🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.3724/abbs.2024133Original Research

Mass spectrometry-based structure-specific N-glycoproteomics and biomedical applications

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: Mass spectrometry-based structure-specific N-glycoproteomics and biomedical applications

Ming Bi¹,Zhixin Tian¹

School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Mass spectrometry-based structure-specific N-glycoproteomics and biomedical applications
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Published:2024Edition:Vol. 56, Issue 8 • pp. 1172-1183Citation:Ming Bi et al. (2024), Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica (生物化学与生物物理学报).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • N-glycosylation exhibits both macro- and microheterogeneity, with thousands of possible glycan structures at each site, necessitating site- and structure-specific analysis. • Advanced mass spectrometry techniques, including chemical derivatization, LC separation, ion mobility, and tandem MS, enable detailed structural characterization of N-glycopeptides. • AI-based software and search engines have improved the interpretation of intact N-glycopeptide fragmentation patterns, facilitating clinical biomarker discovery. • Structure-specific N-glycoproteomics has broad biomedical applications, including early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and understanding immunotherapy responses.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

N-linked glycosylation is a common posttranslational modification of proteins that results in macroheterogeneity of the modification site. However, unlike simpler modifications, N-glycosylation introduces an additional layer of complexity with tens of thousands of possible structures arising from various dimensions, including different monosaccharide compositions, sequence structures, linking structures, isomerism, and three-dimensional conformations. This results in additional microheterogeneity of the modification site of N-glycosylation, i.e., the same N-glycosylation site can be modified with different glycans with a certain stoichiometric ratio. N-glycosylation regulates the structure and function of N-glycoproteins in a site- and structure-specific manner, and differential expression of N-glycosylation under disease conditions needs to be characterized through site- and structure-specific quantitative analysis. Numerous advanced methods ranging from sample preparation to mass spectrum analysis have been developed to distinguish N-glycan structures. Chemical derivatization of monosaccharides, online liquid chromatography separation and ion mobility spectrometry enable the physical differentiation of samples. Tandem mass spectrometry further analyzes the macro/microheterogeneity of intact N-glycopeptides through the analysis of fragment ions. Moreover, the development of search engines and AI-based software has enhanced our understanding of the dissociation patterns of intact N-glycopeptides and the clinical significance of differentially expressed intact N-glycopeptides. With the help of these modern methods, structure-specific N-glycoproteomics has become an important tool with extensive applications in the biomedical field.

1. Introduction

N-linked glycosylation, referred to as N-glycosylation, is a common posttranslational modification of proteins. For the glycosylation site, N-glycosylation occurs at the motif of N-X-S/T/C (X≠P), and approximately 80% of human proteins contain at least one such motif, which is called a putative N-glycoprotein [1,2]. A protein may contain more than one motif in its sequence, and an N-glycoprotein can be glycosylated by one or more N-glycans [3,4]. This macroheterogeneity in the N-glycosylation site parallels that of other small molecules, such as methylation, acetylation, and phosphorylation. In terms of the modification structure, unlike other small-molecule modifications, which involve only a single structure, N-glycosylation involves tens of thousands of structures, including monosaccharide compositions, sequence structures, linkage structures, positional isomers, stereo-conformations and other structural dimensions [5–8]. Consequently, N-glycosylation exhibits microheterogeneity, as one glycosite is commonly modified with different N-glycan structures at specific stoichiometric ratios [9,10].

N-glycosylation regulates the structure and function of N-glycoproteins in a site- and structure-specific manner [11,12]. For example, glycosylation at N71 on mutated programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) can decrease the suppression of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) to enhance the cytotoxicity and efficacy of immunotherapy [13]. N-glycosylation of N57 on PD-1 is necessary for its binding to PD-L1 [14]. AFP-L3, a glycosylation variant of alpha fetoprotein (AFP) with a specific core-fucosylated N-glycan structure (YY(F)M(MYLS)MYLS, where Y represents N-acetylglucosamine, M represents mannose, L represents galactose, F represents fucose and S represents sialic acid), exhibits greater sensitivity than AFP in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [15]. The terminal fucose of N-glycan is highly involved in various biological processes, such as virus infection [16], the gut microbiome [17], and intestinal commensal bacteria [18]. Furthermore, terminal sialic acid is strongly associated with anti-inflammatory effects [19], allergies [20], and the gut microbiome [21]. The immunoglobulin G (IgG) modified with α2,6 sialic acid in the Fc fragment is an anti-inflammatory agent for arthritis treatment, whereas its α2,3 sialic acid is not. N-glycosylation under pathological conditions was characterized by site- and structure-specific quantitative analysis.

With the rapid development and widespread application of material preparation, highly efficient liquid chromatography separation, high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry analysis, intelligent bioinformatics and other technologies, omics technology based on mass spectrometry has been widely applied for qualitative and quantitative analysis of site- and structure-specific protein N-glycosylation under both normal physiological and abnormal pathological conditions.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Ming Bi, Zhixin Tian (2026). Mass spectrometry-based structure-specific N-glycoproteomics and biomedical applications. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2024133
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is N-glycosylation and why is it important?

N-glycosylation is a common posttranslational modification where glycans attach to asparagine residues in proteins. It regulates protein structure and function in a site- and structure-specific manner, and its dysregulation is linked to various diseases, making it a key target for biomedical research.

What are the challenges in analyzing N-glycosylation?

N-glycosylation exhibits macroheterogeneity (different sites) and microheterogeneity (different glycan structures at the same site), with tens of thousands of possible structures. This complexity requires advanced analytical methods to achieve site- and structure-specific characterization.

How does mass spectrometry contribute to N-glycoproteomics?

Mass spectrometry, especially tandem MS, enables the identification and quantification of intact N-glycopeptides. Combined with separation techniques like liquid chromatography and ion mobility, it allows detailed structural analysis of glycans, including composition, linkage, and isomerism.

What are the biomedical applications of structure-specific N-glycoproteomics?

It is used to discover biomarkers for diseases like hepatocellular carcinoma (e.g., AFP-L3), understand immune responses (e.g., PD-1 glycosylation), and develop targeted therapies. It also aids in studying inflammatory conditions and infections.

What role do AI and software play in N-glycoproteomics?

AI-based software and search engines help interpret complex MS/MS spectra of intact N-glycopeptides, improving the accuracy of glycan structure assignment and enabling high-throughput analysis. This accelerates the translation of N-glycoproteomics into clinical applications.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF