Key Takeaways & Executive Findings
- •• Intestinal microbiota metabolites (SCFAs, bile acids, tryptophan derivatives) critically modulate dendritic cell (DC) development and function, balancing immune tolerance and inflammation. • DCs exhibit high plasticity in response to microbial cues, with dysbiosis driving aberrant DC activation and contributing to inflammatory bowel disease and other intestinal disorders. • Metabolic, epigenetic, and signaling reprogramming are key mechanisms by which microbial metabolites shape DC fate and function. • Targeting the microbiota-DC metabolic axis offers promising therapeutic strategies for shifting harmful intestinal inflammation toward homeostatic tolerance.
Abstract
The intestinal microbiota plays critical roles in regulating immunity and inflammation through intricate interactions between microbial metabolites and diverse immune cells. Dendritic cells (DCs), the most potent professional antigen-presenting cells, are essential for sensing the complicated microbiota environment and subsequently initiating and regulating adaptive immune responses. While the commensal microbiota typically mediates DC-triggered immune tolerance and thus the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis, epithelial injury or pathogenic infection generally drives the proinflammatory function of DCs, contributing to harmful inflammation and intestinal disorders. Various microbiota metabolites (such as short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, and tryptophan derivatives) play critical roles in modulating the developmental and functional diversity of DCs through metabolic, epigenetic, or signaling reprogramming. In this review, we discuss the metabolic crosstalk between the intestinal microbiota and DCs and its pivotal function in orchestrating the balance between intestinal homeostasis and pathogenic inflammation. We also discuss future directions to better elucidate the microbiota-DC dialog in intestinal immunity and develop therapeutic approaches for manipulating the microbiota-DC axis against inflammatory disorders.
1. Introduction
The gut microbiota ecosystem, which consists of bacteria, viruses, and fungi, plays a pivotal role in human health and disease by dynamically interacting with the host immune system [1]. While proper regulation of microbiota-immune crosstalk is crucial for maintaining intestinal homeostasis, its dysregulation is closely implicated in various immune-mediated intestinal disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), infections, and tumors [2]. DCs are the master antigen-presenting cells that bridge innate and adaptive immunity. DCs are particularly capable of sensing and presenting microbial antigenic signals to the adaptive immune system, contributing to either tolerance to commensals and dietary antigens or immune defense against pathogens. Importantly, intestinal DCs display significant developmental and functional plasticity to cope with complicated intestinal environments [3–5]. Elucidating the molecular crosstalk between the microbiota and DCs is therefore critical for an in-depth understanding of how the host-immunity-microbiota network controls both intestinal homeostasis and immunological pathogenesis.
Immune-metabolism crosstalk has emerged as an essential mechanism linking the microbiota system to health and disease. Microbial metabolites are derived from multiple sources, such as dietary components, de novo synthesis, and metabolic switching, and are critical in modulating the function and metabolism of DCs in multiple physiological and pathological processes [6]. Various metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids, and tryptophan derivatives, are derived from the intestinal microbial system. These metabolites modulate the development, phenotype, and function of DCs through various mechanisms, such as intracellular signaling modulation, epigenetic reprogramming, and metabolic remodeling, thereby establishing a balanced response of the intestinal immune system. Importantly, intestinal dysbiosis, which is triggered by factors such as gastrointestinal infections, inappropriate diets and stressful psychological events, can lead to metabolic perturbations and aberrant activation of DCs, even causing inflammatory and neoplastic disorders [7,8]. Targeting microbiota-DC crosstalk through metabolic intervention strategies offers a promising direction for shifting harmful intestinal inflammation to homeostatic tolerance. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of how microbiota-derived signals metabolically modulate the fate and function of DCs in intestinal health and disease pathogenesis.
Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...
Mengjie Wang, Haibi Su, Juan Liu (2026). Metabolic crosstalk between intestinal microbiota and dendritic cells: from homeostasis to inflammation. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2025231
Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.
Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the role of dendritic cells in intestinal immunity?
Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells that sense microbial signals and initiate adaptive immune responses. In the intestine, they maintain homeostasis by promoting tolerance to commensals and dietary antigens, but can also drive inflammation upon pathogenic infection or tissue injury.
How do microbial metabolites influence dendritic cell function?
Microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, and tryptophan derivatives modulate DC development and function through metabolic, epigenetic, and signaling reprogramming, thereby balancing immune tolerance and inflammation.
What is the clinical significance of microbiota-DC crosstalk?
Dysregulation of microbiota-DC crosstalk is implicated in inflammatory bowel disease and other intestinal disorders. Understanding this interaction offers potential therapeutic targets for manipulating the microbiota-DC axis to treat inflammatory conditions.
What are the future directions in this field?
Future research aims to better elucidate the molecular mechanisms of microbiota-DC dialog and develop therapeutic approaches that target the microbiota-DC axis to restore intestinal homeostasis and treat inflammatory disorders.
Related Technical Papers & Translations
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis
Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.