🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.3724/abbs.2026021Original Research

Luteolin reprograms macrophage polarization via the STING-TBK1 pathway to accelerate bone repair

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: Luteolin reprograms macrophage polarization via the STING-TBK1 pathway to accelerate bone repair

ZHANG Dinglei¹,WANG Yilun¹,LUO Lili¹,BIAN Huihui¹,GAO Zhimin¹,LI Yinghua¹,ZHANG Tianlong¹,SU Li¹,LIAO Hongli¹,LIU Ying¹,LIANG Yi¹

Shanghai Baoshan Luodian Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai University

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Luteolin reprograms macrophage polarization via the STING-TBK1 pathway to accelerate bone repair
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Published:January 15, 2026Edition:Vol 58, Issue 5 • pp. 100-112Citation:ZHANG Dinglei et al. (2026), Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica (生物化学与生物物理学报).
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Luteolin promotes M2 macrophage polarization while suppressing M1 polarization, shifting the inflammatory balance toward tissue repair. • Luteolin inhibits STING oligomerization and the STING-TBK1 signaling pathway, reducing downstream inflammatory responses. • In a mouse tibial bone defect model, luteolin alleviates inflammation, enhances angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and bone density. • Luteolin represents a promising therapeutic agent for bone repair via immunomodulation of macrophage polarization.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Macrophages play a pivotal role in bone regeneration, making their polarization a key target for immune regulation and therapeutic intervention. Modulating macrophage polarization represents a promising strategy for enhancing bone repair. Luteolin, a plant-derived flavonoid with well-documented anti-inflammatory properties, has been explored for its role in bone repair. However, its specific effects on macrophage polarization in bone repair remain unclear. This study investigates the role of luteolin in macrophage polarization and its underlying mechanisms. Our findings demonstrate that luteolin promotes M2 polarization while suppressing M1 polarization, as indicated by a reduction in the expression of pro-inflammatory markers, including IL-6 and iNOS, and an increase in the expression of anti-inflammatory factors, such as CD206, IL-10, and TGF-β. Mechanistically, luteolin inhibits STING oligomerization, thereby suppressing the STING-TBK1 pathway and mitigating downstream inflammatory responses. In vivo, in a mouse tibial bone defect model, luteolin effectively alleviates inflammation, facilitates angiogenesis, enhances collagen deposition, and improves bone density. Collectively, these findings highlight the potential of luteolin as a therapeutic agent for bone repair by modulating macrophage polarization and inhibiting STING-TBK1 signaling.

1. Introduction

Bone defects, characterized by compromised structural integrity and impaired regeneration, pose significant clinical challenges by disrupting biomechanical balance and sustaining inflammation [1,2]. Current treatments, such as autologous bone grafting and tissue-engineered scaffolds, have shown limited success due to issues such as immune rejection, poor osteoinductive potential, and inadequate vascularization [3‒8]. Thus, it is crucial to create advanced therapies that support bone regeneration and address the limitations of current treatments.

Macrophages are key players in the innate immune system, influencing both the initiation and resolution of inflammation [9]. Found in nearly all tissues, these versatile cells are involved in infection, tissue repair, and regeneration [10‒13]. Increasingly, macrophages are recognized for their role in bone healing, where they polarize into unique phenotypes (M1/M2) to regulate the inflammatory environment [14,15]. M1 macrophages are pivotal in the initiation of inflammatory responses through the secretion of key inflammatory mediators, including interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and IL-6 [16]. These mediators trigger localized inflammation and promote the differentiation of monocytes into osteoclasts [17‒21], thereby accelerating bone resorption and contributing to a reduction in bone density. In contrast, M2 macrophages are involved in promoting tissue repair and regeneration through the secretion of diverse cytokines [22]. These cytokines support osteogenic differentiation, stimulate angiogenesis, and enhance extracellular matrix deposition, which collectively contribute to tissue healing and regeneration [23‒27]. Thus, modulating macrophage polarization represents a promising therapeutic approach for regulating bone homeostasis and enhancing bone regeneration, providing an effective strategy for the repair of bone tissue.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
ZHANG Dinglei, WANG Yilun, LUO Lili, BIAN Huihui, GAO Zhimin, LI Yinghua, ZHANG Tianlong, SU Li, LIAO Hongli, LIU Ying, LIANG Yi (2026). Luteolin reprograms macrophage polarization via the STING-TBK1 pathway to accelerate bone repair. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.3724/abbs.2026021
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of luteolin in macrophage polarization?

Luteolin promotes M2 polarization while suppressing M1 polarization, as evidenced by decreased pro-inflammatory markers (IL-6, iNOS) and increased anti-inflammatory factors (CD206, IL-10, TGF-β).

How does luteolin affect the STING-TBK1 pathway?

Luteolin inhibits STING oligomerization, thereby suppressing the STING-TBK1 signaling pathway and mitigating downstream inflammatory responses.

What are the in vivo effects of luteolin in bone repair?

In a mouse tibial bone defect model, luteolin alleviates inflammation, facilitates angiogenesis, enhances collagen deposition, and improves bone density.

What is the significance of this study for bone repair therapies?

The study highlights luteolin as a potential therapeutic agent for bone repair by modulating macrophage polarization and inhibiting STING-TBK1 signaling, offering a novel immunomodulatory strategy.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF