Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• UHRF1 is upregulated in breast cancer tissues and cell lines, and its knockdown suppresses proliferation and invasion while inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. • UHRF1 epigenetically silences ZBTB16 via DNMT1-mediated promoter methylation, revealing a novel regulatory axis. • The ZBTB16/ANXA7/Cyclin B1 axis mediates the tumor-suppressive effects of UHRF1 knockdown, providing potential therapeutic targets. • In vivo xenograft studies confirm that UHRF1 knockdown reduces tumor growth, supporting its clinical relevance.
Abstract
Ubiquitin-like containing PHD and RING finger domains 1 (UHRF1) is involved in tumorigenicity through DNA methylation in various cancers, including breast cancer. This study aims to investigate the regulatory mechanisms of UHRF1 in breast cancer progression. Herein, we show that UHRF1 is upregulated in breast cancer tissues and cell lines as measured by western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. Breast cancer cells are transfected with a UHRF1 overexpression plasmid (pcDNA-UHRF1) or short hairpin RNA targeting UHRF1 (sh-UHRF1), followed by detection of cell proliferation, invasion, apoptosis, and cell cycle. UHRF1 overexpression promotes proliferation and invasion and attenuates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in breast cancer cells, while UHRF1 knockdown shows the opposite effect. Moreover, methylation-specific PCR and ChIP assays indicate that UHRF1 inhibits zinc finger and BTB domain containing 16 (ZBTB16) expression by promoting ZBTB16 promoter methylation via the recruitment of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). Then, a co-IP assay is used to verify the interaction between ZBTB16 and the annexin A7 (ANXA7) protein. ZBTB16 promotes ANXA7 expression and subsequently inhibits Cyclin B1 expression. Rescue experiments reveal that ZBTB16 knockdown reverses the inhibitory effects of UHRF1 knockdown on breast cancer cell malignancies and that ANXA7 knockdown abolishes the inhibitory effects of ZBTB16 overexpression on breast cancer cell malignancies. Additionally, UHRF1 knockdown significantly inhibits xenograft tumor growth in vivo. In conclusion, UHRF1 knockdown inhibits proliferation and invasion, induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in breast cancer cells via the ZBTB16/ANXA7/Cyclin B1 axis, and reduces xenograft tumor growth in vivo.
1. Introduction
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death among women [1]. Currently, clinical therapeutic strategies include surgical resection, chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and targeted biotherapy [2]. Although significant improvements have rapidly been made in the management of breast cancer, the outcomes remain seriously unsatisfactory owing to the increasing incidence rate and tumor recurrence and metastasis [3]. Thus, there is an urgent need to clarify the molecular mechanism of breast cancer progression and formulate more effective clinical treatment strategies.
Ubiquitin-like containing PHD and RING finger domains 1 (UHRF1), also known as ICBP90 in humans and Np95 in mice, has been identified as a multidomain protein. It has been reported that UHRF1 is upregulated in multiple cancers, and its dysregulation is associated with proliferation, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in cancer cells. For instance, UHRF1 is elevated in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and knockdown of UHRF1 attenuates cSCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, leading to G2/M cell cycle arrest and increased apoptosis [4]. UHRF1 expression is upregulated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while knockdown of UHRF1 inhibits proliferation and metastasis and induces G2/M cell cycle arrest in HCC cells [5]. UHRF1 has also been identified as an important epigenetic factor that regulates DNA methylation. The SET and RING-associated (SRA) domain of UHRF1 has been proven to be required for the maintenance of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1)-mediated DNA methylation [6]. Accumulating evidence indicates that UHRF1 is involved in tumorigenicity by promoting DNA promoter methylation and subsequently silencing tumor suppressor genes. It was found that UHRF1 induces DNMT1-mediated promoter methylation and subsequently downregulates the expressions of tumor suppressor genes, thus inhibiting cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in cervical cancer [7]. UHRF1 facilitates gastric cancer proliferation and growth in vitro and in vivo by mediating hypermethylation of several tumor suppressor genes [8]. Notably, it was previously reported that UHRF1 promotes the proliferation, invasion and migration of breast cancer cells [9]. Moreover, short hairpin RNA (shRNA) lentiviral system-mediated UHRF1 knockdown inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation [10], indicating that UHRF1 may serve as a promising therapeutic target for breast cancer. However, the regulatory mechanisms of UHRF1 in breast cancer progression have not been fully characterized.
Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 16 (ZBTB16), also known as promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) or zinc finger protein 145 (ZFP145), is a member of the zinc finger and BTB/POZ domain-containing family of proteins (ZBTBs). Recent studies have shown that ZBTB16 participates in various major biological processes, such as hematopoiesis, spermatogenesis, stem cell maintenance, tumor suppression and immune regulation [11,12]. Downregulation of ZBTB16 has been detected in various cancers and malignant cell lines. ZBTB16 is significantly downregulated in HCC [13].
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Di Liu, Qin Du, Yuxuan Zhu, Yize Guo, Ya Guo (2026). UHRF1 knockdown induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in breast cancer cells through the ZBTB16/ANXA7/Cyclin B1 axis. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2024148
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the role of UHRF1 in breast cancer?
UHRF1 is upregulated in breast cancer and promotes proliferation and invasion while inhibiting cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Its knockdown suppresses tumor growth, making it a potential therapeutic target.
How does UHRF1 regulate ZBTB16 expression?
UHRF1 recruits DNMT1 to the ZBTB16 promoter, leading to DNA methylation and transcriptional silencing of ZBTB16.
What is the ZBTB16/ANXA7/Cyclin B1 axis?
ZBTB16 promotes ANXA7 expression, which in turn inhibits Cyclin B1, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. This axis mediates the effects of UHRF1 knockdown in breast cancer cells.
Does UHRF1 knockdown affect tumor growth in vivo?
Yes, UHRF1 knockdown significantly inhibits xenograft tumor growth in vivo, confirming its oncogenic role in breast cancer.
What are the clinical implications of this study?
Targeting UHRF1 or the ZBTB16/ANXA7/Cyclin B1 axis could provide novel therapeutic strategies for breast cancer treatment.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.