Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• USP2 is identified as a novel deubiquitinase for PML-RARα, regulating its stability. • Inhibition of USP2 with ML364 or silencing induces degradation of PML-RARα, including drug-resistant mutants. • USP2 inhibition triggers apoptosis in APL cell lines and primary leukemia cells. • Targeting USP2 represents a promising therapeutic strategy for APL, especially with PML-RARα mutations.
Abstract
Despite the high efficacy of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) in treating acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), approximately 10%–20% of patients develop drug resistance due to mutations in PML-RARα and other factors. Here, we find that inhibition of USP2 with ML364 or USP2 silencing reduces PML-RARα protein levels in both ATRA-sensitive and ATRA-resistant APL cells, and this effect is reversed by proteasome inhibition. Conversely, USP2 overexpression enhances PML-RARα stability. Mechanistically, USP2 interacts with and deubiquitinates PML-RARα, including its drug-resistant mutants. Consistent with PML-RARα degradation, ML364 treatment significantly induces apoptosis in APL cell lines and primary leukemia cells. In conclusion, this study identifies USP2 as a novel deubiquitinating enzyme for PML-RARα and highlights USP2 inhibition as a potential therapeutic strategy for APL with PML-RARα mutations.
1. Introduction
PML-RARα is generated by the t(15;17)(q24;q21) chromosomal translocation [1]. The resulting oncoprotein blocks cell differentiation and suppresses apoptosis, ultimately leading to the development of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) [2,3]. The introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) has significantly improved the overall survival of APL patients [1,4,5]. However, approximately 10%–20% of APL patients develop resistance to treatment with ATRA and/or ATO [6]. Among the known resistance mechanisms, the most prevalent one involve mutations in the PML-RARα fusion gene, particularly in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of RARα and the PML-B2 domain, the primary target site of ATO [7–9]. Mutations in the PML-B2 domain (e.g., A216V and L218P) may impair ATO therapeutic efficacy by disrupting proper ATO binding, interfering with post-translational modifications (such as SUMOylation and multimerization), and causing aberrant subcellular localization [10–12]. These defects collectively lead to insufficient degradation and pathological retention of oncoproteins, ultimately sustaining their stability and driving therapeutic resistance by evading ATO-mediated clearance mechanisms. When mutations occur in the LBD of RARα, conformational changes can weaken its binding affinity to ATRA. Owing to this reduced binding capacity, the LBD may fail to properly dissociate nuclear receptor corepressor complexes and recruit activator complexes, leading to aberrant transcriptional regulation and subsequent ATRA resistance [13–15]. One promising strategy to overcome this mutation-induced drug resistance is to induce protein degradation via alternative pathways. For example, targeting HDAC3 has been shown to induce the degradation of PML-RARα in ATRA- and ATO-resistant APLs [16].
Deubiquitinases (DUBs) regulate protein stability and function by removing ubiquitin chains from substrate proteins, modifying ubiquitin linkages, and processing ubiquitin precursors [17]. The stability of PML-RARα can also be influenced by DUB activity, suggesting that inhibiting specific DUBs may induce PML-RARα degradation and overcome ATRA- and ATO-resistance in patients with PML-RARα mutations. For example, the inhibition of YOD1, a member of the ovarian tumor protease (OTU) family, has been shown to promote PML-RARα degradation and effectively eliminate APL cells, including drug-resistant subtypes [18]. This work suggests that DUB inhibition is a potential therapeutic strategy for degrading PML-RARα.
In the present study, we identified USP2 as a novel DUB for PML-RARα. USP2 knockdown or the use of the USP2 inhibitor ML364 induced the degradation of PML-RARα and the apoptosis of APL cells. Importantly, inhibition of USP2 could also degrade drug-resistant PML-RARα mutants. Our study demonstrated that USP2 is a novel target for the treatment of APL, particularly in patients with drug-resistant APL driven by PML-RARα mutations.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Jie Zhang, Wenxuan Wu, Yun Wang, Youping Zhang, Yingying Wang, Wenhui Bai, Zhenge Zhang, Chujiao Zhu, Yunzhao Wu, Ziwei Zhang, Li Yang, Hu Lei, Hanzhang Xu, Li Zhou, Yingli Wu (2026). Targeting USP2 induces degradation of PML-RARα with or without drug-resistant mutations in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2025135
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the role of USP2 in acute promyelocytic leukemia?
USP2 is a deubiquitinase that stabilizes PML-RARα by removing ubiquitin chains. Inhibition of USP2 leads to degradation of PML-RARα, including drug-resistant mutants, and induces apoptosis in APL cells.
How does ML364 affect PML-RARα?
ML364 is a USP2 inhibitor that reduces PML-RARα protein levels in both ATRA-sensitive and ATRA-resistant APL cells, leading to apoptosis. This effect is reversed by proteasome inhibition, indicating proteasomal degradation.
Can USP2 inhibition overcome drug resistance in APL?
Yes, USP2 inhibition degrades PML-RARα mutants that confer resistance to ATRA and ATO, suggesting a potential therapeutic strategy for drug-resistant APL.
What is the significance of this study for APL treatment?
The study identifies USP2 as a novel therapeutic target for APL, especially for patients with PML-RARα mutations who are resistant to conventional therapies, offering a new approach to induce oncoprotein degradation.
What methods were used to study USP2's effect?
The researchers used USP2 silencing (siRNA) and the inhibitor ML364 in APL cell lines and primary cells, along with co-immunoprecipitation and ubiquitination assays to demonstrate interaction and deubiquitination of PML-RARα.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.