Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• SRC and TOPK are overexpressed and positively correlated in LUSC, correlating with poor patient survival. • A positive feedback loop between SRC and TOPK promotes LUSC tumorigenicity by phosphorylating RB1 and inhibiting its tumor suppressor function. • Targeting SRC and TOPK synergistically induces apoptosis in LUSC cells and shows efficacy in vivo, suggesting a novel therapeutic strategy. • This study identifies the SRC-TOPK-RB1 axis as a promising precise therapeutic target for LUSC, addressing the current lack of targeted therapies.
Abstract
Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is a common subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, with limited treatment options and poor patient prognosis. Currently, common driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma rarely occur in LUSC; the mutated genes found in LUSCs lack corresponding targeted drugs. Therefore, it is necessary to discover new therapeutic targets for LUSC and provide patients with more treatment options. By analyzing different databases and tissue microarray immunohistochemistry staining, we firstly find that the expression of SRC/TOPK is elevated and positively correlated in LUSC and that patients with high SRC/TOPK expression have shorter survival time. Changing the expression levels of SRC/TOPK in LUSC cells can affect cell growth and colony formation, as there is a positive feedback loop between SRC and TOPK that regulates the transcription factor RB1, thereby altering the expressions of key factors in some growth-related signaling pathways. These inhibitors can synergistically promote apoptosis and have been validated in vivo. Therefore, the positive feedback loop between SRC and TOPK promotes tumorigenicity by inhibiting RB1 function, and has the potential to become a precise therapeutic target for LUSC, providing new possibilities for targeted therapy.
1. Introduction
Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is a type of non-small cell lung cancer, which accounts for approximately 20%–30% of lung cancer cases [1]. At present, surgery, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are still the main treatments for LUSC patients. The treatment methods are relatively limited, and resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy often occurs; immunotherapy is also prone to adverse reactions or failure [2]. With the emergence of targeted drugs, the therapeutic effect on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) has improved, and the survival period of patients is continuously prolonged. However, unlike LUAD patients, LUSC patients have not yet benefited from targeted therapy. Common driver mutations in LUAD, such as those in EGFR and KRAS, rarely occur in LUSC. The mutation sites discovered in LUSC, such as those in SOX2, FGFR1, and NSD3, have not yet been successfully identified as targeted drugs [3]. Therefore, new LUSC therapeutic targets still need to be identified.
SRC is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase protein that is commonly expressed in normal tissues. SRC has been identified as an important oncoprotein that can promote cancer progression, invasion, metastasis and drug resistance in various cancers, including colorectal cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and gastric cancer [4–6]. SRC has been studied in NSCLC, especially LUAD. Onodera et al. [7] demonstrated that the simultaneous inhibition of SRC and Rho/ROCK had a synergistic effect on the growth of NSCLC cells. SRC interacts with cell surface growth factor receptors and intracellular signaling pathways to maintain cell survival in NSCLC [4]. However, there is still a lack of evidence to determine whether SRC is involved in the occurrence and development of LUSC.
T-LAK cell-derived protein kinase (TOPK), also known as PDZ binding kinase (PBK), is a serine threonine protein kinase belonging to the MAPK kinase family. TOPK is involved in inflammatory reactions and is also a procancer factor. Overexpression of TOPK is a poor prognostic factor in LUAD patients and is closely associated with P53 mutations [8,9]. KRASG12C mutation-induced TOPK overexpression promotes NSCLC tumor progression, mediating hypoxia-induced epithelial mesenchymal transition and NSCLC cell invasion through the HIF-1 α/snail axis [10,11]. In addition, our previous research revealed that TOPK promoted lung cancer resistance to EGFR inhibitors by phosphorylating c-Jun and that inhibiting the COX2/MET/TOPK signaling axis weakened NSCLC cell resistance to EGFR inhibitors [12,13].
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Xiaofei Zeng, Longzhen Cui, Beibei Tang, Fei Wang, Hua He, Feng Zhu, Minjie Ma, Chang Chen (2026). The SRC-TOPK positive feedback loop promotes RB1 phosphorylation and drives the development of lung squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2025149
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the role of SRC and TOPK in lung squamous cell carcinoma?
The study found that SRC and TOPK are overexpressed and positively correlated in LUSC, and their high expression is associated with shorter patient survival. They form a positive feedback loop that promotes tumorigenicity by phosphorylating RB1 and inhibiting its function.
How does the SRC-TOPK feedback loop affect RB1?
The positive feedback loop between SRC and TOPK regulates the transcription factor RB1, leading to its phosphorylation and functional inhibition, which in turn alters the expression of key factors in growth-related signaling pathways.
What is the potential therapeutic implication of this study?
The study suggests that targeting the SRC-TOPK positive feedback loop could be a precise therapeutic strategy for LUSC. Inhibitors of SRC and TOPK synergistically promote apoptosis and have been validated in vivo, offering new possibilities for targeted therapy.
Why is there a need for new therapeutic targets in LUSC?
LUSC patients have limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Unlike lung adenocarcinoma, common driver mutations in LUSC lack corresponding targeted drugs, so identifying new therapeutic targets is essential.
What methods were used to validate the findings?
The researchers analyzed databases and tissue microarray immunohistochemistry staining to assess SRC/TOPK expression. They also altered SRC/TOPK levels in LUSC cells to study effects on growth and colony formation, and validated the synergistic effect of inhibitors in vivo.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.