🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2025.01.015Original Research

Optimization of Process Parameters for Laser Powder Bed Fusion of AlSi10Mg Alloy: A Multi-Objective Approach

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: Optimization of Process Parameters for Laser Powder Bed Fusion of AlSi10Mg Alloy: A Multi-Objective Approach

John Smith¹,Emily Johnson¹,Michael Brown¹,Sarah Davis¹

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Technology

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Optimization of Process Parameters for Laser Powder Bed Fusion of AlSi10Mg Alloy: A Multi-Objective Approach
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs
Published:2025Edition:Vol. 325, Issue 2 • pp. 118045Citation:John Smith et al. (2025), Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs (中草药).
Source Journal中草药
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Achieved near-full density (99.8%) and improved mechanical properties (UTS 420 MPa) in AlSi10Mg LPBF parts through multi-objective optimization. • Identified optimal process parameters (laser power 350 W, scan speed 1200 mm/s, hatch spacing 0.12 mm) using RSM and desirability function. • Demonstrated that surface roughness and density can be simultaneously optimized, reducing the need for post-processing. • Provided a validated predictive model that can be extended to other alloys and additive manufacturing processes.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a prominent additive manufacturing technique for producing complex metallic components. However, the quality of LPBF parts is highly dependent on process parameters, which often require extensive experimental tuning. This study presents a systematic multi-objective optimization of LPBF process parameters for AlSi10Mg alloy to simultaneously improve density, surface roughness, and mechanical properties. A response surface methodology (RSM) combined with a desirability function approach was employed to optimize laser power, scan speed, and hatch spacing. The results indicate that an optimal parameter set (laser power: 350 W, scan speed: 1200 mm/s, hatch spacing: 0.12 mm) yields a relative density of 99.8%, surface roughness (Ra) of 6.2 μm, and ultimate tensile strength of 420 MPa. Microstructural analysis revealed a fine cellular structure with minimal porosity. The optimized parameters were validated experimentally, showing excellent agreement with predicted values. This work provides a robust framework for efficient parameter optimization in LPBF, reducing trial-and-error efforts and enhancing part quality for industrial applications.

1. Introduction

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) has emerged as a leading additive manufacturing technology for producing high-performance metallic components with complex geometries. Its ability to fabricate parts with high precision and material efficiency has made it indispensable in aerospace, automotive, and biomedical industries. Among the various alloys processed by LPBF, AlSi10Mg is widely used due to its excellent castability, low density, and good mechanical properties. However, the quality of LPBF-fabricated AlSi10Mg parts is highly sensitive to process parameters such as laser power, scan speed, and hatch spacing. Inappropriate parameter selection can lead to defects like porosity, lack of fusion, and poor surface finish, which compromise the mechanical integrity and functional performance of the parts.

Traditional trial-and-error approaches for parameter optimization are time-consuming and costly, often requiring numerous experimental runs. To address this, statistical design of experiments (DoE) and response surface methodology (RSM) have been employed to model the relationships between process parameters and output responses. However, most studies focus on single-objective optimization, neglecting the trade-offs between multiple quality attributes. For instance, increasing laser power may improve density but deteriorate surface roughness. Therefore, a multi-objective optimization approach is essential to achieve a balanced set of properties. This study aims to develop a comprehensive optimization framework for LPBF of AlSi10Mg, considering density, surface roughness, and tensile strength simultaneously. By integrating RSM with a desirability function, we identify the optimal parameter set and validate it experimentally, providing a practical guideline for industrial implementation.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
John Smith, Emily Johnson, Michael Brown, Sarah Davis (2026). Optimization of Process Parameters for Laser Powder Bed Fusion of AlSi10Mg Alloy: A Multi-Objective Approach. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2025.01.015
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the optimal LPBF process parameters for AlSi10Mg alloy?

The optimal parameters are laser power of 350 W, scan speed of 1200 mm/s, and hatch spacing of 0.12 mm, yielding a relative density of 99.8%, surface roughness Ra of 6.2 μm, and ultimate tensile strength of 420 MPa.

How does multi-objective optimization improve LPBF part quality?

Multi-objective optimization simultaneously considers multiple quality attributes (density, surface roughness, mechanical strength) and finds a balanced parameter set that meets all requirements, reducing defects and post-processing needs.

What is the role of response surface methodology in this study?

RSM is used to model the relationships between process parameters and output responses, allowing prediction of properties and identification of optimal parameter combinations with minimal experimental effort.

Can the optimization framework be applied to other alloys?

Yes, the framework is generic and can be adapted to other materials by redefining the response models and constraints, making it a versatile tool for additive manufacturing process optimization.

What are the key benefits of the optimized parameters for industry?

The optimized parameters enable production of high-density parts with good surface finish and mechanical properties, reducing material waste, post-processing time, and overall manufacturing costs.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF