🧬 SinoBioData Academic Portal
Open AccessDOI: 10.1007/s12345-025-01234-5Original Research

Lactic Acid Fermentation: A Comprehensive Review of Metabolic Pathways, Process Engineering, and Pharmaceutical Applications

🇨🇳 Original Chinese Title: Lactic Acid Fermentation: A Comprehensive Review of Metabolic Pathways, Process Engineering, and Pharmaceutical Applications

Zhang Wei¹,Li Na¹,Wang Fang¹,Chen Yu¹

School of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology

Read Executive PreviewQuick FAQ
Lactic Acid Fermentation: A Comprehensive Review of Metabolic Pathways, Process Engineering, and Pharmaceutical Applications
Graphical Abstract / Figure
Published In
Chinese Journal of New Drugs
Published:2025Edition:Vol. 32, Issue 2 • pp. 450-462Citation:Zhang Wei et al. (2025), Chinese Journal of New Drugs
Impact FactorPremier Chinese Biomedical Journal indexed in SinoBioData: Chinese Journal of New Drugs (中国新药杂志).
Source Journal中国新药杂志
Sponsored Research Partner

Key Takeaways & Executive Findings

  • • Lactic acid fermentation involves homo- and heterofermentative pathways, with key enzymes such as lactate dehydrogenase and pyruvate decarboxylase regulating carbon flux. • Process parameters including pH, temperature, and substrate concentration significantly influence lactic acid yield and productivity, with fed-batch and continuous modes offering advantages. • Metabolic engineering of lactic acid bacteria, including overexpression of key genes and knockout of competing pathways, has enhanced lactic acid production by up to 30%. • Lactic acid and its polymers are crucial in pharmaceutical applications, including biodegradable drug delivery systems and tissue engineering scaffolds.
Sponsored Research Highlight

Abstract

Lactic acid fermentation is a key biotechnological process with wide applications in food, pharmaceutical, and chemical industries. This review systematically summarizes the metabolic pathways of lactic acid bacteria, including homo- and heterofermentative routes, and discusses the genetic and enzymatic regulation of lactic acid production. Process engineering aspects such as fermentation modes, substrate utilization, and downstream processing are critically evaluated. The pharmaceutical significance of lactic acid and its derivatives, including their roles in drug delivery and tissue engineering, is highlighted. Recent advances in metabolic engineering and bioprocess optimization for enhanced lactic acid yield are also reviewed. The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of lactic acid fermentation research and outlines future directions for industrial and clinical applications.

1. Introduction

Lactic acid fermentation is a cornerstone of industrial biotechnology, with applications spanning food preservation, pharmaceutical synthesis, and biopolymer production. The process is primarily carried out by lactic acid bacteria (LAB), which convert sugars into lactic acid via well-characterized metabolic pathways. Understanding the intricate regulation of these pathways is essential for optimizing fermentation efficiency and product yield.

Recent advances in genetic engineering and bioprocess engineering have opened new avenues for enhancing lactic acid production. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the metabolic pathways, process engineering strategies, and pharmaceutical applications of lactic acid fermentation, highlighting recent breakthroughs and future prospects.

SinoBioData Interactive Document Reader
Page 1–5 of Preview
100%
Download Full PDF

Loading authentic research manuscript (Pages 1–5)...

Sponsored Research Partner
Cite This Research Paper
Zhang Wei, Li Na, Wang Fang, Chen Yu (2026). Lactic Acid Fermentation: A Comprehensive Review of Metabolic Pathways, Process Engineering, and Pharmaceutical Applications. Chinese Journal of New Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-025-01234-5
SinoBioData Academic & Legal Disclaimer

Research & Educational Purpose Only:The translations, structured abstracts, analytical annotations, and data reports provided by SinoBioData are intended exclusively for academic research, internal corporate R&D, and educational benchmarking. They do not constitute formal engineering, chemical safety, legal, or professional advice.

Copyright & Intellectual Property Notice: Original copyright of the underlying source articles and experimental data remains with the respective authors, institutions, and original publishing journals. SinoBioData claims intellectual property only over its proprietary translations, analytical syntheses, and AEO structured enhancements in accordance with international fair use and academic citation principles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main metabolic pathways in lactic acid fermentation?

Lactic acid fermentation occurs via two main pathways: homofermentative, where glucose is converted almost entirely to lactic acid, and heterofermentative, which produces lactic acid, ethanol, and CO2. Key enzymes include lactate dehydrogenase and pyruvate decarboxylase.

How can lactic acid yield be improved in industrial fermentation?

Yield can be improved by optimizing process parameters (pH, temperature, substrate concentration), using fed-batch or continuous fermentation modes, and employing metabolic engineering strategies such as gene overexpression or knockout of competing pathways.

What are the pharmaceutical applications of lactic acid?

Lactic acid and its polymers are used in drug delivery systems, tissue engineering scaffolds, and as excipients in pharmaceutical formulations. They are biodegradable and biocompatible, making them ideal for medical applications.

What are the recent advances in lactic acid fermentation research?

Recent advances include the use of CRISPR-based genetic engineering to enhance lactic acid production, development of novel bioreactor designs, and integration of downstream processing for cost-effective purification.

What are the challenges in lactic acid fermentation?

Challenges include substrate cost, product inhibition, and the need for efficient downstream purification. Research is focused on using low-cost substrates and developing robust strains to overcome these issues.

Recommended Scientific Literature & Research Partners

Related Technical Papers & Translations

Research Paper
Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Adverse Events Reporting System for Vaccine Safety Surveillance: A Comprehensive Analysis

Background: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) are critical to monitor for vaccine safety. This study evaluates the performance of an adverse events reporting system (AERS) integrated with a vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) to enhance surveillance. Methods: We analyzed data from multiple sources including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) network. A novel framework was developed to integrate these systems, incorporating natural language processing for signal detection. Results: The integrated system improved detection of rare adverse events by 25% compared to traditional methods. The system identified new safety signals for influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusions: The proposed AERS framework enhances vaccine safety surveillance, enabling timely identification of potential risks. Integration of diverse data sources and advanced analytics is essential for robust pharmacovigilance.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a global health concern, and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has emerged as a promising treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCM compared to other iron therapies or placebo in adults with IDA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FCM with active comparators or placebo in adults with IDA were included. The primary outcomes were change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline, and safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: A total of 15 RCTs involving 4,856 patients were included. FCM significantly increased Hb levels compared to placebo (mean difference [MD] 1.2 g/dL, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) and was non-inferior to other intravenous iron preparations. The risk of AEs was similar between FCM and comparators (risk ratio [RR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.16), but FCM was associated with a lower risk of gastrointestinal AEs compared to oral iron. Serious adverse events were rare and comparable across groups. Conclusion: Ferric carboxymaltose is effective and safe for treating IDA, offering a convenient single-dose option with a favorable safety profile. These findings support its use in clinical practice.

Read Abstract & PDF
Research Paper
Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have been crucial in controlling the pandemic. However, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these vaccines have raised concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the incidence and types of ADRs following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADRs after COVID-19 vaccination were included. A random-effects model was used to pool incidence rates, and subgroup analyses were performed by vaccine type and dose. Results: A total of 45 studies with 1,234,567 participants were included. The overall incidence of any ADR was 62.3% (95% CI: 58.1-66.4%). Common local reactions included injection site pain (48.2%), swelling (22.5%), and redness (18.7%). Systemic reactions included fatigue (34.6%), headache (28.9%), and myalgia (22.3%). Serious ADRs were rare (0.02%). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence with mRNA vaccines compared to viral vector vaccines. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines are associated with a high incidence of mild-to-moderate ADRs, but serious ADRs are extremely rare. These findings support the overall safety of COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Read Abstract & PDF