing, ideal therapeutic effects have not been achieved. Currently, domestic research on factors influencing the severity of post-stroke spasticity is relatively scarce. Huang Sai'e et al. [10] mainly discussed risk factors for the occurrence of muscle spasticity, but did not involve clinical scale assessment and model prediction, lacking more comprehensive and objective evidence.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Cao Xinyan, Leng Xiaoxuan, Gao Shiai, Chen Jinhui, Liu Xihua (2026). Analysis of influencing factors and risk prediction model for spasticity severity in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.12307/2026.21273
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main protective factors against severe spasticity in stroke hemiplegic patients?
The study found that advanced age, normal sensory function, higher Barthel index, and Fugl-Meyer motor function score are protective factors against severe spasticity.
Which factors increase the risk of severe spasticity after stroke?
Depression and anxiety, poor sleep quality, and pain were identified as significant risk factors for increased spasticity severity.
How accurate is the risk prediction model for spasticity severity?
The logistic regression model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.969 (95% CI: 0.944-0.994), indicating high predictive accuracy.
What is the clinical significance of this study?
The findings support the use of multidimensional and individualized interventions to prevent and reduce spasticity, thereby improving functional outcomes and quality of life in stroke patients.
How was the study conducted?
A total of 120 post-stroke spasticity patients were enrolled. Data were collected via a self-designed questionnaire, and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify influencing factors and construct a prediction model.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.