Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• PDGFRβ kinase activity is regulated by multiple allosteric mechanisms, including dimerization of activated kinases, autoinhibition by the kinase insert, and dimerization of inactive kinase. • These allosteric regulatory mechanisms are conserved across type III receptor tyrosine kinases, including CSF1R. • Impaired allosteric regulation of CSF1R is linked to microglial dysfunction and neuronal demyelination in hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids (HDLS). • The findings provide a comprehensive framework for understanding the precise regulation of PDGFRβ and related receptors, with implications for therapeutic targeting.
Abstract
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ), a type III receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) with a featured kinase insert, regulates important cellular functions. Dysregulation of PDGFRβ is associated with cardiovascular and fibrosis diseases. Thus, its kinase activity needs to be precisely regulated under physiological conditions. Early studies demonstrated that its kinase is autoinhibited by its juxtamembrane segment and activated by transphosphorylation. However, additional mechanisms are required for the comprehensive regulation of the receptor kinase. Herein, we provide evidence that dimerization of activated kinases, autoinhibition by the kinase insert, and dimerization of inactive kinase, all contribute to the regulation of the receptor kinase. Moreover, we find such multiple allosteric regulation is also conserved in other type III RTKs, including colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R). Impaired allosteric regulation of CSF1R is associated with malfunctions of microglia and demyelination of neurons in hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids (HDLS).
1. Introduction
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα) and PDGFRβ, together with colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R), mast/stem cell growth factor receptor (SCFR or c-Kit), and Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt-3) receptors, belong to the type III receptor tyrosine kinase subfamily [1–5]. All of them are composed of 5 extracellular Ig-like domains, a single-pass transmembrane domain (TM), an intracellular juxtamembrane segment (JM), a kinase domain splatted apart by a not-well characterized insert (KI), and a C-terminal tail bearing multiple phosphorylation sites (Figure 1A) [1–5]. These receptors regulate important biological functions, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration. Dysregulation of these receptors is associated with cancer, cardiovascular and fibrosis diseases [1–5]. Thus, a clear understanding of the precise regulation of these receptors is essential.
The receptors in this subfamily are regulated by ligand-induced dimerization and subsequent activation through transphosphorylation (Figure 1B) [5–8]. In the absence of ligand, these receptors are monomeric and autoinhibited [5,7–9]. Upon binding to the dimeric ligands, these receptors are assembled into dimers so that two kinases in the dimer could trans-phosphorylate each other and be activated [5,7,8]. Crystallographic studies provided further details for these receptor kinases in autoinhibited and transphosphorylation states [10–13]. In the autoinhibited state, the JM of PDGFRα, FLT3, or c-Kit receptor forms a hairpin winding around the αC helix of the kinase and poses the JM tyrosine-containing segment into the active site of the kinase (Figure 1C) [10,12,13]. As such, the JM blocks the kinase from binding to the substrate [10,12,13]. In the transphosphorylation state of c-Kit kinases, the JM of one kinase is latched onto the C-lobe of another kinase so that the two JM Tyrs from the former kinase can get into the active site of the latter for transphosphorylation (Figure 1D) [11]. Moreover, in this transphosphorylation complex, both kinases are adopted in active conformation [11].
Although these early studies provided a basic framework for understanding the regulation of these receptor kinases, some conceptual gaps regarding the transition and stabilization of different conformational states of the kinase are still missing. For example, it was largely unknown: how is the kinase kept in a precise balance between the autoinhibited state and activated state? In addition, the role of the kinase insert and the potential for higher-order oligomerization in regulating kinase activity remained unexplored. This study addresses these gaps by providing evidence for multiple allosteric mechanisms that collectively fine-tune PDGFRβ kinase activity.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Yanfeng Zhang, Meimei Wang, Guangcan Shao, Qingbin Shang, Mengqiu Dong, Xiaohong Qin, Li-Zhi Mi (2026). Multiple allostery in the regulation of PDGFR beta kinase activities. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2024205
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main finding of this study on PDGFRβ kinase regulation?
The study reveals that PDGFRβ kinase activity is regulated by multiple allosteric mechanisms, including dimerization of activated kinases, autoinhibition by the kinase insert, and dimerization of inactive kinase, which together fine-tune its activity.
How does the kinase insert contribute to PDGFRβ regulation?
The kinase insert acts as an autoinhibitory element, stabilizing the kinase in an inactive conformation. This autoinhibition must be relieved for activation, adding an additional layer of control.
Is this allosteric regulation unique to PDGFRβ?
No, the study shows that similar multiple allosteric regulation is conserved in other type III receptor tyrosine kinases, including CSF1R, suggesting a common regulatory mechanism.
What are the clinical implications of impaired allosteric regulation in CSF1R?
Impaired allosteric regulation of CSF1R is associated with malfunctions of microglia and demyelination of neurons in hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids (HDLS), highlighting its importance in neurological health.
How might these findings impact therapeutic development?
Understanding the multiple allosteric sites offers new targets for drug development, potentially allowing for more precise modulation of PDGFRβ and related kinases in diseases like cancer and fibrosis.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.