🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.3724/abbs.2025240Original Research

PD-1 blockade elicits a systemic immune response but not in the tumor of TNBC mice

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: PD-1 blockade elicits a systemic immune response but not in the tumor of TNBC mice

Xiaodan Hong¹,Mei Ma¹,Hongmei Cui¹,Xiaojuan Yang¹,Feifei Li¹,Meiling Chu¹,Yiyi Ye¹,Ziwei Jiang¹,Lixia Pei¹,Sheng Liu¹,Ying Xie¹

Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
PD-1 blockade elicits a systemic immune response but not in the tumor of TNBC mice
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 68, Issue 12 • pp. 100-112Citation:Xiaodan Hong et al. (2026), Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica (生物化学与生物物理学报).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • PD-1 blockade has limited efficacy in reducing tumor burden and altering tumor-infiltrating immune cells in TNBC mice. • Systemic immune activity is enhanced by PD-1 blockade, with increased T cells and dendritic cells in peripheral blood, potentially linked to inflammatory side effects. • PD-1 blockade does not rescue hematopoietic damage induced by TNBC, indicating a limitation for long-term response. • In tumor-free mice, PD-1 blockade increases hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, suggesting potential benefits after tumor resection.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options due to the absence of hormone receptors and HER2 amplification. Immune checkpoint blockade, particularly targeting PD-1/PD-L1, has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy. However, the response rate of TNBC patients to this monotherapy remains low. This study explores the systemic effect of PD-1 blockade on the immune and hematopoietic systems in 4T1 TNBC mice and demonstrates its limited efficacy in reducing the tumor burden and changing the number of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. However, PD-1 blockade increases systemic immune activity, as demonstrated by increased T cells and DCs in the peripheral blood, which may be associated with inflammatory side effects of this treatment. In addition, PD-1 blockade does not rescue the hematopoietic damage caused by TNBC, highlighting a limitation in long-term response. Furthermore, PD-1 blockade in tumor-free mice leads to an increase in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, suggesting that PD-1 blockade may yield better benefits post-tumor resection.

1. Introduction

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a breast cancer (BC) subtype characterized by high recurrence and mortality rates [1]. TNBC patients rarely benefit from targeted therapies because of the absence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification and estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expressions. Therefore, chemotherapy remains the primary adjuvant therapy for TNBC, despite the development of drug resistance leading to disease relapse and metastasis [2,3]. Immune checkpoint blockade, particularly targeting PD-1 (programmed cell death protein-1)/PD-L1 (programmed cell death ligand-1), has emerged as a promising treatment for TNBC.

PD-1 is an essential immune checkpoint receptor that, when bound to the ligand PD-L1, hinders T-cell activation. Tumor cells express PD-L1 to evade immune surveillance and suppress T-cell function [4]. TNBC, characterized by high levels of PD-L1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), is a promising candidate for PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy [5–7]. However, the response rate of TNBC patients to monotherapy is limited, promoting research into combination therapies to improve treatment efficacy [8–11]. Studies on immune checkpoint blockade have focused on the tumor microenvironment (TME), where immune cells play a crucial role in treatment effectiveness [12]. Immunosuppressive cells such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and T regulatory (Treg) cells support tumor growth, whereas cytotoxic T cells and natural killer (NK) cells work to eliminate tumor cells [13,14]. Dendritic cells (DCs), T helper cells, and B cells assist or regulate antitumor immunity [15].

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Xiaodan Hong, Mei Ma, Hongmei Cui, Xiaojuan Yang, Feifei Li, Meiling Chu, Yiyi Ye, Ziwei Jiang, Lixia Pei, Sheng Liu, Ying Xie (2026). PD-1 blockade elicits a systemic immune response but not in the tumor of TNBC mice. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2025240
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main finding of this study on PD-1 blockade in TNBC mice?

The study found that PD-1 blockade elicits a systemic immune response but has limited efficacy in reducing tumor burden and altering tumor-infiltrating immune cells in TNBC mice.

How does PD-1 blockade affect the systemic immune system?

PD-1 blockade increases systemic immune activity, as shown by increased T cells and dendritic cells in peripheral blood, which may be associated with inflammatory side effects.

Does PD-1 blockade rescue hematopoietic damage in TNBC?

No, PD-1 blockade does not rescue the hematopoietic damage caused by TNBC, indicating a limitation in long-term response.

What effect does PD-1 blockade have in tumor-free mice?

In tumor-free mice, PD-1 blockade increases hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, suggesting potential benefits after tumor resection.

What are the implications of this study for TNBC treatment?

The findings suggest that PD-1 blockade may be more beneficial when combined with other therapies or administered after tumor resection, and highlight the need to consider systemic immune effects and hematopoietic recovery.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF